Skip to content

The Anup Engineering Limited (ANUP)

Micro Cap

Industrials stocks · Micro cap · NSE

The Anup Engineering Limited, part of the Lalbhai Group, manufactures static and rotary equipment for heavy engineering. It serves diverse sectors like Oil & Gas, Power, Chemicals, and Fertilizers, with manufacturing plants in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu. The company is net debt-free.

₹1,488.5
+5.50 · +0.37%
Market cap ₹3,027 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:51 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:51 pm IST
Base fundamentals14 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result06 Aug, 05:32 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

33Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -10.4% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 50
Sector 3M: -6.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

ANUPD candles · FIT view-32.2%
Latest close ₹1429.30 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-4.0%
RSI
24
MACD hist
-1.75
52W pos
1%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹1489.00H ₹1492.70L ₹1420.00C ₹1429.30Vol 32,019 sh
₹1.37k₹1.64k₹1.91k₹2.18k₹2.45k52L₹1429.302026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

ANUPNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-38%-23%-7%+8%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026ANUP -34.0%Nifty India Manufactu… -5.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
ANUP
-34.0%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-5.8%
Vs Nifty 500
-28.4 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-42.4%
₹2,479.9
52W range position
1%
₹1,420 - ₹2,479.9
ATR (14)
3.6%
₹51.8
Volume vs 20D
1.39x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹3.6 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹1,420 - ₹1,728
28.9% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
50

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -28.5% · PAT -97.8% YoY

Technical
Bearish
33

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+10.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
72

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -29% YoY · PAT -98% YoY · margin compression

Filed 06 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹125.3 Cr-28.5%-39.7%
EBITDA₹9.5 Cr-76.5%-75.2%
Operating margin7.6%-1547 bps-1084 bps
PAT₹0.6 Cr-97.8%-97.8%
PAT margin0.5%-1453 bps-1231 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
35.30
P/B
4.38
EV/EBITDA
18.24
Market Cap
3027.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
17.10%
ROCE
21.00%
ROA
8.75%
Dividend Y
0.79%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
24.00%
EPS 5Y
16.00%
Revenue 3Y
26.00%
EPS 3Y
29.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.16
Interest Coverage
15.89×
Altman Z
8.50
Book Value
345.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
2.00 Cr
EPS TTM
42.27

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
40.92%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
9%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 125-39.7% vs prev
0232.3Mar 2023: 144Jun 2023: 125Sep 2023: 140Jun 2024: 146Sep 2024: 193Dec 2024: 172Mar 2025: 222Jun 2025: 175Sep 2025: 232Dec 2025: 207Mar 2026: 208Jun 2026: 125FY23Q1 23Q2 23Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 0.6-97.9% vs prev
032.5Mar 2023: 19.5Jun 2023: 18.6Sep 2023: 21.7Jun 2024: 24.0Sep 2024: 32.5Dec 2024: 30.2Mar 2025: 31.5Jun 2025: 26.3Sep 2025: 32.0Dec 2025: 25.5Mar 2026: 26.5Jun 2026: 0.6FY23Q1 23Q2 23Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 24.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~11.6% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 24 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

10
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-12.8%
3M return
-34.0%
6M return
-30.4%
1Y return
-37.9%
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
-7
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
#19
Stage evidence
  • Price is 25.4% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.0% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 64.24-2.99%
62738597109Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2664
RS vs Nifty 50064

Valuation & peers

U-Score 50 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

50U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation4/30
Growth15/25
Quality13/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
50

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

50/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 10.4%.
  • Quality contributes 13/20 to the score.

Main drags

  • Valuation is weaker at 4/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
35.3
PB
4.4
EV/EBITDA
18.2
ROE
17.1%
ROCE
21.0%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
+10.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
50
Previous: 50
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+10.4%
Previous: +10.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
50
50
50
50
50

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹572.82
-159.9% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
39.3
Growth-justified Value
₹1,661.21
+10.4% MoS
PEG
1.67

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
COCKERILL
Small
John Cockerill India Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 78
18
183.0
8.9%
-6211%
OVERVALUED
ISGEC
Small
Isgec Heavy Engineering Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 78
27
25.3
4.2%
-982%
OVERVALUED
GMMPFAUDLR
Micro
GMM Pfaudler Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 78
21
47.2
6.7%
-1364%
OVERVALUED
TAURIAN
SME
Taurian MPS Ltd.
Industrial Machinery
match 75
56
33.9
26.7%
+14%
FAIR VALUE
GREAVESCOT
Micro
Greaves Cotton Limited
Industrial Machinery
match 55
31
47.8
8.1%
-19%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-10-11T14:10:26.011Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q1 FY27 revenue and EBITDA declined significantly YoY due to lower execution from prior year's low order booking, compounded by global uncertainties and cost pressures. However, the company achieved its highest-ever order booking of ~₹315 Cr, boosting its pending orderbook to ₹985 Cr.

