Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 1 Oct - GPT subsidiary won five-year Transnet Freight Rail sleeper contract worth ZAR 660 million, about ₹385 crore plus VAT.
Source: Bse
GPT Infraprojects Limited (GPTINFRA)
Small CapInfra stocks · Small cap · NSE
GPT Infraprojects Limited operates in Infrastructure, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Aug, 09:15 pm IST
Score22 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
51NeutralSMA20 +6.6% / mo · MACD − · sector -2.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Stock trend: 60
Sector RS: 38
Sector 3M: -7.9% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Infra FPI tailwindNot confirmed
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Technical chart
GPTINFRAD candles · FIT view+1.5%Latest close ₹116.65 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-4.3%
RSI
46
MACD hist
-0.34
52W pos
38%
2026-10-21O ₹121.90H ₹121.90L ₹115.40C ₹116.65Vol 2.0L sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
GPTINFRANifty InfraNifty 500
- GPTINFRA
- -2.0%
- Nifty 500
- -6.5%
- Nifty Infra
- -8.6%
- Vs Nifty 500
- +4.5 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -22.2%
- 52W range position
- 38%
- ATR (14)
- 5.0%
- Volume vs 20D
- 0.56x
- Avg traded value
- ₹4.4 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹112.5 - ₹135
₹150
₹96.2 - ₹150
₹5.8
Latest completed session
20-session average
45.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.
Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE59
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Bad0
Revenue -3.5% · PAT -4.0% YoY
Technical
Neutral51
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model+35.2%
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence68
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -4% YoY · PAT -4% YoY · margin expansion
Filed 01 Aug 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹302 Cr | -3.5% | -27.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹48 Cr | +29.7% | -18.6% |
| Operating margin | 16.0% | +400 bps | +200 bps |
| PAT | ₹24 Cr | -4.0% | -20.0% |
| PAT margin | 8.0% | -4 bps | +72 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 15.40
- P/B
- 2.52
- EV/EBITDA
- 8.48
- Market Cap
- 1521.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 17.30%
- ROCE
- 21.40%
- ROA
- 7.08%
- Dividend Y
- 2.28%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 16.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 37.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 17.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 46.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.49
- Interest Coverage
- 5.14×
- Altman Z
- 3.26
- Book Value
- 47.70
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 10/5
- OCF
- 64.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 7.79
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 69.37%
- Promoter Pledge
- 50.80%
- Momentum 52W
- 44%
Financial History
Updated 22/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 1,290+8.6% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: 97.0+31.1% vs prev
Return on Equity
%Latest: 16.1+13.9% vs prev
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 46. Wait for confirmation.
- Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
- SMA20 rising (~6.2% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
- RSI(14) at 46 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 22% off 52W high · 21% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
70
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-1.5%
3M return
-2.0%
6M return
-0.1%
1Y return
+7.2%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
+13
Sector rank
#17
Industry rank
#68
Stage evidence
- Price is within 0.1% of the 30-week proxy.
- The 30-week proxy changed +0.8% over 20 sessions.
- The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 106.3-2.92%
RS vs Nifty 500106
Valuation & peers
U-Score 59 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 59 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Financial Turnaround
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · FAIR VALUEValuation10/30
Growth23/25
Quality11/20
Balance Sheet6/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
59
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
59/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 35.2%.
- Growth contributes 23/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Promoter pledge is 50.8%.
- Valuation is weaker at 10/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 6/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
15.4
PB
2.5
EV/EBITDA
8.5
ROE
17.3%
ROCE
21.4%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
+35.2%
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
59
Previous: 59
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+35.2%
Previous: +35.2%
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
22 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
Factor attribution
No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
₹91.44
-27.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
23.1
Growth-justified Value
₹179.95
+35.2% MoS
PEG
0.38
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
GAYAPROJ
Small
Gayatri Projects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 98
47
8.0
—
+94%
FAIR VALUE
ABINFRA
Small
A B Infrabuild Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 95
38
40.4
13.8%
-92%
WATCHLIST
GLOBECIVIL
Small
Globe Civil Projects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 93
62
9.7
13.7%
+61%
UNDERVALUED
IL&FSENGG
Small
IL&FS Engineering and Construction Company Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 92
20
39.4
—
-103%
OVERVALUED
HECPROJECT
Small
HEC Infra Projects Limited
Construction & Engineering
match 92
69
9.5
21.2%
+59%
UNDERVALUED
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
GPT Infraprojects Limited operates in Infrastructure, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
68Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 61st percentile within Infra. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 43/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
111 docs text-extracted · 51 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
56th percentile
overall median 67 · Infra: 61st pctile, median 64 · Small: 60th pctile, median 66
Evidence depth
Financial-only
111 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
43
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
82
strong · capital discipline
Results
55
watch · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 69.4%.
- ▸10 years of positive FCF.
- ▸ROCE is 21.4%.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoters have pledged 50.8% of holding.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching GPT Infraprojects Limited
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 1 Oct - WOS won Western Railway signalling contract worth ₹21.21 crore, executable in 18 months.
Source: Bse
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 17 Sep - GPTINFRA won ₹483.72 crore railway bridge contract from RVNL.
Source: Bse
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 12 Sep - WOS Alcon Builders won ₹85.53 crore railway signalling contract from Eastern Railway, to execute in 12 months.
Source: Bse
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Award_of_Order_Receipt_of_Order 9 Sep - WOS Alcon Builders wins ₹114.82 crore signalling works contract from Northeast Frontier Railway for 10 stations.
Source: Bse
Annual report
Annual Report 2026
Source: Bse
Annual report
Annual Report 2025
Source: Bse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.