Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 8 Sep - Newspaper Publication in respect of Special Window opened for transfer and dematerlisation of physical securities
Source: Bse
Materials stocks · Micro cap · NSE
JK Lakshmi Cement Limited is an Indian cement manufacturer with operations primarily in North, West, and a small part of East India. The company focuses on grey cement and is undertaking significant capacity expansion projects while also diversifying into adjacent building materials.
SMA20 -7.1% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +9.4% · PAT -28.0% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
PAT -28% YoY · margin compression · Rev +9% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,905 Cr | +9.4% | +0.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹259 Cr | -16.7% | -5.8% |
| Operating margin | 14.0% | -400 bps | +0 bps |
| PAT | ₹108 Cr | -28.0% | -13.6% |
| PAT margin | 5.7% | -295 bps | -90 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 19/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 49. Wait for confirmation.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 50 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Materials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
FY26 cement demand grew 7% pan-India, Q4 volumes up 17% QoQ, but capacity utilization declined to 69%. Surging fuel costs and intense competition restricted price hikes, impacting margins.
The company is pursuing aggressive capacity expansion and efficiency improvements, targeting 30 MTPA by 2030. However, immediate challenges include surging fuel costs, industry overcapacity leading to weak pricing power, and potential delays in project execution. Profitability is under pressure, with Q4 FY26 EBITDA/ton at INR730, below the management's INR1000 ambition.
Ongoing projects in East (Durg, Northeast), and planned projects in Kutch and Nagaur to achieve 30 MTPA by 2030.
Leveraging headroom in Surat (60%+ utilization), Udaipur, and Cuttack to grow higher than industry in FY27.
Rejuvenated legacy brand Green+ and launched Lime Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) to improve market positioning and pricing.
Relentlessly working on renewable energy scale-up, thermal substitution, emission reduction, and digital/AI/ML deployment in manufacturing units.
Commissioned around end of September 2025 (1.35 MTPA added).
Expected to come by end of FY28, including clinker and grinding units. INR500 crores spent by FY26 end.
Clinker and grinding units expected one year after Durg (FY29), with a size slightly higher than 1.5 MTPA.
Expected by FY30, prioritized ahead of Nagaur.
Grew by about 7% in FY26 to 480 million tons, estimated 6% growth for FY27, driven by housing and infrastructure.
April demand was better, and green shoots in demand observed from May 15th onwards after initial sluggishness due to elections.
Highest ever annual capacity addition of 64 million tons in FY26, leading to pan-India utilization of 69% and intense competition.
Pet coke prices up by about 40% QoQ to $160/ton, global coal prices up by about 30% QoQ due to geopolitical situation.
Substantial capacity addition and intense competition restricted meaningful price hikes, especially in geographies where the company operates.
Energy costs expected to rise by at least INR300/ton and packaging cost by INR80-100/ton in coming quarters, with INR100-130/ton impact in Q1.
Middle East conflict causing weak sentiment, surging fuel costs, and potential for higher operational expenditure if sustained.
Despite sector consolidation, cement demand outlook suggests slowdown with pricing power staying weak due to overcapacity and competition.
Nagaur project delayed due to land acquisition and Aravalli issues; Durg railway siding dependent on external agencies.
INR130 crores in other non-current assets from cancelled AMDCL contract; next High Court hearing in July, but recovery timeline uncertain.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
Industry demand growth is primarily discussed YoY (7% for FY26), while Q4 volume growth is highlighted QoQ (17%). Sequential cost increases and demand fluctuations within Q4 and into Q1 make QoQ relevant for momentum, alongside YoY for overall trends.
Estimated at around 69% at the end of March 2026, marginally lower than previous year.
Utilizing capacity more than 60% already, ahead of 18-24 month ramp-up plan, targeting 70%+ this year.
92.26 lakh tons.
24.72 lakh tons.
Reasonably confident of achieving 30 million tons capacity by 2030, with ongoing East projects well on track.
Expects to grow higher than the industry in FY27 by ramping up Surat, Udaipur, and Cuttack capacities and improving blended cement ratio.
Aims to reduce the EBITDA gap with industry leaders by another INR50-75 in FY27 through internal actions and efficiency levers.
Strategy is to expand into adjacent building materials like tile adhesives, plastering solutions, AAC blocks, and RMC to offer a portfolio of products.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA per ton | Q4 FY26: INR730 | Improvement towards INR1000 target and reduction of gap with industry leaders (target INR50-75 reduction in FY27). |
| Surat Plant Utilization | Currently >60% | Ramp-up to 70%+ utilization this year, as per management's target. |
| Cost Inflation vs. Price Hikes | Q1 expected INR100-130/ton cost inflation | Ability to effectively pass on cost increases through price hikes, especially in the trade segment, given volatile external factors. |
| Durg & Northeast Project Timelines | Durg by FY28 end, Northeast by FY29 | Adherence to commissioning schedules and capital expenditure phasing (FY27: INR1500-1700cr, FY28: ~INR2000cr). |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 47th percentile within Materials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 39/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Materials: 47th pctile, median 70 · Micro: 38th pctile, median 73
88 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Company Ir
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse