Skip to content

Gujarat Pipavav Port Limited (GPPL)

Micro Cap

Services stocks · Micro cap · NSE

Gujarat Pipavav Port Limited (GPPL) operates a port in Gujarat, India, providing services for container, bulk, liquid, and RORO cargo. It is part of APM Terminals, offering integrated port and logistics solutions.

₹166.08
-0.21 · -0.13%
Market cap ₹8,036 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals17 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 12:31 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Services P/E 17.7 (n=143)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

55Neutral

SMA20 +1.8% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 55
Sector RS: —

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but exact sector-index confirmation is unavailable. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GPPLD candles · FIT view+7.5%
Latest close ₹166.08 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.6%
RSI
50
MACD hist
-0.27
52W pos
42%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹167.00H ₹168.60L ₹165.40C ₹166.08Vol 5.2L sh
₹145.00₹153.82₹162.63₹171.45₹180.27₹166.082026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GPPLNifty 500
-10%-0%+9%+18%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026GPPL +9.6%Nifty 500 -5.6%
GPPL
+9.6%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Vs Nifty 500
+15.2 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-17.0%
₹200.1
52W range position
42%
₹141.6 - ₹200.1
ATR (14)
3.1%
₹5.2
Volume vs 20D
0.37x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹22.3 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹157.7 - ₹178.7
32.9% annualized volatility

No exact NSE sector index is mapped for this company. Nifty 500 remains the broad-market comparison.

Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
71

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
90

Revenue +32.8% · PAT +42.3% YoY

Technical
Neutral
55

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+45.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
87

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 90/100

Rev +33% YoY · PAT +42% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹332 Cr+32.8%+4.7%
EBITDA₹214 Cr+45.6%-4.0%
Operating margin64.0%+500 bps-600 bps
PAT₹148 Cr+42.3%+4.2%
PAT margin44.6%+298 bps-21 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
14.80
P/B
3.36
EV/EBITDA
8.96
Market Cap
8036.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
20.80%
ROCE
28.10%
ROA
18.49%
Dividend Y
6.25%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
10.00%
EPS 5Y
17.00%
Revenue 3Y
8.00%
EPS 3Y
13.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
129.17×
Altman Z
8.39
Book Value
49.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
6.12%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
510.00 Cr
EPS TTM
11.55

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
44.01%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
41%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 332+4.7% vs prev
0332.0Sep 2023: 253Dec 2023: 270Mar 2024: 251Jun 2024: 246Sep 2024: 227Dec 2024: 263Mar 2025: 252Jun 2025: 250Sep 2025: 299Dec 2025: 292Mar 2026: 317Jun 2026: 332Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 148+4.2% vs prev
0161.0Sep 2023: 92.0Dec 2023: 116Mar 2024: 66.0Jun 2024: 110Sep 2024: 75.0Dec 2024: 99.0Mar 2025: 112Jun 2025: 104Sep 2025: 161Dec 2025: 108Mar 2026: 142Jun 2026: 148Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 50. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • Recent golden cross (SMA50 crossed above SMA200).
  • SMA20 rising (~1.8% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 50 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 17% off 52W high · 17% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

70
RS percentile
Stage 3 Topping
1M return
+3.6%
3M return
+9.6%
6M return
+5.1%
1Y return
+4.5%
RS 1D
+3
RS 20D
+14
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
#40
Stage evidence
  • 14.2% below the 52-week closing high after prior strength.
  • The 30-week proxy has stalled (+0.2% over 20 sessions).
  • Price has not yet confirmed a full Stage 4 downtrend.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 109.52+0.90%
9097105113120Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26110
RS vs Nifty 500110

Valuation & peers

U-Score 71 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

71U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation13/30
Growth17/25
Quality16/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
71

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

71/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 6.1%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 45.8%.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 13/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 17/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 11/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
14.8
PB
3.4
EV/EBITDA
9.0
ROE
20.8%
ROCE
28.1%
FCF Yield
6.1%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+45.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
71
Previous: 71
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+45.8%
Previous: +45.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
71
71
71
71
69
69
69
69
71
71
71
71

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹113.3
-46.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
26.6
Growth-justified Value
₹306.65
+45.8% MoS
PEG
0.96

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
NUCLEUS
Small
Nucleus Software Exports Limited
Logistics
match 73
36
14.7
13.1%
-86%
WATCHLIST
TOTAL
Small
Total Transport Systems Limited
Logistics
match 73
53
12.4
8.4%
+53%
FAIR VALUE
TVSSCS
Micro
TVS Supply Chain Solutions Limited
Logistics
match 56
32
78.6
9.7%
-213%
WATCHLIST
BLACKBUCK
Micro
BLACKBUCK LIMITED
Logistics
match 55
32
63.2
12.2%
-136%
WATCHLIST
TCI
Small
Transport Corporation of India Limited
Logistics
match 54
65
14.8
19.2%
+46%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T07:41:40.040Z
Management commentary snapshot

GPPL reported robust financial growth for FY26, with revenue up 17%, EBITDA up 23%, and Net Profit up 26%. Q4 FY26 also saw significant YoY financial improvement, despite mixed cargo volume trends.

