IP
IndiaPulse

Cochin Shipyard Limited (COCHINSHIP)

Mid Cap

Industrials stocks · Mid cap · NSE

Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL) is a leading Indian shipbuilding and ship repair company, serving both defence and commercial sectors. The company is expanding its capabilities with new dry docks and an International Ship Repair Facility, aiming to enhance capacity for large vessels and increase ship repair throughput.

₹1,499.1
+12.40 · +0.83%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.4 (n=540)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
30

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
63

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
50

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
24

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -20% YoY · margin compression · Rev +2% YoY

Filed 14 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,094 Cr+2.3%-26.3%
EBITDA₹193 Cr-19.9%-37.7%
Operating margin18.0%-500 bps-300 bps
PAT₹151 Cr-19.7%-45.3%
PAT margin13.8%-379 bps-480 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-14T07:11:04.710Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q1 FY26 consolidated turnover grew 50.5% YoY, driven by strong ship repair segment, but PAT growth was muted at 3.9% YoY due to significant margin compression. QoQ, revenue and profits declined sharply.

Q1 FY26 results show robust YoY revenue growth, primarily from ship repair, but profitability lagged due to margin contraction. The substantial QoQ decline in both revenue and profit, coupled with a significant shift in revenue mix towards ship repair, suggests potential execution challenges or project phasing issues in shipbuilding. The large order pipeline is promising but mostly in early stages.

Current business mix

Revenue by Segment (Standalone Q1 FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Ship Repair64.4%
Shipbuilding35.6%
Growth engines

Ship Repair Segment Growth

Q1 FY26 Standalone Ship Repair revenue grew 157% YoY to Rs. 629.62 Crs, becoming the largest revenue contributor.

New Shipbuilding Opportunities

MoU with HD KSOE, South Korea, for joint exploration of new building opportunities in India and abroad, and sharing technical expertise.

Ship Repair Cluster Development

MoU with Drydocks World, UAE, to explore joint development of world-class ship repair clusters at Kochi and Vadinar.

Large Order Pipeline

Shipbuilding order pipeline of approximately Rs. 2,85,000 Crs, with Rs. 2,20,000 Crs in Defence and Rs. 65,000 Crs in Commercial segments.

Capacity and execution

New Dry Dock Commissioned

Capex completed for a new dry dock capable of building and repairing large vessels, including SuexMax/Capesize and Aircraft Carriers, and docking Jack-up Rigs.

International Ship Repair Facility (ISRF) Commissioned

Capex completed for ISRF, capable of repairing ships up to 130m length (Naval, Offshore, Coastal Vessels), with a capacity of 82 ships per year.

Tailwinds

Government Support for Domestic Manufacturing

The company's presentation highlights 'Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyan' (Self-reliant India campaign), indicating potential government impetus for domestic shipbuilding and repair.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is essential to assess underlying growth trends, especially for a project-based business that can have quarterly lumpiness. QoQ is critical to understand sequential momentum, project execution, and the impact of revenue mix shifts on margins.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Order Inflow

Received new orders for construction of two 70 T Bollard Pull Tugs from Polestar Maritime Limited and one Luxury River Cruise vessel from Heritage River Journeys Private Limited in June 2025.

Order Book

Total order book position is approximately Rs. 21,100 Crs, comprising Rs. 19,600 Crs in shipbuilding and Rs. 1,500 Crs in ship repair.

Revenue Cover

The order book of approximately Rs. 21,100 Crs provides healthy and clear visibility on revenue.

Execution

Delivered the 19th Electric Hybrid 100 Pax Water Metro boat to Kochi Metro and the first dry cargo vessel to a European client by Udupi-CSL in April 2025.

Management forward view

Revenue Visibility from Order Book

Management states the approximately Rs. 21,100 Crs order book provides 'Healthy – Clear Visibility on Revenue'.

Focus on Productivity and Capacity Utilization

MoU with HD KSOE aims to identify initiatives to enhance productivity and capacity utilization.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Order Inflow ConversionRs. 2,85,000 Crs pipeline, mostly in RFI/Expected RFI stage.Conversion of large pipeline orders into firm contracts, especially in the Defence segment.
Margin TrendConsolidated EBITDA margin 28% (Q1 FY26), PAT margin 18% (Q1 FY26), both down YoY.Stabilization and improvement of margins, particularly in the shipbuilding segment, as new facilities ramp up.
Execution PaceQ1 FY26 standalone shipbuilding revenue down 25% YoY and 57% QoQ.Improved execution and revenue recognition from the shipbuilding segment, leveraging new dry dock capacity.
Net DebtRs. 152.85 Crs (Consolidated Q1 FY26).Trends in net debt, especially with ongoing capex and working capital requirements.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

50Neutral

SMA20 +6.0% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 51
Sector RS: 48
Sector 3M: -1.6% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

COCHINSHIPdaily · 1Y · AUTO+3.6%
Latest close ₹1499.10 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.7%
RSI
53
MACD hist
-4.67
52W pos
39%
2026-09-04O ₹1488.90H ₹1522.90L ₹1486.00C ₹1499.10Vol 6.3L sh
₹1.15k₹1.33k₹1.51k₹1.70k₹1.88k52L1499.102026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 53.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 rising (~5.6% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 53 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 24% off 52W high · 26% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

34
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-1.4%
3M return
+4.0%
6M return
+3.8%
1Y return
-17.7%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
+2
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 1.4% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -0.2% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 87.27+0.84%
778696106115Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2687
RS vs Nifty 50087

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 30 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

30U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth10/25
Quality5/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
30

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

30/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 9/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 10/25 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -430.9%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 5/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
58.0
PB
6.7
EV/EBITDA
46.1
ROE
12.5%
ROCE
16.0%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.3
MoS
-430.9%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
30
Previous: 30
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-430.9%
Previous: -430.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹360.21
-316.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
10.9
Growth-justified Value
₹282.39
-430.9% MoS
PEG
9.06

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
63Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 38th percentile of the scored universe and 35th percentile within Industrials. Main check: results consistency is weak at 24/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 67.9%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-1234 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
83 docs text-extracted · 27 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
38th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 35th pctile, median 68 · Mid: 21st pctile, median 76

Evidence depth
Financial-only

83 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
24
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 67.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 7 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-1234 Cr.
  • ROCE trend is -3%.
  • 0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
58.00
P/B
6.72
EV/EBITDA
46.14
Market Cap
39438.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
12.50%
ROCE
16.00%
ROA
4.68%
Dividend Y
0.50%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
12.00%
EPS 5Y
4.00%
Revenue 3Y
29.00%
EPS 3Y
40.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.28
Interest Coverage
7.20×
Altman Z
3.95
Book Value
223.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
-1234.00 Cr
EPS TTM
25.86

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
67.91%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
39%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Industrials, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.