IP
IndiaPulse

Jain Resource Recycling Limited (JAINREC)

Large Cap

Metals stocks · Large cap · NSE

Jain Resource Recycling Limited is one of India’s largest and fastest-growing non-ferrous metal recycling companies, with a legacy spanning over seven decades. It operates 5 recycling plants, processing lead, copper, and aluminum, with a strategic focus on value-added copper products and sustainability initiatives.

₹277.95
-1.85 · -0.66%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Metals P/E 20.4 (n=89)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
55

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
73

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
40

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
95

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 52/100

margin compression · Rev +76% YoY · PAT +21% YoY

Filed 03 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,724 Cr+75.9%-12.3%
EBITDA₹108 Cr+20.0%-1.8%
Operating margin4.0%-200 bps+50 bps
PAT₹69 Cr+21.1%+4.5%
PAT margin2.5%-115 bps+40 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T17:54:06.251Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 saw robust revenue growth of 48% YoY to Rs. 9,543 crore, with EBITDA up 53% YoY to Rs. 558 crore and PAT up 56% YoY to Rs. 347 crore. Q4FY26 revenue surged 76% YoY to Rs. 3,105 crore, but EBITDA grew only 18% YoY to Rs. 110 crore, and PAT rose 26% YoY to Rs. 66 crore, indicating significant margin compression.

While FY26 delivered strong top-line and bottom-line growth, Q4FY26 results show concerning EBITDA/MT compression across key segments, particularly copper. Management attributes this to temporary global realization formula declines and West Asia supply chain disruptions, with expected normalization in Q1 FY27. Project execution faces marginal delays due to geopolitical events, requiring close monitoring of commissioning timelines and margin recovery.

Current business mix

Product-wise Revenue Split (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.

Businessmix
Copper & Copper ingots55.0%
Lead & Lead alloy ingots40.0%
Aluminium & Aluminium alloys1.0%
Others4.0%
Growth engines

Forward Integration into Copper Value-Added Products

Expands presence across the copper value chain, focuses on higher value-added products, supports margin improvement and customer integration.

Specialty Metal & Plastic Recycling Expansion

Antimony project (1,000 MT Lead-Antimony bullion processing) and dedicated plastic recycling facility (6 acres land, ~Rs. 15 cr capex).

Strategic JV & International Expansion

JV with C&Y Group Investments Inc. for copper scrap recycling in Ahmedabad (72,000 MT annual processing capacity). Kuwait investment for Middle East recycling ecosystem.

Government Incentives & Policies

Mandate for minimum 5% recycled content in new non-ferrous metal products from FY28, and India’s Rs. 1,500 crore Critical Mineral Recycling Scheme.

Capacity and execution

Copper Anode Expansion

First furnace (800 MT/month) commissioned in Q4 FY26. Second furnace (800 MT/month) expected Q1 FY27.

Copper Cathode Expansion

Civil construction complete, machinery installation progressing, commissioning expected July 2026 (Q3 FY27).

Copper Wire Rod Project

Civil work nearing completion, machinery erection scheduled June 2026, commissioning expected August 2026 (Q2 FY27).

Copper Busbar Project

Civil work nearing completion, machinery erection scheduled July 2026, commissioning expected September 2026 (Q2 FY27).

Tailwinds

Government Mandate for Recycled Content

All new non-ferrous metal products must contain a minimum of 5% recycled content starting FY28.

Energy Efficiency of Recycling

Aluminium recycling saves up to 95% energy, copper up to 85%, lead reduces CO2 by 99%, tin saves 99% energy vs. primary production.

National Critical Mineral Mission Policy

India’s Rs. 1,500 crore scheme aims to boost domestic recycling and reduce import dependence.

EPR Framework for Non-Ferrous Metals

Recycling of non-ferrous metal scrap eligible for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) points from April 1, 2026.

Headwinds

West Asia Crisis Shipping Disruptions

Temporary logistical challenges and delays in machinery delivery for Copper Cathode, Wire Rod, Busbar, and Kuwait investment projects.

Global Sectoral Realisation Decline

Sale realization as a percentage of LME deteriorated by 1.25% to 1.50% in Q4 due to sharp LME copper price surge.

Increased Input Costs

Geopolitical conflict triggered steep rise in global oil and gas prices, increasing per-MT production cost in Q4.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Disruptions

Ongoing West Asia crisis causing delays in machinery delivery and shipping schedules for multiple expansion projects.

