Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 16 Oct - Announcement under Regulation 30(LODR)- Newspaper Publication- Un-audited Financial Results for Q2 and Half Year ended 30.09.2026
Source: Bse
Financial Services stocks · Large cap · NSE
IRFC is registered with RBI as a systemically important NBFC-ND-IFC, majorly owned by GoI through MoR. It is the dedicated market borrowing arm for Indian Railways, financing rolling stock, leasing railway infrastructure, and lending to other MoR entities.
full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -5.1% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +23.4% · PAT +10.2% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +23% YoY · PAT +10% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹7,866.4 Cr | +23.4% | -4.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹7,819.6 Cr | NDF | -4.9% |
| Operating margin | 99.4% | NDF | -9 bps |
| PAT | ₹1,958.5 Cr | +10.2% | +1.6% |
| PAT margin | 24.9% | -299 bps | +157 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 42.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 29 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
IRFC reported a 7.80% YoY increase in PAT to INR 7,009.17 Cr for FY25-26, with Revenue from Operations up 0.49% to INR 27,284.15 Cr. AUM grew 5.34% to INR 4,84,616.77 Cr, and NIM stood at 1.50%.
IRFC maintains its strategic role as the dedicated financier for Indian Railways, demonstrating consistent financial performance with strong asset quality (NIL GNPA). Diversification into non-MoR infrastructure financing presents a new growth avenue, though its impact on overall risk profile needs monitoring.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.
Executed agreements worth ₹72,949 crore and disbursed ₹35,067 crore in non-MoR business in FY25-26, significantly scaling up diversified financing.
Targeting critical Railway ecosystem infrastructure such as PPP projects, metros, station development, first-last mile connectivity, and ports.
Funding renewable energy for the Railway Network is identified as an opportunity.
Executed agreements worth ₹72,949 crore in FY25-26 for diversified infrastructure financing.
Disbursed ₹35,067 crore in FY25-26 for non-MoR business, creating a diversified infrastructure lending portfolio pipeline.
IRFC is the dedicated market borrowing arm for the Indian Railways.
MoR is required to provide for any shortfall in funding under the Standard Lease Agreement.
Exempted from RBI's asset classification, provisioning, and exposure norms for direct MoR exposure, and not required to pay MAT.
Enjoys highest credit rating (AAA) for an Indian issuer from ICRA, CRISIL & CARE.
92.56% of AUM is exposure to MoR, though management states it has minimal credit risk due to MoR backing.
Impairment on Financial Instruments rose significantly to INR 124.03 Cr in FY25-26 from INR 0.68 Cr in FY24-25.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
The document provides annual financial statements and performance highlights for the year ended March 31, 2026, with comparisons to the previous fiscal year (FY24-25), indicating a focus on annual performance trends.
AUM grew to INR 4,84,616.77 Cr in FY25-26 from INR 4,60,047.84 Cr in FY24-25, a 5.34% YoY increase.
Total disbursements for FY25-26 were INR 35,067 Cr, significantly up from INR 732 Cr in FY24-25.
Annualized NIM for FY25-26 was 1.50%.
Company claims competitive cost of borrowing due to strong credit ratings and diversified funding sources.
Management states IRFC is transforming to a diversified financier supporting broader infrastructure within the Railway ecosystem.
IRFC has entered into MoUs with various entities like VOCPA, SFCL, RITES, DMRC, IIFCL, REMCL, MMRDA & JNPT for strategic collaboration.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Non-MoR Disbursements | ₹35,067 Cr (FY25-26) | Continued growth and diversification of disbursements beyond MoR. |
| Impairment on Financial Instruments | INR 124.03 Cr (FY25-26) | Trend in impairment charges, especially with increasing non-MoR exposure. |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 1.50% (FY25-26) | Stability or improvement in NIM amidst diversified funding and lending. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 13th percentile of the scored universe and 21st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 21st pctile, median 62 · Large: 6th pctile, median 73
70 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse