Skip to content

JK Lakshmi Cement Limited (JKLAKSHMI)

Micro Cap

Materials stocks · Micro cap · NSE

JK Lakshmi Cement Limited is an Indian cement manufacturer with operations primarily in North, West, and a small part of East India. The company focuses on grey cement and is undertaking significant capacity expansion projects while also diversifying into adjacent building materials.

₹491.05
+12.80 · +2.68%
Market cap ₹5,935 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals17 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result05 Aug, 10:10 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Materials P/E 28.8 (n=19)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

32Bearish

SMA20 -7.1% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 37
Sector RS: 26
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

JKLAKSHMID candles · FIT view-23.3%
Latest close ₹491.05 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+2.1%
RSI
49
MACD hist
2.50
52W pos
7%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹481.00H ₹497.95L ₹477.00C ₹491.05Vol 1.7L sh
₹450.22₹511.97₹573.72₹635.48₹697.2352L₹491.052026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

JKLAKSHMINifty CommoditiesNifty 500
-20%-12%-4%+4%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026JKLAKSHMI -14.1%Nifty Commodities -9.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
JKLAKSHMI
-14.1%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Commodities
-9.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-8.5 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-44.5%
₹885
52W range position
7%
₹461.5 - ₹885
ATR (14)
2.7%
₹13.1
Volume vs 20D
1.31x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹6.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹461.5 - ₹532.9
27.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
50

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +9.4% · PAT -28.0% YoY

Technical
Bearish
32

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+63.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
69

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -28% YoY · margin compression · Rev +9% YoY

Filed 05 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,905 Cr+9.4%+0.2%
EBITDA₹259 Cr-16.7%-5.8%
Operating margin14.0%-400 bps+0 bps
PAT₹108 Cr-28.0%-13.6%
PAT margin5.7%-295 bps-90 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
15.40
P/B
1.53
EV/EBITDA
6.68
Market Cap
5935.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
10.70%
ROCE
12.00%
ROA
4.34%
Dividend Y
1.36%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
7.00%
EPS 5Y
11.09%
Revenue 3Y
2.00%
EPS 3Y
5.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.67
Interest Coverage
4.51×
Altman Z
2.73
Book Value
313.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
5.91%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
1082.00 Cr
EPS TTM
29.79

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
45.12%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
4%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 6,763+9.2% vs prev
06788Mar 2017: 2,922Mar 2018: 3,748Mar 2019: 4,316Mar 2020: 4,364Mar 2021: 4,727Mar 2022: 5,420Mar 2023: 6,452Mar 2024: 6,788Mar 2025: 6,193Mar 2026: 6,763FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 413+49.6% vs prev
0488.0Mar 2017: 87.0Mar 2018: 43.0Mar 2019: 41.0Mar 2020: 253Mar 2021: 421Mar 2022: 478Mar 2023: 369Mar 2024: 488Mar 2025: 276Mar 2026: 413FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 666+9268.9% vs prev
0666.1Mar 2017: 6.2%Mar 2018: 3.0%Mar 2019: 2.8%Mar 2020: 15.0%Mar 2021: 16.8%Mar 2022: 17.1%Mar 2023: 11.2%Mar 2024: 13.7%Mar 2025: 7.1%Mar 2026: 666%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 49. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 49 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 45% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

13
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-7.4%
3M return
-14.1%
6M return
-25.6%
1Y return
-41.5%
RS 1D
+3
RS 20D
0
Sector rank
#19
Industry rank
#76
Stage evidence
  • Price is 14.8% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.7%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 59.57+3.74%
55677991103Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2660
RS vs Nifty 50060

Valuation & peers

U-Score 50 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

50U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation17/30
Growth10/25
Quality2/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
50

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

50/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 5.9%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 63.4%.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 10/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
15.4
PB
1.5
EV/EBITDA
6.7
ROE
10.7%
ROCE
12.0%
FCF Yield
5.9%
Debt/Equity
0.7
MoS
+63.4%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
50
Previous: 50
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+63.4%
Previous: +63.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
49
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹458.04
-7.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹1,340.55
+63.4% MoS
PEG
1.78

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Materials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
BIRLACORPN
Micro
Birla Corporation Limited
Cement
match 159
48
11.1
7.8%
-101%
FAIR VALUE
INDIACEM
Large
The India Cements Limited
Cement
match 158
23
58.9
0.4%
-4362%
OVERVALUED
AMBUJACEM
Large
Ambuja Cements Limited
Cement
match 148
48
18.4
8.8%
+53%
FAIR VALUE
JKCEMENT
Large
JK Cement Limited
Cement
match 147
38
38.7
15.6%
-143%
WATCHLIST
MANGLMCEM
Small
Mangalam Cement Limited
Cement
match 146
41
21.0
16.3%
+26%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T09:38:52.740Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 cement demand grew 7% pan-India, Q4 volumes up 17% QoQ, but capacity utilization declined to 69%. Surging fuel costs and intense competition restricted price hikes, impacting margins.

The company is pursuing aggressive capacity expansion and efficiency improvements, targeting 30 MTPA by 2030. However, immediate challenges include surging fuel costs, industry overcapacity leading to weak pricing power, and potential delays in project execution. Profitability is under pressure, with Q4 FY26 EBITDA/ton at INR730, below the management's INR1000 ambition.

Growth engines

Capacity Expansion

Ongoing projects in East (Durg, Northeast), and planned projects in Kutch and Nagaur to achieve 30 MTPA by 2030.

Utilization Ramp-up

Leveraging headroom in Surat (60%+ utilization), Udaipur, and Cuttack to grow higher than industry in FY27.

Premium Product Focus

Rejuvenated legacy brand Green+ and launched Lime Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) to improve market positioning and pricing.

Efficiency Improvements

Relentlessly working on renewable energy scale-up, thermal substitution, emission reduction, and digital/AI/ML deployment in manufacturing units.

Capacity and execution

Surat Grinding Unit

Commissioned around end of September 2025 (1.35 MTPA added).

Durg Expansion (East)

Expected to come by end of FY28, including clinker and grinding units. INR500 crores spent by FY26 end.

Northeast Project

Clinker and grinding units expected one year after Durg (FY29), with a size slightly higher than 1.5 MTPA.

Kutch Project

Expected by FY30, prioritized ahead of Nagaur.

Tailwinds

Pan-India Cement Demand Growth

Grew by about 7% in FY26 to 480 million tons, estimated 6% growth for FY27, driven by housing and infrastructure.

Improving Demand Sentiment

April demand was better, and green shoots in demand observed from May 15th onwards after initial sluggishness due to elections.

Headwinds

Industry Overcapacity

Highest ever annual capacity addition of 64 million tons in FY26, leading to pan-India utilization of 69% and intense competition.

Surging Fuel Costs

Pet coke prices up by about 40% QoQ to $160/ton, global coal prices up by about 30% QoQ due to geopolitical situation.

Restricted Price Hikes

Substantial capacity addition and intense competition restricted meaningful price hikes, especially in geographies where the company operates.

Expected Cost Increases

Energy costs expected to rise by at least INR300/ton and packaging cost by INR80-100/ton in coming quarters, with INR100-130/ton impact in Q1.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Volatility

Middle East conflict causing weak sentiment, surging fuel costs, and potential for higher operational expenditure if sustained.

Pricing Power Weakness

Despite sector consolidation, cement demand outlook suggests slowdown with pricing power staying weak due to overcapacity and competition.

Project Execution Delays

Nagaur project delayed due to land acquisition and Aravalli issues; Durg railway siding dependent on external agencies.

AMDCL Contract Recovery

INR130 crores in other non-current assets from cancelled AMDCL contract; next High Court hearing in July, but recovery timeline uncertain.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

Industry demand growth is primarily discussed YoY (7% for FY26), while Q4 volume growth is highlighted QoQ (17%). Sequential cost increases and demand fluctuations within Q4 and into Q1 make QoQ relevant for momentum, alongside YoY for overall trends.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Pan-India Capacity Utilization

Estimated at around 69% at the end of March 2026, marginally lower than previous year.

Surat Plant Utilization

Utilizing capacity more than 60% already, ahead of 18-24 month ramp-up plan, targeting 70%+ this year.

FY26 Clinker Production

92.26 lakh tons.

Q4 FY26 Clinker Production

24.72 lakh tons.

Management forward view

30 MTPA Target by 2030

Reasonably confident of achieving 30 million tons capacity by 2030, with ongoing East projects well on track.

FY27 Growth Outlook

Expects to grow higher than the industry in FY27 by ramping up Surat, Udaipur, and Cuttack capacities and improving blended cement ratio.

EBITDA Gap Reduction

Aims to reduce the EBITDA gap with industry leaders by another INR50-75 in FY27 through internal actions and efficiency levers.

Adjacent Building Materials

Strategy is to expand into adjacent building materials like tile adhesives, plastering solutions, AAC blocks, and RMC to offer a portfolio of products.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
EBITDA per tonQ4 FY26: INR730Improvement towards INR1000 target and reduction of gap with industry leaders (target INR50-75 reduction in FY27).
Surat Plant UtilizationCurrently >60%Ramp-up to 70%+ utilization this year, as per management's target.
Cost Inflation vs. Price HikesQ1 expected INR100-130/ton cost inflationAbility to effectively pass on cost increases through price hikes, especially in the trade segment, given volatile external factors.
Durg & Northeast Project TimelinesDurg by FY28 end, Northeast by FY29Adherence to commissioning schedules and capital expenditure phasing (FY27: INR1500-1700cr, FY28: ~INR2000cr).

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
69Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 47th percentile within Materials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 39/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
88 docs text-extracted · 71 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
59th percentile

overall median 67 · Materials: 47th pctile, median 70 · Micro: 38th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

88 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
39
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 5.5%.
  • ▸8 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

12 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 8 Sep - Newspaper Publication in respect of Special Window opened for transfer and dematerlisation of physical securities

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Transcript

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationAug 2026

Aug 2026 · PPT

Source: Company Ir

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Board Meeting Outcome for Outcome Of Board Meeting 2d - FY26 audited results approved; ₹6.50 dividend recommended; Assam MDO contract cancelled, legal recovery initiated.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Directorate 20 May - Board approved Vinita Singhania’s five-year reappointment as Managing Director from 1 August 2026, subject to AGM approval.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Acquisition 5 Aug - Board approved up to ₹20.50 crore investment in STLC RE 1 Ltd for a 29MW solar plant and 28MWh BESS at Sirohi.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJul 2026

Jul 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 3 Jul - Newspaper Publication of 86th Annual General Meeting to be held on 30th July 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 7 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 6 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 5 Aug - Board approved Q1 FY27 results and 3,000 crore Durg expansion; railway siding costs 325 crore.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 24 Jun - Submission of Notice to Shareholders for transfer of Equity Shares of the Company to Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 12 Jun - Chhattisgarh GST appeal on ₹16.26 crore demand for FY20 decided in JK Lakshmi Cement’s favor.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.