Skip to content

GMM Pfaudler Limited (GMMPFAUDLR)

Micro Cap

Industrials stocks · Micro cap · NSE

GMM Pfaudler Limited manufactures process equipment, providing glass-lined and non-glass-lined technologies, systems, and services globally. It serves diverse sectors including pharmaceuticals, chemicals, oil & gas, and defense.

₹1,288.6
-23.50 · -1.79%
Market cap ₹5,941 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals14 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result05 Aug, 10:43 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

57Neutral

SMA20 +19.8% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 61
Sector RS: 50
Sector 3M: -6.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

GMMPFAUDLRD candles · FIT view+41.8%
Latest close ₹1288.60 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-1.3%
RSI
45
MACD hist
-27.79
52W pos
69%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹1306.00H ₹1323.00L ₹1281.10C ₹1288.60Vol 98,810 sh
₹695.07₹914.69₹1.13k₹1.35k₹1.57k52H52L₹1288.602026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

GMMPFAUDLRNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-17%+21%+59%+97%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026GMMPFAUDLR +60.6%Nifty India Manufactu… -5.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
GMMPFAUDLR
+60.6%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-5.8%
Vs Nifty 500
+66.1 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-16.0%
₹1,533.6
52W range position
69%
₹735 - ₹1,533.6
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹64
Volume vs 20D
0.31x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹37.3 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹1,266.1 - ₹1,533.6
44.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
21

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Good
67

Revenue +16.4% · PAT +120.0% YoY

Technical
Neutral
57

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-1364.2%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
67

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 67/100

Rev +16% YoY · PAT +120% YoY · operating leverage · margin compression

Filed 05 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹925 Cr+16.4%-2.0%
EBITDA₹94 Cr-6.9%+25.3%
Operating margin10.0%-300 bps+200 bps
PAT₹22 Cr+120.0%+46.7%
PAT margin2.4%+112 bps+79 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
47.20
P/B
4.93
EV/EBITDA
12.58
Market Cap
5941.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
6.69%
ROCE
13.60%
ROA
1.63%
Dividend Y
0.15%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
29.00%
EPS 5Y
-4.00%
Revenue 3Y
4.00%
EPS 3Y
-23.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.86
Interest Coverage
3.83×
Altman Z
3.05
Book Value
268.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.96%
FCF Positive Y
10/5
OCF
389.00 Cr
EPS TTM
16.06

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
25.18%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
73%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 925-2.0% vs prev
0944.0Sep 2023: 937Dec 2023: 856Mar 2024: 741Jun 2024: 785Sep 2024: 805Dec 2024: 801Mar 2025: 807Jun 2025: 795Sep 2025: 902Dec 2025: 884Mar 2026: 944Jun 2026: 925Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 22.0+46.7% vs prev
-28.0067.0Sep 2023: 67.0Dec 2023: 28.0Mar 2024: 25.0Jun 2024: 22.0Sep 2024: 15.0Dec 2024: 40.0Mar 2025: -28.0Jun 2025: 10.0Sep 2025: 39.0Dec 2025: -11.0Mar 2026: 15.0Jun 2026: 22.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 45. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 rising (~16.5% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 45 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 16% off 52W high · 75% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

84
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendEstablished S2
1M return
-12.2%
3M return
+60.6%
6M return
+40.6%
1Y return
+6.3%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-6
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
#19
Stage evidence
  • Price is 33.1% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +7.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
04 Sept 2026
S2 age
30 trading sessions
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 126.82-0.77%
6687108128149Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26127
RS vs Nifty 500127

Valuation & peers

U-Score 21 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

21U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth7/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow6/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
21

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

21/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 4.0%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Cash flow contributes 6/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -1364.2%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
47.2
PB
4.9
EV/EBITDA
12.6
ROE
6.7%
ROCE
13.6%
FCF Yield
4.0%
Debt/Equity
0.9
MoS
-1364.2%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
21
Previous: 21
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-1364.2%
Previous: -1364.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹311.19
-314.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
5.5
Growth-justified Value
₹88.01
-1364.2% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
ANUP
Micro
The Anup Engineering Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 83
50
35.3
17.1%
+10%
FAIR VALUE
ISGEC
Small
Isgec Heavy Engineering Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 82
27
25.3
4.2%
-982%
OVERVALUED
COCKERILL
Small
John Cockerill India Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 80
18
183.0
8.9%
-6211%
OVERVALUED
TAURIAN
SME
Taurian MPS Ltd.
Industrial Machinery
match 72
56
33.9
26.7%
+14%
FAIR VALUE
GREAVESCOT
Micro
Greaves Cotton Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 59
31
47.8
8.1%
-19%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-03T07:40:02.328Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 Consolidated Revenue up 10% YoY to ₹3,524 Cr, EBITDA up 11% to ₹403 Cr (11.4% margin). Order Intake surged 20% YoY to ₹3,714 Cr, with Backlog up 34% YoY to ₹2,194 Cr. Q4 FY26 Revenue grew 17% YoY, but EBITDA declined 10% YoY.

Strong order intake and backlog growth for FY26 indicate robust demand and future revenue visibility. However, Q4 FY26 saw a notable decline in consolidated EBITDA margin and absolute EBITDA, raising questions about execution efficiency and cost management in the short term. Adjusted PAT shows better underlying profitability.

Current business mix

Order Intake by Segment (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Traditional40.0%
Pharmaceuticals27.0%
Chemicals33.0%
Growth engines

Strong Order Intake

Consolidated Order Intake grew 20% YoY in FY26 to ₹3,714 Cr, indicating robust demand across segments.

Growing Backlog

Backlog increased 34% YoY to ₹2,194 Cr, providing significant revenue visibility for future periods.

Diversification Strategy

Diversification strategy gaining momentum, with Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals contributing significantly to order intake.

Tailwinds

Improved Net Debt Ratios

Net Debt/Equity improved to 0.1x and Net Debt/Adj. EBITDA to 0.4x, indicating stronger financial health.

Increased Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow generation for FY26 was ₹367 crores, up from ₹318 crores in FY25.

Headwinds

Q4 EBITDA Decline

Consolidated EBITDA declined 10% YoY in Q4 FY26, with margin contracting by 236 bps YoY and 392 bps QoQ.

Exceptional Items Impact

FY26 PAT includes exceptional items of ₹47 Cr (net of tax) related to Labour Code provision and Waghäusel severance costs.

Working Capital Stretch

Receivable days increased to 48 and Payable days to 49, indicating potential pressure on working capital management.

Risk radar

Execution & Margin Pressure

The significant QoQ and YoY decline in Q4 consolidated EBITDA margin suggests potential execution or cost control challenges that need monitoring.

Working Capital Management

Increase in receivable and payable days could indicate a less efficient working capital cycle, potentially impacting cash flow.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

FY26 results provide annual performance and strategic direction, while Q4 FY26 data offers recent operational momentum and margin trends, crucial for assessing sequential execution and any immediate challenges.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Order Intake

Consolidated Order Intake for FY26 was ₹3,714 Cr, up 20% YoY. Q4 FY26 Order Intake was ₹871 Cr, up 32% YoY.

Backlog

Consolidated Backlog as of March 31, 2026, was ₹2,194 Cr, up 34% YoY.

Revenue

Consolidated Revenue for FY26 was ₹3,524 Cr, up 10% YoY. Q4 FY26 Revenue was ₹944 Cr, up 17% YoY.

EBITDA Margin

Consolidated EBITDA margin for FY26 was 11.4% (up from 11.3% in FY25). Q4 FY26 EBITDA margin was 8.0% (down from 10.3% in Q4 FY25 and 11.9% in Q3 FY26).

Management forward view

New Leadership Appointments

Mr. Gregory Gelhaus appointed as Group Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Ankit Nayyar as Deputy Chief Financial Officer.

Dividend Recommendation

The Board recommended a final dividend of ₹1 per equity share, bringing the total dividend for FY26 to ₹2 per share.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Consolidated EBITDA Margin8.0% (Q4 FY26)Stabilization and improvement from Q4 levels, especially given the strong order book.
Order Intake Growth20% YoY (FY26)Continued double-digit growth to sustain backlog and revenue pipeline.
Working Capital CycleReceivable days 48, Payable days 49Improvement in receivable and payable days to optimize cash conversion.
Exceptional Items₹47 Cr (FY26 net)Resolution of exceptional items and their impact on adjusted profitability in future periods.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
67Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 52nd percentile of the scored universe and 50th percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 52/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
116 docs text-extracted · 63 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
52nd percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 50th pctile, median 68 · Micro: 32nd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

116 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
52
watch · capital discipline
Results
61
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 4.6%.
  • ▸10 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROE is low at 6.7%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

4 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 2 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement Under Regulation 30 (LODR) - Credit Rating 14 Aug - CRISIL assigns GMM Pfaudler ESG 61 'Strong' for FY26, up from 50 in FY25.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.