Skip to content

Ambuja Cements Limited (AMBUJACEM)

Large Cap

Materials stocks · Large cap · NSE

Ambuja Cements is the ninth largest global building material solutions company, part of the diversified Adani Portfolio. It operates in the Indian cement sector, focusing on manufacturing and selling cement and related products.

₹359.9
-1.95 · -0.54%
Market cap ₹86,683 Cr
IndicesNifty 500
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals14 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result28 Jul, 07:53 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Materials P/E 28.8 (n=19)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

25Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.8% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector -3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 26
Sector RS: 24
Sector 3M: -9.5% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

AMBUJACEMD candles · FIT view-21.8%
Latest close ₹359.90 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-0.3%
RSI
43
MACD hist
1.83
52W pos
8%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹361.00H ₹362.15L ₹353.00C ₹359.90Vol 12.0L sh
₹334.61₹369.75₹404.90₹440.05₹475.1952L₹359.902026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

AMBUJACEMNifty CommoditiesNifty 500
-25%-15%-5%+4%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026AMBUJACEM -18.4%Nifty Commodities -10.2%Nifty 500 -6.5%
AMBUJACEM
-18.4%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Commodities
-10.2%
Vs Nifty 500
-11.9 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-38.9%
₹588.8
52W range position
8%
₹341 - ₹588.8
ATR (14)
2.7%
₹9.9
Volume vs 20D
0.57x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹76.8 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹341 - ₹394
31.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
48

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -7.7% · PAT -36.6% YoY

Technical
Bearish
25

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+53.3%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
69

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -8% YoY · PAT -37% YoY · margin compression

Filed 28 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹9,500 Cr-7.7%-13.0%
EBITDA₹1,589 Cr-19.0%+8.5%
Operating margin17.0%-200 bps+400 bps
PAT₹660 Cr-36.6%-64.5%
PAT margin7.0%-317 bps-1006 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
18.40
P/B
1.45
EV/EBITDA
8.89
Market Cap
86683.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
8.85%
ROCE
5.61%
ROA
5.83%
Dividend Y
0.57%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
11.00%
EPS 5Y
15.00%
Revenue 3Y
1.00%
EPS 3Y
21.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.01
Interest Coverage
28.82×
Altman Z
3.55
Book Value
240.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
5362.00 Cr
EPS TTM
17.83

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
67.33%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
3%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 9,500-13.0% vs prev
011kSep 2023: 7,424Dec 2023: 8,129Mar 2024: 8,894Jun 2024: 8,392Sep 2024: 7,552Dec 2024: 9,411Mar 2025: 9,981Jun 2025: 10.3kSep 2025: 9,174Dec 2025: 10.3kMar 2026: 10.9kJun 2026: 9,500Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 660-64.5% vs prev
02663Sep 2023: 987Dec 2023: 1,091Mar 2024: 1,521Jun 2024: 783Sep 2024: 496Dec 2024: 2,663Mar 2025: 1,351Jun 2025: 1,041Sep 2025: 2,302Dec 2025: 403Mar 2026: 1,857Jun 2026: 660Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 43. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~9.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 39% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

9
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-7.9%
3M return
-18.4%
6M return
-20.1%
1Y return
-37.1%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#22
Stage evidence
  • Price is 14.0% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.2%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 66.66+0.38%
62728393103Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2667
RS vs Nifty 50067

Valuation & peers

U-Score 48 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

48U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation12/30
Growth14/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
48

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

48/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 53.3%.
  • Balance sheet contributes 12/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 12/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
18.4
PB
1.4
EV/EBITDA
8.9
ROE
8.8%
ROCE
5.6%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+53.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
48
Previous: 48
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+53.3%
Previous: +53.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹310.29
-16.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
43.2
Growth-justified Value
₹770.26
+53.3% MoS
PEG
1.06

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Materials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
JKCEMENT
Large
JK Cement Limited
Cement
match 170
38
38.7
15.6%
-143%
WATCHLIST
INDIACEM
Large
The India Cements Limited
Cement
match 165
23
58.9
0.4%
-4362%
OVERVALUED
JKLAKSHMI
Micro
JK Lakshmi Cement Limited
Cement
match 157
50
15.4
10.7%
+63%
FAIR VALUE
ACC
Large
ACC Limited
Cement
match 156
57
11.2
10.9%
+30%
FAIR VALUE
DALBHARAT
Large
Dalmia Bharat Limited
Cement
match 156
24
28.8
6.1%
-417%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-12T07:39:07.918Z
Management commentary snapshot

Ambuja Cements reported highest ever annual sales volume of 73.7 MT (+16% YoY) and EBITDA of INR 6,539 crores (+31% YoY) for FY26. However, Q4 FY26 saw higher costs and muted volume growth, with acquired assets underperforming expectations.

The thesis is under stress due to significant cost overruns in FY26, particularly in Q4, and delays in turnaround of acquired assets. While management projects cost improvements and volume growth for FY27, the ability to execute on these internal factors amidst a soft industry demand and pricing pressure remains a key concern.

Growth engines

Premiumization Strategy

Premium cement accounted for 35% of trade sales during FY26, reflecting sustained progress. Q4 premium cement sales were 36% of trade sales.

Capacity Expansion

Cement capacity increased to 109 MT in FY26, with a target of 119 MT by end of FY27 through ongoing additions.

