IP
IndiaPulse

Jindal Stainless Limited (JSL)

Large Cap

Metals stocks · Large cap · NSE

Jindal Stainless is India’s leading stainless steel manufacturer with an FY26 turnover of INR 42,955 crore. It operates 16 manufacturing/processing facilities globally and a network in 12 countries. The company is ramping up its annual melt capacity to 4.2 million tonnes in FY27, focusing on integrated operations and sustainable manufacturing via electric arc furnaces.

₹737.85
-0.55 · -0.07%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Metals P/E 20.4 (n=89)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
61

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
78

low confidence · 2/4 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
53

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
95

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 22/100

margin compression · Rev +11% YoY · PAT +8% YoY

Filed 03 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹11,279 Cr+10.5%-0.5%
EBITDA₹1,329 Cr+2.5%-8.7%
Operating margin12.0%-100 bps-100 bps
PAT₹769 Cr+7.5%-7.8%
PAT margin6.8%-18 bps-54 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T17:57:56.561Z
Management commentary snapshot

JSL reports strong Q4 & FY26 consolidated financial performance with double-digit YoY growth in revenue, EBITDA, and PAT, alongside significant deleveraging. Sales volume remained flat QoQ and YoY in Q4, but grew 8% for FY26.

The company demonstrated robust financial growth and improved leverage ratios in FY26, driven by domestic demand across key sectors. While Q4 volumes were flat, the overall annual volume growth and positive market outlook for FY27 suggest continued momentum. Raw material price increases could impact spreads, but strong demand may allow for pass-through.

Current business mix

Sales Composition – Q4 FY26

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Domestic93.0%
Export7.0%
Growth engines

Automobile Sector

Domestic automobile market demand remained resilient, closing FY26 with strong performance. Outlook for FY27 remains positive.

Infrastructure Development

Stainless steel usage in flyovers, ROBs, FOBs is rising. Lift and elevator demand is strong due to urbanization and infrastructure development.

Railways

Healthy coach demand in Q4 FY26 from Vande Bharat sleeper trainsets and Metro. Amrit Bharat coaches expected to boost demand.

Process Industry

Steady demand from Oil & Gas, Power, Water sectors. Emerging applications in Chemicals & Fertilizers, Hydroelectric, Dairy, Thermal Power Plants.

Capacity and execution

Annual Melt Capacity Expansion

Ramping up facilities to reach 4.2 million tonnes of annual melt capacity in FY27.

Tailwinds

Resilient Domestic Demand

Domestic automobile market demand remained resilient. Positive domestic demand outlook for infrastructure in FY27.

Increased Construction Activity

Sector witnessed positive demand in Q4 FY26 on back of increased construction activities.

Government Initiatives in Railways

Indian Railways' shift from ferritic to austenitic stainless steel and Amrit Bharat coaches expected to boost demand.

Headwinds

Geopolitical Factors & Fuel Disruptions

Minor headwinds from fuel and gas disruptions and geopolitical factors in the Process Industry.

Wagon Wheel Shortage

Wagon led SS demand impacted by ongoing wheel shortage.

Risk radar

Raw Material Price Volatility

Nickel and Ferrochrome prices showed significant QoQ and YoY increases in Q4 FY26, indicating potential input cost pressure.

Geopolitical & Energy Disruptions

Management noted minor headwinds from fuel and gas disruptions and geopolitical factors affecting the Process Industry.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Jan 2026
Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for assessing overall growth and annual trends in a cyclical business like metals. QoQ comparison is vital for tracking sequential momentum, commodity price impact, and operational efficiency in a dynamic market.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Consolidated Sales Volume

Q4 FY26: 642 '000 MT (0% YoY, -1% QoQ). FY26: 2,566 '000 MT (8% YoY).

Consolidated Revenue

Q4 FY26: INR 11,337 Cr (11% YoY, 8% QoQ). FY26: INR 42,955 Cr (9% YoY).

Consolidated EBITDA

Q4 FY26: INR 1,455 Cr (37% YoY, 3% QoQ). FY26: INR 5,560 Cr (19% YoY).

Consolidated PAT

Q4 FY26: INR 834 Cr (41% YoY, 1% QoQ). FY26: INR 3,185 Cr (27% YoY).

