Aug 2026 · Transcript
Source: Company Ir
Services stocks · Micro cap · NSE
Gujarat Pipavav Port Limited (GPPL) operates a port in Gujarat, India, providing services for container, bulk, liquid, and RORO cargo. It is part of APM Terminals, offering integrated port and logistics solutions.
SMA20 +1.8% / mo · MACD −
FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but exact sector-index confirmation is unavailable. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
No exact NSE sector index is mapped for this company. Nifty 500 remains the broad-market comparison.
Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +32.8% · PAT +42.3% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +33% YoY · PAT +42% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹332 Cr | +32.8% | +4.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹214 Cr | +45.6% | -4.0% |
| Operating margin | 64.0% | +500 bps | -600 bps |
| PAT | ₹148 Cr | +42.3% | +4.2% |
| PAT margin | 44.6% | +298 bps | -21 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 19/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 50. Wait for confirmation.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 71 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
GPPL reported robust financial growth for FY26, with revenue up 17%, EBITDA up 23%, and Net Profit up 26%. Q4 FY26 also saw significant YoY financial improvement, despite mixed cargo volume trends.
The company delivered strong financial performance for FY26, driven by higher Dry Bulk and RORO revenue. Q4 FY26 also showed strong YoY financial growth. However, container and liquid volumes were impacted by the Middle East conflict, and Q4 bulk volumes declined QoQ. The overall margin expansion is positive.
Higher exports by OEM drove significant RORO volume growth in Q4 and FY26 (+39% YoY for both periods).
Higher fertilizer volumes contributed to overall dry bulk growth in FY26 (+35% YoY).
Higher LPG imports supported liquid cargo growth in FY26 (+8% YoY).
Strong demand from OEMs led to higher RORO exports, driving a 39% YoY increase in RORO units for Q4 and FY26.
Increased fertilizer imports boosted dry bulk volumes for the full year FY26.
Higher LPG imports contributed to liquid cargo growth for the full year FY26.
The Middle East conflict impacted container and liquid volumes in Q4 and FY26.
Lower mineral imports contributed to a 4% YoY decline in bulk volumes for Q4 FY26.
Economic conditions affecting demand/supply and price conditions in the markets in which the company operates.
Changes in Government regulations, tax laws, and other statutes could impact operations.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
The document provides both Q4 vs Q4 (YoY) and FY vs FY (YoY) comparisons, which are crucial for assessing annual performance and seasonal trends. It also includes QoQ data for volumes, which helps track sequential momentum and immediate operational shifts.
Q4 FY26: 165,218 (-4% YoY); FY26: 668,166 (-4% YoY)
Q4 FY26: 451,352 (-4% YoY); FY26: 2,974,540 (+35% YoY)
Q4 FY26: 383,265 (-5% YoY); FY26: 1,591,614 (+8% YoY)
Q4 FY26: 67,609 (+39% YoY); FY26: 229,326 (+39% YoY)
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Container Volumes | Q4 FY26 at 165,218 TEUs (-4% YoY) | Recovery from Middle East conflict impact and sequential growth in container throughput. |
| RORO Volumes | Q4 FY26 at 67,609 units (+39% YoY) | Sustained OEM export demand and continued strong growth in RORO throughput. |
| EBITDA Margin | FY26 at 59% (+100 bps YoY) | Continued margin expansion and effective cost control measures. |
| Bulk Cargo Mix | Q4 FY26 bulk volumes impacted by lower mineral imports. | Diversification and stability in bulk cargo types to mitigate commodity-specific volatility. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 99th percentile of the scored universe and 100th percentile within Services. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Services: 100th pctile, median 66 · Micro: 99th pctile, median 73
86 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Company Ir
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Company Ir
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Company Ir
Source: Bse
Source: Company Ir