IP
IndiaPulse

Latent View Analytics Limited (LATENTVIEW)

Large Cap

IT stocks · Large cap · NSE

Latent View Analytics is a data and AI capabilities provider, serving Fortune 500 companies with analytics solutions. It has grown significantly since its listing, crossing ₹1,000 Cr revenue in FY26, and operates with an 1,800+ global workforce across North America, LATAM, APAC, UK, and EU, utilizing onshore, nearshore, and offshore delivery models.

₹267.25
+1.25 · +0.47%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · IT P/E 22.6 (n=200)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
44

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
81

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
34

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
87

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -8% YoY · margin compression · Rev +22% YoY

Filed 01 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹287 Cr+21.6%-0.7%
EBITDA₹57 Cr+14.0%-16.2%
Operating margin20.0%-100 bps-300 bps
PAT₹47 Cr-7.8%-14.6%
PAT margin16.4%-523 bps-265 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T18:02:55.064Z
Management commentary snapshot

Latent View Analytics reported strong FY26 performance with INR revenue up 25.0% YoY to ₹10,602 Mn and PAT up 16.5% YoY to ₹2,021 Mn. Q4FY26 saw sequential improvement in Adjusted EBITDA margin to 24.1% despite a slight YoY decline.

The company delivered robust annual growth in revenue and profit for FY26, crossing a significant revenue milestone. Q4FY26 showed sequential margin recovery, supported by dollar appreciation, offsetting increased SG&A. Client concentration remains high, but strong long-term client relationships and strategic focus on AI, data engineering, and deepening client ties position it for continued growth.

Current business mix

Revenue Mix by Client Tier (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Over ₹500Mn59.0%
₹100 to ₹500Mn24.0%
₹50 to ₹100Mn7.0%
Under ₹50Mn10.0%
Growth engines

Strategic Databricks Partnership

Fostering data engineering innovation and best practices, empowering clients with cutting-edge cloud data solutions.

Deepening Client Relationships

Identification of diamond accounts and efforts to deepen relationships to enable accelerated growth.

AI Strategy

Core team driving the embedding of AI into business processes, with investment in talent upskilling for advanced analytics and AI.

Financial Services Vertical Growth

Our Financial Services vertical grew in revenue by 84% YoY in FY26.

Tailwinds

USD Appreciation

Positive impact on margin due to $ appreciation in Q4FY26.

Headwinds

Q3 One-time Cost Hit

Cost hit due to one-time labor code impact and headcount rationalization related severance pay accounted in Q3.

Increased SG&A Spend

Incremental travel and other SG&A spend impacting margins.

Risk radar

Client Concentration

Top 5 clients account for 56% of revenue, Top 10 for 69%, and Top 20 for 84% in FY26.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Annual (YoY) comparison is crucial for assessing overall business growth and profitability trends over a full fiscal year. Quarterly (QoQ) comparison is important for tracking sequential momentum, margin movements, and the immediate impact of operational factors like cost management and currency fluctuations.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

FY26 Revenue (INR)

₹10,602 Million (YoY Growth 25.0%)

FY26 Revenue (USD)

$119.8 Million (YoY Growth 19.4%)

FY26 Adjusted EBITDA Margin

23.0% (YoY decline of 0.7%)

FY26 Gross Margin

50.8%

Management forward view

Focus on Data Engineering

Enhance Data Engineering through Databricks Partnership to foster innovation and best practices.

Client Relationship Strategy

Deepening client relationships by identifying diamond accounts based on potential value tiers.

AI Integration and Upskilling

Core team driving embedding AI into business processes, with investment in talent upskilling for advanced analytics and AI.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
USD Revenue Growth19.4% YoY (FY26)Sustained growth momentum, especially from existing clients and new logos.
Adjusted EBITDA Margin23.0% (FY26), 24.1% (Q4FY26)Stability and improvement, managing SG&A costs and leveraging currency benefits.
Client Concentration (Top 5)56% (FY26)Diversification of client base or increased revenue per client to mitigate concentration risk.
Financial Services Vertical Growth84% YoY (FY26)Continued strong performance and contribution from this high-growth vertical.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

34Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.1% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 57
Sector 3M: +0.1% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

LATENTVIEWdaily · 1Y · AUTO-14.5%
Latest close ₹267.25 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.1%
RSI
35
MACD hist
-0.84
52W pos
7%
2026-09-04O ₹267.00H ₹270.80L ₹265.85C ₹267.25Vol 3.5L sh
₹240.42₹282.13₹323.85₹365.56₹407.2852L267.252026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 35.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~8.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 35 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 48% off 52W high · 8% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

8
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-10.1%
3M return
-12.2%
6M return
-9.4%
1Y return
-35.8%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-3
Sector rank
#14
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 12.0% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -5.8%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 65.28+0.48%
627893109124Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2665
RS vs Nifty 50065

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 44 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

44U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation4/30
Growth13/25
Quality5/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
44

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

44/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 16.4%.
  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 4/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 5/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 5/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
28.3
PB
3.1
EV/EBITDA
19.4
ROE
11.9%
ROCE
15.8%
FCF Yield
1.7%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+16.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
44
Previous: 44
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
+16.4%
Previous: +16.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
44
48
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
44
44

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹134.28
-99.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.8
Growth-justified Value
₹319.69
+16.4% MoS
PEG
2.11

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
81Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 93rd percentile of the scored universe and 89th percentile within IT. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 65.1%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
89 docs text-extracted · 37 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
93rd percentile

overall median 67 · IT: 89th pctile, median 69 · Large: 83rd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

89 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
87
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 65.1%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.7%.
  • 5 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • No major Trust Lite risk flags.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
28.30
P/B
3.15
EV/EBITDA
19.45
Market Cap
5530.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
11.90%
ROCE
15.80%
ROA
11.12%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
28.00%
EPS 5Y
17.00%
Revenue 3Y
25.00%
EPS 3Y
8.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
27.00×
Altman Z
8.78
Book Value
84.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.74%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
165.00 Cr
EPS TTM
9.45

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
65.10%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
7%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 1,060+25.0% vs prev
01060Mar 2013: 33.0Mar 2014: 78.0Mar 2019: 288Mar 2020: 310Mar 2021: 306Mar 2022: 408Mar 2023: 539Mar 2024: 641Mar 2025: 848Mar 2026: 1,060FY13FY14FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 202+16.8% vs prev
0202.0Mar 2013: 8.0Mar 2014: 17.0Mar 2019: 60.0Mar 2020: 73.0Mar 2021: 91.0Mar 2022: 130Mar 2023: 155Mar 2024: 159Mar 2025: 173Mar 2026: 202FY13FY14FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 11.5-0.3% vs prev
054.0Mar 2013: 54.0%Mar 2014: 48.9%Mar 2019: 22.5%Mar 2020: 21.0%Mar 2021: 20.8%Mar 2022: 12.7%Mar 2023: 12.8%Mar 2024: 11.6%Mar 2025: 11.5%Mar 2026: 11.5%FY13FY14FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Peers

Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.