The company delivered strong financial performance for FY26, driven by higher Dry Bulk and RORO revenue. Q4 FY26 also showed strong YoY financial growth. However, container and liquid volumes were impacted by the Middle East conflict, and Q4 bulk volumes declined QoQ. The overall margin expansion is positive.

Growth engines

RORO Exports

Higher exports by OEM drove significant RORO volume growth in Q4 and FY26 (+39% YoY for both periods).

Dry Bulk (Fertilizer)

Higher fertilizer volumes contributed to overall dry bulk growth in FY26 (+35% YoY).

Liquid (LPG Imports)

Higher LPG imports supported liquid cargo growth in FY26 (+8% YoY).

Tailwinds

OEM Export Demand

Strong demand from OEMs led to higher RORO exports, driving a 39% YoY increase in RORO units for Q4 and FY26.

Fertilizer Import Growth

Increased fertilizer imports boosted dry bulk volumes for the full year FY26.

LPG Import Growth

Higher LPG imports contributed to liquid cargo growth for the full year FY26.

Headwinds

Middle East Conflict

The Middle East conflict impacted container and liquid volumes in Q4 and FY26.

Lower Mineral Imports

Lower mineral imports contributed to a 4% YoY decline in bulk volumes for Q4 FY26.

Risk radar

Economic Conditions

Economic conditions affecting demand/supply and price conditions in the markets in which the company operates.

Regulatory Changes

Changes in Government regulations, tax laws, and other statutes could impact operations.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

The document provides both Q4 vs Q4 (YoY) and FY vs FY (YoY) comparisons, which are crucial for assessing annual performance and seasonal trends. It also includes QoQ data for volumes, which helps track sequential momentum and immediate operational shifts.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Container Throughput (TEUs)

Q4 FY26: 165,218 (-4% YoY); FY26: 668,166 (-4% YoY)

Dry Bulk Throughput (MT)

Q4 FY26: 451,352 (-4% YoY); FY26: 2,974,540 (+35% YoY)

Liquid Throughput (MT)

Q4 FY26: 383,265 (-5% YoY); FY26: 1,591,614 (+8% YoY)

RORO Throughput (Units)

Q4 FY26: 67,609 (+39% YoY); FY26: 229,326 (+39% YoY)

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Container VolumesQ4 FY26 at 165,218 TEUs (-4% YoY)Recovery from Middle East conflict impact and sequential growth in container throughput.
RORO VolumesQ4 FY26 at 67,609 units (+39% YoY)Sustained OEM export demand and continued strong growth in RORO throughput.
EBITDA MarginFY26 at 59% (+100 bps YoY)Continued margin expansion and effective cost control measures.
Bulk Cargo MixQ4 FY26 bulk volumes impacted by lower mineral imports.Diversification and stability in bulk cargo types to mitigate commodity-specific volatility.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
87Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 99th percentile of the scored universe and 100th percentile within Services. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
86 docs text-extracted · 8 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
99th percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 100th pctile, median 66 · Micro: 99th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

86 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
90
strong · capital discipline
Results
77
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 6.3%.
  • ▸11 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.02.

Trust risks

  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 17%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

12 shown
Concall transcriptAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Transcript

Source: Company Ir

Open source ↗
Investor presentationAug 2026

Aug 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement Of A Material Update 26 Aug - GMB issued comfort letter to process Pipavav Port concession extension proposal; documents due within 90 days.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationMay 2026

May 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptMay 2026

May 2026 · Transcript

Source: Company Ir

Open source ↗
Investor presentationMay 2026

May 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationFeb 2026

Feb 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptFeb 2026

Feb 2026 · Transcript

Source: Company Ir

Open source ↗
Investor presentationFeb 2026

Feb 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Concall transcriptNov 2025

Nov 2025 · Transcript

Source: Company Ir

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.