Skip to content

GTL Infrastructure Limited (GTLINFRA)

Small Cap

Infra stocks · Small cap · NSE

GTL Infrastructure Limited operates in Telecom Towers, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹1
-0.02 · -1.96%
Market cap ₹1,358 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 02:02 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 02:02 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result06 Aug, 09:38 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage10/14 · 71%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

25Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.3% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -2.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 35
Sector 3M: -8.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GTLINFRAD candles · FIT view-18.7%TODAY · PROVISIONAL
Latest price ₹1.00 on 2026-10-21

Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.

Bar
-2.9%
RSI
28
MACD hist
-0.00
52W pos
6%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹1.03H ₹1.03L ₹1.00C ₹1.00Vol 2.5Cr shIntraday candle
₹0.95₹1.14₹1.33₹1.53₹1.7252H52L₹1.002026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GTLINFRANifty InfraNifty 500
-21%-11%-2%+7%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026GTLINFRA -18.4%Nifty Infra -8.2%Nifty 500 -5.6%
GTLINFRA
-18.4%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Infra
-8.2%
Vs Nifty 500
-12.8 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-38.9%
₹1.7
52W range position
8%
₹1 - ₹1.7
ATR (14)
3.5%
₹0
Volume vs 20D
1.29x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹3.3 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹1 - ₹1.2
23.8% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
47

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -2.4% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
25

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+94.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
67

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -2% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 06 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹327 Cr-2.4%-0.9%
EBITDA₹143 Cr+78.8%+186.0%
Operating margin44.0%+2000 bps+2900 bps
PAT₹69 CrNDF-94.2%
PAT margin21.1%+9035 bps-33829 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
—
EV/EBITDA
11.61
Market Cap
1358.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
—
ROCE
—
ROA
34.59%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-1.00%
EPS 5Y
8.00%
Revenue 3Y
-2.00%
EPS 3Y
15.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
1.19×
Altman Z
-0.45
Book Value
-4.07

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
39.99%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
535.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.85

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
3.28%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
14%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 1,372+2.1% vs prev
02333Mar 2017: 2,283Mar 2018: 2,333Mar 2019: 1,500Mar 2020: 1,417Mar 2021: 1,410Mar 2022: 1,463Mar 2023: 1,458Mar 2024: 1,372Mar 2025: 1,344Mar 2026: 1,372FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 779+189.0% vs prev
-18930779.0Mar 2017: -1,399Mar 2018: -1,893Mar 2019: -1,539Mar 2020: -1,864Mar 2021: -1,271Mar 2022: -1,475Mar 2023: -1,817Mar 2024: -681Mar 2025: -875Mar 2026: 779FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: -92.2-56.3% vs prev
-92.20Mar 2018: -59.0%Mar 2019: -92.2%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 28.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~9.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 28 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

24
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-11.3%
3M return
-18.4%
6M return
-18.4%
1Y return
-29.7%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-8
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 17.8% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -0.2% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 70.62-0.91%
647688100112Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2671
RS vs Nifty 50071

Valuation & peers

U-Score 47 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

47U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation22/30
Growth10/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
47

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

47/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 40.0%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 94.0%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is -0.5, in distress territory.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 3/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
—
PB
—
EV/EBITDA
11.6
ROE
—
ROCE
—
FCF Yield
40.0%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+94.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
47
Previous: 47
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+94.0%
Previous: +93.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
19.6
Growth-justified Value
₹16.62
+94.0% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
INDUSTOWER
Mid
Indus Towers Limited
Telecom Infrastructure
match 50
73
14.1
18.6%
+69%
UNDERVALUED
GALAPREC
Small
Gala Precision Engineering Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 30
40
39.1
13.2%
-59%
WATCHLIST
GPTINFRA
Small
GPT Infraprojects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 30
59
15.4
17.3%
+33%
FAIR VALUE
GAYAPROJ
Small
Gayatri Projects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 29
47
8.0
—
+94%
FAIR VALUE
CAPACITE
Small
Capacit'e Infraprojects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 29
72
8.2
10.4%
+67%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

GTL Infrastructure Limited operates in Telecom Towers, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
67Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 52nd percentile of the scored universe and 57th percentile within Infra. Main check: results consistency is weak at 45/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
2 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
52nd percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 57th pctile, median 64 · Small: 56th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

2 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
66
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
66
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
45
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 36.5%.
  • ▸12 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter holding is only 3.3%.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 1.2x.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 30%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

4 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Intimation Under Regulation 30 Of The SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 15 Sep - 23rd AGM on September 30, 2026; annual report FY2025-26 web-link shared with shareholders.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 9 Sep - We submit copy of public notice published in the newspapers in respect of convening of the 23rd Annual General Meeting of the Company and information …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.