Commodity Price Volatility

Business operations are directly impacted by fluctuations in base metal prices traded on the London Metal Exchange, affecting profitability.

Margin Compression

Q4FY26 saw significant EBITDA/MT compression due to realization formula decline and supply chain disruptions, impacting profitability.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is essential to assess the company's strategic growth and market share gains over a full year, especially in the context of its copper segment expansion. QoQ comparison is critical for understanding sequential momentum, utilization, and the immediate impact of market dynamics and geopolitical events on spreads and profitability, as evidenced by the Q4 margin compression.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue from Operations (FY26)

Rs. 9,543.1 crore, +48.4% YoY

EBITDA (FY26)

Rs. 558.9 crore, +53.1% YoY, EBITDA margin ~6.0%

PAT (FY26)

Rs. 347.4 crore, +55.6% YoY, PAT margin ~3.6%

Copper & Copper Ingots Volume (FY26)

53,702 MT, +34% YoY

Management forward view

Highest-Ever Annual Performance

Crossed the Rs. 9,000 crore revenue milestone in FY26 for the first time, achieving highest-ever annual performance.

Strategic Focus on Copper

Copper segment contributed ~55% of total revenue during Q4, reflecting continued emphasis on expanding its copper business.

Project Execution Progress

Overall implementation remains broadly in line with guidance, despite temporary logistical challenges.

Q4 Margin Compression Temporary

Expects Q1 FY27 negotiations to recalibrate formula percentages and shipping costs to normalize, confident compression will not carry forward.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Copper Segment Contribution55% of Q4FY26 revenueSustained growth and margin contribution from copper value-added products as new capacities ramp up.
EBITDA/MTSignificant compression in Q4FY26Normalization of EBITDA/MT in Q1 FY27 as per management's reassurance regarding realization and supply chain costs.
Project Commissioning TimelinesMarginal delays due to West Asia crisisActual commissioning dates for Copper Cathode (July 2026), Wire Rod (Aug 2026), Busbar (Sep 2026), and Plastic Recycling (Q3 FY27).
Net Debt to Equity Ratio0.7x (FY26)Deleveraging trend as expansion capex is deployed and internal accruals grow, especially post-IPO capital infusion.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

40Neutral

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -12.8% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector +2.7pp vs Nifty (3M)

Stock trend: 24
Sector RS: 64
Sector 3M: +1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

JAINRECdaily · 1Y · AUTO-33.1%
Latest close ₹277.95 on 2026-09-04

Daily history is available from 2025-10-01; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.

Bar
-0.9%
RSI
33
MACD hist
0.34
52W pos
9%
2026-09-04O ₹280.55H ₹282.30L ₹276.15C ₹277.95Vol 11.4L sh
₹256.48₹344.87₹433.25₹521.64₹610.0252H277.952026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 33.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~14.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 33 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 53% off 52W high · 12% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

4
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-9.9%
3M return
-24.6%
6M return
-35.1%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#5
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 27.7% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.6%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
unranked
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
230 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 86.16-0.67%
80107134161188Oct 25Jan 26May 26Sept 2686
RS vs Nifty 50086

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 55 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

55U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation4/30
Growth21/25
Quality19/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
55

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

55/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 13.0%.
  • Quality contributes 19/20 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 21/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Cash flow is weaker at 0/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 4/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 7/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
26.3
PB
6.2
EV/EBITDA
18.4
ROE
30.4%
ROCE
25.7%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.8
MoS
+13.0%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
55
Previous: 55
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+13.0%
Previous: +14.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
50
50
55
55
55
53
55
55
55
55
55
55

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹103.04
-169.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
30.6
Growth-justified Value
₹319.46
+13.0% MoS
PEG
0.56

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
73Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 72nd percentile of the scored universe and 65th percentile within Metals. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 28/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 73.6%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-591 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
19 docs text-extracted · 6 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
72nd percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 65th pctile, median 70 · Large: 51st pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

19 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
90
strong · capital discipline
Results
95
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 73.6%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ROCE is 25.7%.
  • 4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-591 Cr.
  • Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
26.30
P/B
6.15
EV/EBITDA
18.36
Market Cap
9592.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
30.40%
ROCE
25.70%
ROA
10.64%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
36.76%
EPS 5Y
40.65%
Revenue 3Y
46.00%
EPS 3Y
56.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.82
Interest Coverage
5.88×
Altman Z
7.51
Book Value
45.20

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
-591.00 Cr
EPS TTM
10.44

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
73.59%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
9%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Metals, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.