Skip to content

LIC Housing Finance Limited (LICHSGFIN)

Mid Cap

Financial Services stocks · Mid cap · NSE

LIC Housing Finance Ltd. (LICHSGFIN) is a housing finance company incorporated in 1989. It provides housing finance across India through a network of 303 area offices, 23 back offices, and 10 regional offices. The company's loan portfolio crossed Rs. 3 lakh crore and profit crossed Rs. 5000 crore by FY25. LIC holds a 45.24% stake.

₹511.5
-9.50 · -1.82%
Market cap ₹29,329 Cr
IndicesNifty 500
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals16 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result31 Jul, 02:03 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags04 Oct 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 17.0 (n=243)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

43Neutral

MACD −

Stock trend: 42
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -5.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

LICHSGFIND candles · FIT view-5.4%
Latest close ₹511.50 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-2.0%
RSI
41
MACD hist
-2.68
52W pos
38%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹522.00H ₹523.80L ₹510.80C ₹511.50Vol 8.3L sh
₹479.81₹510.82₹541.83₹572.83₹603.8452H₹511.502026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

LICHSGFINNifty Financial ServicesNifty 500
-13%-7%-1%+5%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026LICHSGFIN -7.4%Nifty Financial Servi… -6.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
LICHSGFIN
-7.4%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Financial Services
-6.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-1.8 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-14.5%
₹598.2
52W range position
38%
₹458.9 - ₹598.2
ATR (14)
3.4%
₹17.6
Volume vs 20D
0.23x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹190 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹497.2 - ₹576.7
41.3% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
55

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -1.4% · PAT +9.9% YoY

Technical
Neutral
43

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+80.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
49

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -1% YoY · PAT +10% YoY · operating leverage

Filed 30 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹7,083 Cr-1.4%-0.2%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹1,499 Cr+9.9%+0.4%
PAT margin21.2%+218 bps+11 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
5.11
P/B
0.71
EV/EBITDA
2416.28
Market Cap
29329.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
14.40%
ROCE
8.59%
ROA
1.76%
Dividend Y
1.88%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
8.00%
EPS 5Y
15.00%
Revenue 3Y
8.00%
EPS 3Y
25.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
6.70
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
0.29
Book Value
753.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
0/5
OCF
-8504.00 Cr
EPS TTM
104.33

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
45.24%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
53%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 7,083-0.2% vs prev
07303Sep 2023: 6,765Dec 2023: 6,804Mar 2024: 6,948Jun 2024: 6,797Sep 2024: 6,938Dec 2024: 7,070Mar 2025: 7,303Jun 2025: 7,186Sep 2025: 7,179Dec 2025: 7,206Mar 2026: 7,094Jun 2026: 7,083Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1,499+0.4% vs prev
01499Sep 2023: 1,192Dec 2023: 1,169Mar 2024: 1,082Jun 2024: 1,306Sep 2024: 1,328Dec 2024: 1,435Mar 2025: 1,374Jun 2025: 1,364Sep 2025: 1,349Dec 2025: 1,398Mar 2026: 1,493Jun 2026: 1,499Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 41.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
  • RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 14% off 52W high · 11% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

44
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-6.7%
3M return
-7.4%
6M return
-8.5%
1Y return
-12.7%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-5
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 4.9% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.6% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 93.3-0.81%
838995100106Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2693
RS vs Nifty 50093

Valuation & peers

U-Score 55 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

55U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation30/30
Growth17/25
Quality6/20
Balance Sheet1/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
3/9 (+1)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
55

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

55/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 80.8%.
  • Valuation contributes 30/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 17/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.3, in distress territory.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 0/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 1/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
5.1
PB
0.7
EV/EBITDA
2416.3
ROE
14.4%
ROCE
8.6%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
6.7
MoS
+80.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
55
Previous: 55
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+80.8%
Previous: +80.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1,329.52
+61.5% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
25.5
Growth-justified Value
₹2,660.42
+80.8% MoS
PEG
0.27

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
KPIL
Large
Kalpataru Projects International Limited
Real Estate
match 154
48
21.5
13.7%
+31%
FAIR VALUE
OBEROIRLTY
Mid
Oberoi Realty Limited
Real Estate
match 151
55
23.4
14.6%
+30%
FAIR VALUE
SOBHA
Large
Sobha Limited
Real Estate
match 148
28
55.9
4.2%
-64%
OVERVALUED
PRESTIGE
Mid
Prestige Estates Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 148
25
55.8
7.5%
-67%
OVERVALUED
GANESHHOU
Small
GANESH HOUSING LIMITED
Real Estate
match 147
62
22.1
16.0%
+36%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-15T07:26:32.450Z
Management commentary snapshot

LICHSGFIN reported 9% YoY PAT growth in Q4 FY26, with total disbursements up 10% YoY. Full-year PAT grew 3% and disbursements 4%. Asset quality improved with Stage 3 EAD at 2.16%, but NIMs compressed YoY to 2.80% in Q4 and 2.68% for FY26.

Disbursement growth and asset quality improvement are positive, but the decline in Net Interest Margins, Return on Average Equity, and Return on Average Assets for FY26 suggests profitability is under pressure. The sequential NIM improvement in Q4 needs to be sustained.

