Annual reportSep 2026
Sep 2026 · Shareholders meeting 7 Sep - 9th AGM on 29 Sep 2026; annual report and related party transaction approvals sought.
Source: Nse
Tridhya Tech Ltd. (TRIDHYA)
SME CapIT stocks · SME cap · NSE
Tridhya Tech Ltd. operates in Software Services, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
₹6.45
-0.30 · -4.44%
Market cap ₹15.8 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 07:59 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · IT P/E 21.4 (n=204)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
54Neutralfull bear SMA stack · SMA20 -28.0% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector +14.5pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Stock trend: 24
Sector RS: 100
Sector 3M: +8.9% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
IT FPI tailwindNot confirmed
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Technical chart
TRIDHYAD candles · FIT view-38.0%Latest close ₹6.45 on 2026-10-14
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
33
MACD hist
0.03
52W pos
1%
2026-10-14O ₹6.45H ₹6.45L ₹6.45C ₹6.45Vol 3,000 sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
TRIDHYANifty ITNifty 500
- TRIDHYA
- -38.6%
- Nifty 500
- -5.0%
- Nifty IT
- +5.1%
- Vs Nifty 500
- -33.6 pp
Chart stats
14 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -70.9%
- 52W range position
- 1%
- ATR (14)
- 5.2%
- Volume vs 20D
- 0.43x
- Avg traded value
- ₹0 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹6.5 - ₹8.3
₹22.2
₹6.3 - ₹22.2
₹0.3
Latest completed session
20-session average
57.7% annualized volatility
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.
Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED14
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Bad0
Revenue -20.4% · PAT -60.5% YoY
Technical
Neutral54
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model-127.2%
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence53
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -20% YoY · PAT -60% YoY · margin expansion · +5% QoQ
Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹14.2 Cr | -20.4% | +5.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹3.6 Cr | NDF | +855.3% |
| Operating margin | 25.0% | NDF | +2852 bps |
| PAT | ₹2.6 Cr | -60.5% | NDF |
| PAT margin | 18.6% | NDF | +3463 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 12.10
- P/B
- 0.36
- EV/EBITDA
- 12.67
- Market Cap
- 15.80Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 3.03%
- ROCE
- 6.15%
- ROA
- 0.39%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 3.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 3.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 9.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -26.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 1.75
- Interest Coverage
- 0.54×
- Altman Z
- 0.78
- Book Value
- 18.70
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 200.76%
- FCF Positive Y
- 1/5
- OCF
- 24.85 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 0.29
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 61.74%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 4%
Financial History
Updated 21/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 14.2+5.1% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: 2.6+222.2% vs prev
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 33.
- SMA20 falling (~39.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 33 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
- Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
3
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-20.4%
3M return
-43.7%
6M return
-54.7%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-6
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
#39
Stage evidence
- Price is 41.4% below the 30-week proxy.
- The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -10.0%.
- Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
improving
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
155 observations
14 Oct 2026Value 39.5-5.37%
RS vs Nifty 50040
Valuation & peers
U-Score 14 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 14 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Distress Watch
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · OVERVALUEDValuation9/30
Growth4/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
14
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
14/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 200.8%.
- Cash flow contributes 5/10 to the score.
- Valuation contributes 9/30 to the score.
Main drags
- Altman Z is 0.8, in distress territory.
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
- Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -127.2%.
Sector valuation model
IT valuation: PE and EV/EBITDA against growth and margins
Asset-light IT companies deserve valuation support only when growth, margins, and cash conversion hold up.
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA relative to revenue growth, margins, and cash conversion.
Secondary checks
Deal pipeline, attrition, dollar revenue growth, FCF yield.
Main risk check
Low PE can reflect weak growth or margin pressure.
PE
12.1
PB
0.4
EV/EBITDA
12.7
ROE
3.0%
ROCE
6.2%
FCF Yield
200.8%
Debt/Equity
1.8
MoS
-127.2%
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
14
Previous: 14
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-127.2%
Previous: -127.2%
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
Factor attribution
No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
₹11.05
+41.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
9.8
Growth-justified Value
₹2.84
-127.2% MoS
PEG
4.03
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in IT — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
QUICKTOUCH
SME
Quicktouch Technologies Ltd.
IT Services / Digital
match 157
3
—
-5.3%
—
OVERVALUED
MICROPRO
SME
Micropro Software Solutions Ltd.
IT Services / Digital
match 154
14
—
-2.9%
—
OVERVALUED
ACEINTEG
Small
Ace Integrated Solutions Limited
IT Services / Digital
match 153
12
—
-8.6%
—
OVERVALUED
PLADAINFO
SME
Plada Infotech Services Ltd.
IT Services / Digital
match 152
61
5.8
7.3%
+82%
UNDERVALUED
ORTINGLOBE
Small
ORTIN GLOBAL LIMITED
IT Services / Digital
match 150
1
—
-48.4%
—
OVERVALUED
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
Tridhya Tech Ltd. operates in Software Services, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
53Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 12th percentile of the scored universe and 12th percentile within IT. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 21/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
12th percentile
overall median 67 · IT: 12th pctile, median 69 · SME: 13th pctile, median 64
Evidence depth
Financial-only
0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
21
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
31
weak · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 61.7%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is 188.8%.
Trust risks
- ▸Altman Z is 0.77.
- ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Debt/equity is 1.75.
- ▸Interest coverage is 0.5x.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching Tridhya Tech Ltd.
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026
Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026
Source: Nse
Annual reportMar 2025
Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025
Source: Nse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.