Acquired Asset Integration

Successful amalgamation of Sanghi Industries and Penna Cement completed, with ACC and Orient Cement under process, forming 'One Cement platform'.

Cost Optimization from Green Energy

Green power share increased to 32% in Q4, expected to contribute to INR 150-200 savings along with raw material costs.

Capacity and execution

FY26 Grinding Capacity Additions

Commissioned 10.7 million tonnes of new grinding capacity at Marwar, Farakka, Sankrail, Sindri, and Krishnapatnam.

FY26 Clinker Capacity Additions

Added clinker capacity of 7 million tonnes at Jodhpur and Bhatapara.

FY27 Grinding Capacity Target

Expecting to hit capacity of almost 119 million tonnes by end of FY27 with proposed ongoing additions of 10 million tonnes of GU.

Future Clinker Projects

Won a limestone block in Assam and planning a new clinker line in Mundra, both new territories/projects.

Tailwinds

Industry Consolidation & Reforms

FY26 was marked by industry consolidation and GST 2.0 reforms, which can lead to a more structured market.

Infrastructure Growth

India's long-term infrastructure story remains fundamentally very strong and secular.

Cost Savings Potential

INR 150 to INR 200 savings expected from raw material cost (fly ash) and green energy utilization.

Headwinds

Soft Demand & Pricing Pressure

Cement demand is expected to remain a little soft in FY27 due to inflationary pressure and weak monsoon. Industry is under relentless pressure and not able to pass on price increases.

Higher Operating Costs

Higher freight, packing, and fuel costs, along with increased additional goods tax in some states, led to cost escalation in Q4 FY26.

Acquired Asset Underperformance

Newly acquired assets, particularly Sanghi and Penna, witnessed lower utilization levels and required higher than expected time/capex for maintenance and upkeep.

Efficiency Capex Delays

There is a 3 to 6 months delay on some of the efficiency capexes, impacting cost improvement timelines.

Risk radar

Execution Risk on Acquired Assets

Turnaround initiatives for Sanghi and Penna took longer than expected, and these assets still require significant effort to reach desired utilization and cost efficiency levels.

Inability to Pass on Costs

Despite cost increases, the industry is under relentless pressure and unable to pass on price hikes, potentially impacting margins.

Global Geopolitical & Economic Volatility

Ongoing global geopolitical situations, energy costs, and expected hikes in fuel/diesel make long-term cost estimates difficult and could lead to further cost escalations.

Delayed Infrastructure for Raw Materials

Pending railway infrastructure has prevented the company from optimizing raw material costs, specifically for fly ash.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is useful for assessing overall annual growth and financial performance, especially for a seasonal business. However, QoQ is crucial for tracking sequential momentum, cost trends, and the integration progress of recently acquired assets, which significantly impact comparability for full-year figures.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Annual Sales Volume

Achieved highest ever annual sales volume of 73.7 million tonnes, up 16% Y-on-Y in FY26.

EBITDA per Metric Ton

Normalized EBITDA of INR 887 per metric ton (PMT) for FY26, up 12% Y-on-Y.

Cement Capacity

Company's cement capacity increased to 109 million tonnes in FY26.

Acquired Asset Utilization (Sanghi)

Sanghi Industries utilization remains at around 57% on cement capacity.

Management forward view

FY27 Strategic Focus

Focus firmly remains on streamlining operations, margin expansion, increasing trade sales, and premium product sales.

Acquired Asset Improvement

Target to increase utilization of Sanghi and Penna (19 MT combined capacity) by at least 5% to 10%.

Calibrated Capex Approach

Recalibrating capacity expansion plans to first optimize current capacities and take advantage of railway policies on bulk cement terminals, ensuring disciplined capital allocation.

Commitment to Internal Execution

Management is hyper-focused on improving performance gaps, stating that FY27 guidance is 100% controllable by internal execution.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Cost per TonneINR 4,500/tonne (Q4 FY26 peak)Progressive improvement and achievement of INR 150-200 savings from fly ash and green energy in coming quarters.
Acquired Asset UtilizationSanghi ~57%, Penna ~46%Increase in utilization by 5-10% for these assets, indicating successful turnaround and integration.
FY27 Volume GrowthTarget 8% growth to 80 million tonnesAchievement of volume targets, especially given the anticipated soft industry demand of 5-5.5%.
Capacity Commissioning & Stabilization10 MT GU additions by end FY27Timely commissioning and stabilization of new grinding capacities, contributing to volume ramp-up.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
69Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 47th percentile within Materials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 38/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 21 Oct 2026
management-trust-v1
134 docs text-extracted · 30 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
59th percentile

overall median 67 · Materials: 47th pctile, median 70 · Large: 35th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

134 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
38
weak · capital discipline
Results
53
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 67.3%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸7 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.01.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 5.6%.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -4.4%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

7 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 28 Aug - Ambuja Cements Limited has informed about copy of Newspaper Publication intimating completion of dispatch of notice of National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT") Convened Meeting.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 27 Aug - Ambuja Cements Limited has informed about Copy of Newspaper Publication intimating completion of dispatch of notice of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) convened meeting.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 20 Aug - Ind-Ra assigned IND AAA/Stable and IND A1+ ratings to ₹70,000 million bank facilities.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 4 Aug - ICRA assigned AAA/A1+ ratings to Ambuja Cements’ Rs7,000 crore bank facilities.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 14 Jul - Post Results call with Investors / Analyst.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.