Q1 FY27 results show a sharp decline in revenue and profitability, attributed to past low order booking and external cost pressures. Management prioritized profitability over short-term growth, maintaining gross margins. The record order booking and robust pipeline offer a strong rebound potential, but execution and margin recovery are critical.

Current business mix

Consolidated Industry Wise Revenue Share in Q1 FY27

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 6 reported categories.

Businessmix
Oil & Gas40.0%
Power & Energy22.0%
Chemicals & Silos11.0%
Petrochemicals11.0%
Fertilizers9.0%
Hydrogen7.0%
Growth engines

Thermal Power Plants

Booked order of more than ₹150 Cr for Thermal Power plants, entering in to elite group of manufacturers of Critical Heat-Exchangers for the sector, which is expected to see significant growth.

Proprietary License Products

Bagged order of two proprietary license products in line with strategic intent to move in to niche segment.

Technical Services Business

Good traction in the Technical Services business, supported by strong execution and high customer satisfaction.

New Critical & Proprietary Products

Continuous endeavor to add new critical and proprietary products to create more niche space.

Capacity and execution

Kheda Plant Phase 2A

One full bay is commissioned in Q2 FY26 and one open bay is commissioned in Jan’26.

Tailwinds

Domestic Demand Pickup

Orderbook between Domestic (61%) and Exports (39%), suggesting pick up in domestic demand.

Power Sector Growth

Thermal Power plants sector is expected to see significant growth in near future.

Foray into New Energy Segments

Foray into the Nuclear, Thermal energy and clean energy storage segment, positions the company well to enhance capabilities, diversify revenue base and strengthen its long-term outlook.

Headwinds

Global Uncertainties & Costs

Ongoing global uncertainties, supply chain challenges, elevated freight and energy costs, added additional pressure on availability and prices of raw material.

Low Prior Order Booking

Performance during the quarter reflects a planned lower execution due to low order booking during last year.

Risk radar

Global Volatility

Considering the current global volatile business scenarios due to wars & geopolitics.

Execution Risk

Focus of the company this year will be more on Stabilization of current operations, better Execution, Consolidation and Risk mitigation.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

The company explicitly provides Q1 FY27 vs Q1 FY26 data. For an industrial company with project-based execution, year-on-year comparison is more relevant to account for project cycles and seasonality, rather than sequential quarter-on-quarter fluctuations.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Order Booking

Highest ever order booking during the quarter of ~₹315 Cr.

Pending Orderbook

Best pending orderbook visibility (including LOI) of ₹985 Cr.

Revenue from Operation

Revenue from operation 125.2 Cr (Q1 FY27) vs 175.2 Cr (Q1 FY26), -28.5%.

EBITDA

EBIDTA 9.5 Cr (Q1 FY27) vs 40.4 Cr (Q1 FY26), -76.5%.

Management forward view

Prioritizing Profitability

Despite challenges on growth front, we chose to wait out, protecting profitability over short term growth.

FY27 Strategic Focus

Focus of the company this year will be more on Stabilization of current operations, better Execution, Consolidation and Risk mitigation.

Diversification & Niche Products

Foray into the Nuclear, Thermal energy and clean energy storage segment... Continuous endeavor to add new critical and proprietary products to create more niche space.

Technical Services Growth

The company wishes to strategically grow the Technical services business vertical to boost growth and enhance profitability.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Order Book Execution₹985 Cr pending orderbook (including LOI), with ~₹240 Cr booked for FY28.Timely execution of the record order book to translate into revenue and profit.
EBITDA Margin RecoveryQ1 FY27 EBITDA margin at 7.6% due to fixed cost under-absorption, gross margin intact.EBITDA margin improvement as revenue scales up and fixed costs are better absorbed.
New Segment TractionForay into Nuclear, Thermal energy, and clean energy storage segments.Successful project wins and execution in new strategic segments.
Technical Services GrowthGood traction in Technical Services business.Sustained growth and enhanced profitability from the Technical Services vertical.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Trust Score
72Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 69th percentile of the scored universe and 67th percentile within Industrials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 24/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
87 docs text-extracted · 23 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
69th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 67th pctile, median 68 · Micro: 50th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

87 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
90
strong · capital discipline
Results
24
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸4 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸ROCE is 21%.

Trust risks

  • ▸0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 15.5%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

7 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Aug - Newspaper Advertisement regarding Special Window for transfer and dematerialisation of physical securities

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 10 Aug - Intimation of Institutional Investor/Analyst Meet - Equirus Annual India Conference'26

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 1 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 20 Jun

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.