GPT Infraprojects Limited (GPTINFRA)
Small CapInfra stocks · Small cap · NSE
GPT Infraprojects Limited operates in Infrastructure, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -4% YoY · PAT -4% YoY · margin expansion
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹302 Cr | -3.5% | -27.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹48 Cr | +29.7% | -18.6% |
| Operating margin | 16.0% | +400 bps | +200 bps |
| PAT | ₹24 Cr | -4.0% | -20.0% |
| PAT margin | 8.0% | -4 bps | +72 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
GPT Infraprojects Limited operates in Infrastructure, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
43NeutralSMA20 -3.9% / mo · MACD − · sector +2.3pp vs Nifty (3M)
Technical chart
GPTINFRAdaily · 1Y · AUTO-4.1%Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 45. Wait for confirmation.
- Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
- SMA20 falling (~4.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 45 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 25% off 52W high · 17% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 63 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 63 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
UNDERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 43.2%.
- Growth contributes 23/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Promoter pledge is 50.8%.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 6/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 61st percentile within Infra. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 43/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 69.4%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 50.8% of holding.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · Infra: 61st pctile, median 64 · Small: 60th pctile, median 66
111 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 69.4%.
- ▸10 years of positive FCF.
- ▸ROCE is 21.4%.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoters have pledged 50.8% of holding.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 14.40
- P/B
- 2.35
- EV/EBITDA
- 8.00
- Market Cap
- 1417.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 17.30%
- ROCE
- 21.40%
- ROA
- 7.08%
- Dividend Y
- 2.45%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 16.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 37.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 17.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 46.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.49
- Interest Coverage
- 5.14×
- Altman Z
- 3.18
- Book Value
- 47.70
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 10/5
- OCF
- 64.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 7.79
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 69.37%
- Promoter Pledge
- 50.80%
- Momentum 52W
- 30%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in Infra, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in Infra, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.