Skip to content

Orient Green Power Company Limited (GREENPOWER)

Small Cap

Power stocks · Small cap · NSE

Orient Green Power Company Limited operates in Renewable Power, within the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹8.05
-0.25 · -3.01%
Market cap ₹1,016 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result22 Jul, 11:18 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Power P/E 16.8 (n=92)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

22Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -6.4% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: —
Power FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GREENPOWERD candles · FIT view-28.2%
Latest close ₹8.05 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-3.0%
RSI
26
MACD hist
-0.03
52W pos
1%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹8.30H ₹8.32L ₹8.00C ₹8.05Vol 19.8L sh
₹7.73₹9.23₹10.72₹12.22₹13.7252L₹8.052026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GREENPOWERNifty PowerNifty 500
-26%-16%-6%+4%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026GREENPOWER -23.4%Nifty Power -14.5%Nifty 500 -6.5%
GREENPOWER
-23.4%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Power
-14.5%
Vs Nifty 500
-16.9 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-46.1%
₹14.9
52W range position
1%
₹8 - ₹14.9
ATR (14)
4.1%
₹0.3
Volume vs 20D
1.16x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹1.5 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹8 - ₹9.7
23.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
56

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -6.9% · PAT -17.2% YoY

Technical
Bearish
22

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+41.7%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
56

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -7% YoY · PAT -17% YoY · margin compression · +108% QoQ

Filed 22 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹81 Cr-6.9%+107.7%
EBITDA₹55 Cr-8.3%+450.0%
Operating margin68.0%-100 bps+4200 bps
PAT₹24 Cr-17.2%NDF
PAT margin29.6%-370 bps+7322 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
19.00
P/B
0.88
EV/EBITDA
5.79
Market Cap
1016.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.27%
ROCE
7.19%
ROA
3.87%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
3.00%
EPS 5Y
24.00%
Revenue 3Y
4.00%
EPS 3Y
85.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.45
Interest Coverage
3.24×
Altman Z
1.78
Book Value
9.82

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
9.84%
FCF Positive Y
12/5
OCF
195.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.55

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
24.38%
Promoter Pledge
100.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 81.0+107.7% vs prev
0131.0Sep 2023: 122Dec 2023: 34.0Mar 2024: 36.0Jun 2024: 63.0Sep 2024: 121Dec 2024: 35.0Mar 2025: 42.0Jun 2025: 87.0Sep 2025: 131Dec 2025: 36.0Mar 2026: 39.0Jun 2026: 81.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 24.0+241.2% vs prev
-25.0081.0Sep 2023: 75.0Dec 2023: -21.0Mar 2024: -25.0Jun 2024: 6.0Sep 2024: 66.0Dec 2024: -22.0Mar 2025: -15.0Jun 2025: 29.0Sep 2025: 81.0Dec 2025: -21.0Mar 2026: -17.0Jun 2026: 24.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 26.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~6.9% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 26 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

13
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-11.0%
3M return
-23.4%
6M return
-26.8%
1Y return
-41.8%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-9
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
#75
Stage evidence
  • Price is 20.4% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 63.99-2.10%
62738495107Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2664
RS vs Nifty 50064

Valuation & peers

U-Score 56 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

56U-SCORE
Growth at Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation21/30
Growth19/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
56

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

56/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 9.8%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 41.7%.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.8, in distress territory.
  • Promoter pledge is 100.0%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
19.0
PB
0.9
EV/EBITDA
5.8
ROE
5.3%
ROCE
7.2%
FCF Yield
9.8%
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
+41.7%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
56
Previous: 53 (+3)
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+41.7%
Previous: +40.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -3 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
56
53

Factor attribution

Valuation
21+3
was 18

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹11.02
+27.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
25.1
Growth-justified Value
₹13.82
+41.7% MoS
PEG
0.49

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Power — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
INDOWIND
Small
Indowind Energy Limited
Renewable Energy
match 161
23
—
0.1%
-3673%
OVERVALUED
CLEANMAX
Small
Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions Limited
Renewable Energy
match 151
19
97.7
1.8%
-250%
OVERVALUED
ADANIGREEN
Large
Adani Green Energy Limited
Renewable Energy
match 145
21
110.6
11.4%
-340%
OVERVALUED
URJA
Small
Urja Global Limited
Renewable Energy
match 136
13
352.0
0.8%
-5274%
OVERVALUED
ENERGYDEV
Small
Energy Development Company Limited
Renewable Energy
match 134
39
285.0
33.2%
-1034%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Orient Green Power Company Limited operates in Renewable Power, within the Power sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
56Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 18th percentile of the scored universe and 21st percentile within Power. Main check: promoter alignment is weak at 23/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
72 docs text-extracted · 31 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
18th percentile

overall median 67 · Power: 21st pctile, median 65 · Small: 20th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

72 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
23
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
45
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸FCF yield is 9.2%.
  • ▸12 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoters have pledged 100% of holding.
  • ▸Promoter holding is only 24.4%.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 7.2%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 5.3%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 16 Sep - CRISIL upgraded Beta Wind Farm’s Rs617.79 crore debt rating to BBB/Stable from BBB-/Positive.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 9 Sep - ICRA assigned BBB (Stable) ratings to BETA’s ₹510 crore and DELTA’s ₹85 crore debt facilities.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 23 Jul - Newspaper Advertisement -Disclosure under Regulation 30 and Regulation 47 of SEBI ( LODR) Regulations, 2015 ( "SEBI Listing Regulations")

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.