Globesecure Technologies Ltd. (GSTL)
SME CapIT stocks · SME cap · NSE
Globesecure Technologies Ltd. operates in Cybersecurity, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Weak fundamentals, management trust is a red flag, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -7% YoY · PAT -23% YoY · margin expansion · +63% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹12.8 Cr | -7.3% | +62.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹1.4 Cr | +152.9% | +1460.0% |
| Operating margin | 10.6% | +5089 bps | +1188 bps |
| PAT | ₹0.6 Cr | -22.5% | NDF |
| PAT margin | 4.8% | +5359 bps | +1613 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Globesecure Technologies Ltd. operates in Cybersecurity, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
34Bearishfull bear SMA stack · SMA20 -15.4% / mo · MACD −
Technical chart
GSTLdaily · 1Y · AUTO-57.7%Daily technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 32.
- Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
- Recent death cross (SMA50 crossed below SMA200).
- SMA20 falling (~18.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 32 — sideways, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
- 68% off 52W high · 102% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 12 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 12 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
OVERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 10.1%.
- Cash flow contributes 7/10 to the score.
- Growth contributes 5/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 1.7, in distress territory.
- Promoter pledge is 81.3%.
- Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Weak Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 1st percentile of the scored universe and 2nd percentile within IT. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.
Low Trust Lite: Promoter holding increased 4.3%. Key concern: Promoters have pledged 81.3% of holding.
Management or financial behaviour needs caution. Demand stronger valuation compensation.
overall median 67 · IT: 2nd pctile, median 69 · SME: 1st pctile, median 64
0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Weak Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding increased 4.3%.
- ▸FCF yield is 10.1%.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoters have pledged 81.3% of holding.
- ▸Altman Z is 1.66.
- ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Interest coverage is 1.3x.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- —
- P/B
- 0.49
- EV/EBITDA
- 15.15
- Market Cap
- 22.20Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- -0.62%
- ROCE
- 1.18%
- ROA
- -0.39%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 2.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 10.25%
- Revenue 3Y
- -7.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -50.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.15
- Interest Coverage
- 1.34×
- Altman Z
- 1.66
- Book Value
- 28.40
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 10.14%
- FCF Positive Y
- 3/5
- OCF
- 2.38 Cr
- EPS TTM
- -0.18
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 27.83%
- Promoter Pledge
- 81.30%
- Momentum 52W
- 25%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in IT — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.