May 2026 · PPT
Source: Nse
Services stocks · SME cap · NSE
Encompass Design India Ltd. is a multi-brand digital-first enterprise that evolved from a trading company. It operates across three verticals: Trading & Supply Chain, E-commerce Services, and Own Consumer Brands (Stoa Paris, Small Batch, QuirkLoom), focusing on innovation, brands, and e-commerce.
SMA20 -1.9% / mo · MACD −
FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but exact sector-index confirmation is unavailable. View sector evidence
Daily history is available from 2025-12-12; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
No exact NSE sector index is mapped for this company. Nifty 500 remains the broad-market comparison.
Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue NDF · PAT NDF YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
YoY comparison unavailable - result verdict pending data
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹40 Cr | NDF | +42.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹12 Cr | NDF | +33.3% |
| Operating margin | 30.0% | NDF | -100 bps |
| PAT | ₹8 Cr | NDF | +60.0% |
| PAT margin | 20.0% | NDF | +214 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 19/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 45.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 54 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
ENCOMPAS reported strong FY26 results with Revenue up 24.6% YoY to ₹6,812 L and PAT up 20.8% YoY to ₹1,302 L. EBITDA margin held above 30% at 30.9%, and the company achieved a near debt-free status post-IPO with D/E at 0.16x, significantly improving liquidity with a current ratio of 2.92x.
The company demonstrates robust growth across its diversified business pillars, particularly in its high-growth Own Consumer Brands segment. Strong profitability and a healthy balance sheet post-IPO suggest effective capital allocation and operational efficiency. The strategic focus on premiumization and omnichannel expansion appears well-defined.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.
Scaling at +56% YoY in FY26, with a +94% CAGR from FY23-FY26.
Decade-plus close-network B2B business with +34% CAGR from FY23-FY26.
Digital services & rewards/loyalty platforms with +36% CAGR from FY23-FY26.
Expanding SKU count from 5-10 to 50+ within brands.
Expanding into quick commerce, strategic retail, and international markets.
Strategy to analyze high Total Addressable Market (TAM) categories for premiumisation gaps.
Focus on identifying and catering to underserved affluent segments.
General market, macroeconomic, governmental, and regulatory trends could cause actual results to differ.
Competitive pressures are identified as a factor that could cause actual developments and results to differ materially.
Technological developments are cited as a key factor that could impact future business developments.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
The investor presentation primarily focuses on annual financial results, comparing FY26 performance against FY25, and explicitly states year-on-year growth rates for key financial metrics.
Enabling 65+ brands across categories and price tiers.
2,800+ SKUs across all brands.
>65K+ No. of Customers.
10+ Active Channels including D2C, marketplaces, Q-comm, MT/GT.
Management employs a structured playbook for brand creation, validation, and scaling, aiming for a high success rate.
Future plans include expanding brand presence through quick commerce, strategic retail, and international markets.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Branded Revenue Growth | +56% YoY in FY26 | Sustained double-digit growth and market share gains in premium segments. |
| EBITDA Margin | 30.9% in FY26 | Maintenance of margins above 30% as the company scales its brand portfolio and services. |
| Debt-Equity Ratio | 0.16x in FY26 | Continued low leverage and efficient capital management to fund growth initiatives. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 63rd percentile of the scored universe and 73rd percentile within Services. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Services: 73rd pctile, median 66 · SME: 81st pctile, median 64
1 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Nse
Source: Nse