Skip to content

Faze Three Limited (FAZE3Q)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Faze Three Limited operates in Home Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹448.75
+30.95 · +7.41%
Market cap ₹1,044 Cr
ThemesTextiles
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 05:56 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 05:56 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result11 Aug, 07:27 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

39Bearish

SMA20 -11.9% / mo · MACD + · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

FAZE3QD candles · FIT view-3.8%
Latest close ₹448.75 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+6.3%
RSI
53
MACD hist
3.69
52W pos
39%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹422.00H ₹460.10L ₹418.40C ₹448.75Vol 1.3L sh
₹377.79₹449.09₹520.40₹591.71₹663.0152H₹448.752026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

FAZE3QNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-34%-19%-4%+11%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026FAZE3Q -20.5%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
FAZE3Q
-20.5%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-14.9 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-31.0%
₹650.1
52W range position
39%
₹322.1 - ₹650.1
ATR (14)
5.6%
₹25
Volume vs 20D
2.57x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹2.4 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹390.8 - ₹465
62.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
21

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +8.2% · PAT -24.5% YoY

Technical
Bearish
39

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-305.3%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
57

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -25% YoY · margin compression · Rev +8% YoY

Filed 11 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹229.4 Cr+8.2%-17.2%
EBITDA₹21.4 Cr-13.3%-37.1%
Operating margin9.3%-231 bps-294 bps
PAT₹9.6 Cr-24.5%-50.8%
PAT margin4.2%-182 bps-287 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
34.30
P/B
2.28
EV/EBITDA
11.88
Market Cap
1044.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
6.44%
ROCE
10.10%
ROA
3.66%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
23.00%
EPS 5Y
2.00%
Revenue 3Y
18.00%
EPS 3Y
-22.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.61
Interest Coverage
3.76×
Altman Z
4.10
Book Value
186.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
3/5
OCF
58.00 Cr
EPS TTM
12.51

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
58.01%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
31%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 923+33.8% vs prev
0923.0Mar 2009: 139Mar 2018: 240Mar 2019: 269Mar 2020: 302Mar 2021: 324Mar 2022: 504Mar 2023: 558Mar 2024: 565Mar 2025: 690Mar 2026: 923FY09FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 34.0-17.1% vs prev
-19.0058.0Mar 2009: -19.0Mar 2018: 17.0Mar 2019: 15.0Mar 2020: 18.0Mar 2021: 25.0Mar 2022: 51.0Mar 2023: 58.0Mar 2024: 47.0Mar 2025: 41.0Mar 2026: 34.0FY09FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 7.5-23.0% vs prev
-36.5018.4Mar 2009: -36.5%Mar 2018: 9.9%Mar 2019: 8.1%Mar 2020: 9.0%Mar 2021: 11.1%Mar 2022: 18.4%Mar 2023: 17.4%Mar 2024: 12.4%Mar 2025: 9.8%Mar 2026: 7.5%FY09FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 53. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • Recent death cross (SMA50 crossed below SMA200).
  • SMA20 falling (~13.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 53 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 31% off 52W high · 39% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

45
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
+1.3%
3M return
-20.5%
6M return
-4.3%
1Y return
-12.2%
RS 1D
+10
RS 20D
+6
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#36
Stage evidence
  • Price is 9.4% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -0.8%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 101.14+8.52%
7187104120137Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26101
RS vs Nifty 500101

Valuation & peers

U-Score 21 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

21U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth7/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet6/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
21

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

21/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 6/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -305.3%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
34.3
PB
2.3
EV/EBITDA
11.9
ROE
6.4%
ROCE
10.1%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
-305.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
21
Previous: 21
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-305.3%
Previous: -305.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹228.81
-96.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
8.8
Growth-justified Value
₹110.71
-305.3% MoS
PEG
17.15

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
HIMATSEIDE
Small
Himatsingka Seide Limited
Textiles
match 89
57
14.5
3.0%
+60%
FAIR VALUE
BELLACASA
Small
Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited
Textiles
match 84
54
17.6
12.7%
+47%
FAIR VALUE
RUPA
Small
Rupa & Company Limited
Textiles
match 65
35
13.0
7.4%
-362%
WATCHLIST
IRISDOREME
Small
Iris Clothings Limited
Textiles
match 64
36
64.7
14.4%
-104%
WATCHLIST
PASHUPATI
Small
Pashupati Cotspin Limited
Textiles
match 64
33
74.6
6.5%
-156%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Faze Three Limited operates in Home Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
57Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 20th percentile of the scored universe and 22nd percentile within Consumer. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 30/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
41 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
20th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 22nd pctile, median 66 · Small: 23rd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

41 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
55
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
39
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 58%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROE is low at 6.4%.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -2.6%.
  • ▸Revenue CAGR is 18% but EPS CAGR is -22%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

12 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Letter Sent To Shareholders Whose E-Mails Addresses Are Not Registered With Company/RTA/DP 13 Aug - 41st AGM on September 4, 2026; annual report FY2025-26 shared via website and e-voting details issued.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 5 Sep - AGM approved appointment of Mohit Dinesh Solanki as Independent Director from August 17, 2026 for 5 years.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationAug 2026

Aug 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 20 Aug - Faze Three schedules investor meetings with Shanghvi Family Office, Coheron Wealth, and Phillip Capital on August 26, 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 20 Aug - Management to meet investors on August 25, 2026 via virtual one-to-one and group sessions.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 14 Aug - Please find the attached Newspaper Advertisement published today, August 14, 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 21 Aug - Please refer the attached disclosure for schedule of investor meetings/conferences.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 9 Jul - CARE reaffirmed Faze Three’s ₹280 crore bank facilities at CARE A; Stable and CARE A1.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Resignation of Director 10 Jun - Manan Shah resigned as Independent Director effective June 10, 2026, citing personal reasons.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationMay 2026

May 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationMay 2026

May 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 25 May - The Company, in addition to the requisite publications in the newspapers in compliance with Regulation 47 of the SEBI Listing Regulations, has also published an …

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.