Management forward view

Focus on Sustainability

Jindal Stainless remains focused on a greener and sustainable future, manufacturing stainless steel using electric arc furnace.

Cost Competitiveness

The company relies on its integrated operations to enhance its cost competitiveness and operational efficiency.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Consolidated Sales VolumeQ4 FY26: 642 '000 MT (0% YoY)Sustained growth in volumes, especially domestic, to confirm demand outlook.
Consolidated EBITDAQ4 FY26: INR 1,455 Cr (37% YoY)Maintenance of strong EBITDA margins amidst rising raw material costs and potential pricing power.
Net Debt/EBITDA0.55x (as of Mar'26)Further deleveraging or efficient utilization of debt for planned capacity expansion.
Raw Material Prices (Nickel, Ferrochrome)Rising QoQ and YoY in Q4 FY26Trends in key input costs and the company's ability to pass on increases to maintain spreads.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
margin outlookpartially deliveredquantified

The company expects to close the year with an average EBITDA of around Rs. 19,000 to Rs. 21,000 per metric ton.

Timeframe: this yearDirection: achieve targetConfidence: we believe... should be closing

"this year on an average basis around this number we should be closing."

Outcome check: OPM moved from 13.0% to average 13.0% (+0.0 pp).

project executionnot yet verifiable

The SMS project in Indonesia and aligned downstream capacity expansion in India are progressing well and remain on track as per the timeline.

Timeframe: as per the timelineDirection: on trackConfidence: remain on track

"SMS project in Indonesia and downstream capacity expansion in India remain on track"

regulatory expectationnot yet verifiable

The company expects to receive a positive response on anti-dumping duty in the next few quarters.

Timeframe: next few quartersDirection: positive responseConfidence: we feel... should get

"we feel next few quarters we should get some positive response."

revenue outlookdelivered

The company is extremely confident of meeting its volume growth guidance for the year.

Timeframe: for the yearDirection: meet guidanceConfidence: extremely confident

"we are extremely confident of meeting those numbers."

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged 11.2% across 1 later quarter(s).

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 -1.0% / mo · MACD + · sector +2.7pp vs Nifty (3M)

Stock trend: 45
Sector RS: 64
Sector 3M: +1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

JSLdaily · 1Y · AUTO-4.0%
Latest close ₹737.85 on 2026-09-04
Bar
-0.1%
RSI
58
MACD hist
2.53
52W pos
37%
2026-09-04O ₹738.40H ₹741.25L ₹732.00C ₹737.85Vol 7.8L sh
₹644.77₹685.90₹727.02₹768.15₹809.2852L737.852026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 58. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~1.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 58 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 17% off 52W high · 13% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

50
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
+0.4%
3M return
+10.9%
6M return
-1.2%
1Y return
-2.1%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
+11
Sector rank
#5
Industry rank
#6
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 0.6% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -1.1% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 100.41-0.08%
9298104109115Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26100
RS vs Nifty 500100

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 61 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

61U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation8/30
Growth22/25
Quality12/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
61

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

61/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 38.8%.
  • Growth contributes 22/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 8/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 12/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
18.5
PB
3.1
EV/EBITDA
10.2
ROE
17.7%
ROCE
19.3%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
+38.8%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
61
Previous: 61
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+38.8%
Previous: +39.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -6 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
55
55
64
64
64
64
64
67
67
67
67
61

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹461.26
-60.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
30.6
Growth-justified Value
₹1,205.64
+38.8% MoS
PEG
0.47

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
78Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Management has 100% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 2 checked claims. It ranks around the 86th percentile of the scored universe and 88th percentile within Metals. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 62%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
154 docs text-extracted · 36 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
86th percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 88th pctile, median 70 · Large: 70th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

154 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
100% delivered or partly delivered

2/4 claims checked · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
95
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 62%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 11 years of positive FCF.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • No major Trust Lite risk flags.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
18.50
P/B
3.08
EV/EBITDA
10.23
Market Cap
60830.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
17.70%
ROCE
19.30%
ROA
8.01%
Dividend Y
0.54%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
29.00%
EPS 5Y
55.00%
Revenue 3Y
6.00%
EPS 3Y
15.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.38
Interest Coverage
9.76×
Altman Z
4.17
Book Value
240.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
3395.00 Cr
EPS TTM
39.40

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
62.04%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
37%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Metals, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.