Current business mix

Loan Book Composition as of March 31, 2026

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Individual Home Loans84.5%
Non-Housing Individual11.3%
NHC-Project Loans2.9%
NHC-Others1.3%
Growth engines

Individual Home Loan Growth

Individual Home Loan Disbursements grew 8% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 6% YoY in FY26.

Non-Housing Individual Loan Growth

Non-Housing Individual Loan Disbursements grew 25% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 20% YoY in FY26.

Online Loan Approvals

Online loan approvals reached Rs. 6530 Cr in FY26, indicating digital channel traction.

Geographic Expansion

Company operates through 303 Area Offices, 23 Back Offices, and 10 Regional Offices, expanding its reach.

Capacity and execution

Office Network Expansion

The number of marketing offices increased to 303 in 2026 from 282 in 2020.

Employee Base

Employee count increased to 2399 in 2026 from 2392 in 2020.

Tailwinds

Improving Asset Quality

Stage 3 EAD improved to 2.16% in March 2026 from 2.47% in March 2025, with total ECL provisions decreasing.

Lower Cost of Funds

Weighted average cost of funds decreased to 7.27% in Q4 FY26 from 7.73% in Q4 FY25, with incremental cost of funds at 6.86%.

Headwinds

NIM Compression

Net Interest Margins declined YoY for both Q4 FY26 (2.80% vs 2.85%) and FY26 (2.68% vs 2.73%).

Profitability Metric Decline

Return on Average Equity (ROAE) decreased to 14% in FY26 from 16% in FY25, and ROAA declined to 1.78% from 1.83%.

Project Finance Decline

Project Finance disbursements declined 48% YoY in FY26 and 3% YoY in Q4 FY26.

Risk radar

Sustaining NIMs

The YoY decline in NIMs for both Q4 and FY26 indicates pressure on interest income spreads, despite a sequential Q4 improvement.

Profitability Metrics

Return on Average Equity and Return on Average Assets declined in FY26, suggesting challenges in maintaining profitability.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Nov 2025
Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing annual growth in disbursements, portfolio, and overall profitability trends. QoQ comparison for NIMs is important to track sequential momentum and the impact of changing interest rate cycles.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Total Loan Disbursements

Q4 FY26 total disbursements grew 10% YoY to Rs. 21019 cr. FY26 total disbursements grew 4% YoY to Rs. 66544 cr.

Individual Home Loan Disbursements

Q4 FY26 individual home loan disbursements grew 8% YoY to Rs. 16672 cr. FY26 individual home loan disbursements grew 6% YoY to Rs. 54503 cr.

Non-Housing Individual Loan Disbursements

Q4 FY26 non-housing individual loan disbursements grew 25% YoY to Rs. 3348 cr. FY26 non-housing individual loan disbursements grew 20% YoY to Rs. 9636 cr.

Outstanding Portfolio

Total outstanding portfolio grew 4% YoY to Rs. 320707 cr as of March 31, 2026.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
NIM Trend2.80% (Q4 FY26)Sustained sequential improvement and stabilization of YoY NIMs.
Asset Quality (Stage 3 EAD)2.16% (March 2026)Continued reduction in Stage 3 EAD and stable provision coverage.
Disbursement Growth10% YoY (Q4 FY26)Track growth in individual home and non-housing individual loan disbursements.
ROAE/ROAA14% / 1.78% (FY26)Observe stabilization or improvement in Return on Average Equity and Assets.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

Going forward, credit costs are expected to be further reduced, achieving the guided range of 50 basis points.

Timeframe: going forwardDirection: further reducedConfidence: pretty sure

"credit costs would be further reduced, and I think we would be able to achieve the guided range of 50 basis points"

operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

In the remaining two quarters, Q3 and Q4, we expect at least three big loans to be settled.

Timeframe: Q3 and Q4Direction: settledConfidence: expect

"We expect in the remaining two quarters, Q3 and Q4, at least three big loans to be settled."

revenue outlookpartially deliveredquantified

By the end of the year, disbursements and the loan book are expected to accelerate further, getting closer to the guided double-digit growth.

Timeframe: by the end of the yearDirection: accelerate furtherConfidence: hopeful

"by the end of the year we will be closer to the guided figure of double-digit growth"

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 0.3% across 2 later quarter(s).

operational efficiencynot yet verifiable

The BT (Balance Transfer) challenge is expected to be over due to recent reductions in rewriting rates.

Timeframe: nowDirection: overConfidence: hopeful

"we are hopeful that this BT challenge is now over"

Trust Score
49Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Management has 100% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 1 checked claims. It ranks around the 6th percentile of the scored universe and 9th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 20 Oct 2026
management-trust-v1
28 docs text-extracted · 7 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
6th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 9th pctile, median 62 · Mid: 2nd pctile, median 76

Evidence depth
Financial-only

28 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
100% delivered or partly delivered

1/4 claims checked · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
22
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
67
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-8504 Cr.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 6.70.
  • ▸Altman Z is 0.29.
  • ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Concall transcript

Shareholder Meeting / Postal Ballot-Outcome of AGM 3 Sep - LIC Housing Finance AGM transcript covers FY26 results, 500% dividend, NPA reduction, and growth outlook.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Transcript

Source: Company Ir

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 13 May - LIC Housing Finance reported FY26 PAT of Rs 5,595.15 crore, proposed 500% dividend, Q4 PAT up 9%.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.