IP
IndiaPulse

Alkyl Amines Chemicals Limited (ALKYLAMINE)

Micro Cap

Chemicals stocks · Micro cap · NSE

Alkyl Amines Chemicals Limited manufactures aliphatic amines and specialty chemicals. The company serves diverse end-user industries including pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, rubber chemicals, water treatment, and electronic chemicals.

₹2,020.9
+17.70 · +0.88%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Chemicals P/E 34.2 (n=45)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend supports entry, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
62

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
80

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bullish
69

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
41

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 100/100

Rev +30% YoY · PAT +94% YoY · margin expansion · +36% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 04 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹528 Cr+30.1%+36.4%
EBITDA₹134 Cr+74.0%+88.7%
Operating margin25.0%+600 bps+700 bps
PAT₹95 Cr+93.9%+111.1%
PAT margin18.0%+592 bps+636 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-08T07:08:54.396Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 top line and bottom line remained flat YoY, with Q4 operations facing challenges due to ammonia sourcing disruptions and raw material price volatility.

FY26 performance was flat, impacted by raw material price volatility and increased competition in methylamines. While management expects margin improvement and volume growth, geopolitical uncertainty and overcapacity in a key product segment pose ongoing challenges.

Current business mix

Sales by End-User Industry

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Pharma55.0%
Agro17.5%
Other27.5%
Growth engines

Acetonitrile Demand

We are optimistic that in acetonitrile and peptides, there will be some volume growth.

Peptides Segment

There is still a lot of optimism, a lot of talk about growth, but most of it has to still materialize. It's a great addition to the acetonitrile market.

New Product Development

Products which we are already launching, which will probably come into the market in July, are also from our R&D pipeline.

Capacity and execution

Kurkumbh Project Commissioning

The project will probably be commissioned at the beginning of the next quarter (Q1 FY27). Mechanical completion is going to be completed somewhere at the end of June.

Existing Product Capacity

We have enough capacity for the next few years without having to invest anything more in the existing product capacities.

Tailwinds

Reduced Chinese Aggression

We have seen over the last quarter, a reduction in the aggressiveness of the Chinese, and we hope it will continue.

Antidumping Duty on Acetonitrile

We got the benefit of that antidumping duty towards the end of the year, leading to some improvement in our pricing.

Pharma Industry Demand

The pharma has always been a little optimistic. They were exempt from most of these tariffs.

Headwinds

Raw Material Price Volatility

The immediate impact of the war has been that the prices have risen both of our raw materials.

Ammonia Sourcing Disruption

We had a few challenges in March in operations, but we have, by and large, overcome it.

Methylamine Overcapacity

There is an overhang of capacity because a new player has come in. Aarti has also commissioned their plant.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Uncertainty

The future remains a little uncertain as long as the war continues, which we hope will get resolved soon.

Demand Destruction from High Prices

It is a bit difficult to predict whether this will have an impact on the demand. Currently, we haven't seen it because it's too early.

Competition in Methylamines

Now that we have 4 players in methylamine in the country, we expect there will be competition.

Monsoon Impact on Agro Demand

There is a little bit of concern that agro could be affected, not pharma as much as agro because they expect this monsoon also with the El Nino.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

FY26 results are compared YoY for overall annual performance. Q4 commentary highlights recent impacts of geopolitical events on raw material sourcing and prices, making QoQ relevant for sequential momentum and margin shifts.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

FY26 Volume Growth

Volume and value have been basically flat, plus-minus 1% either way; prices dropped 1% and volume probably dropped 1%.

Capacity Utilization

On an average, we must be having between 60% and 85% capacity utilization across our plants.

Ammonia Raw Material Price

Ammonia was in the region of about INR50 a kg and now we are over INR100 a kg.

Acetonitrile Product Price

Today, I think we are at about INR250 per kg. Last year's average, it came down to something like INR140, INR150.

Management forward view

Cautious Optimism

We look forward to what I would say, cautious optimism. I think we will do better than what we have over the last 3 years.

Expected Volume Growth

We expect that the next year will be like a normal year, which is about 5% to 10% growth rate.

FY27 Capex Plan

There is no major business project, just a bit of what is left over from the current new product plant at Dahej and a few engineering projects, around INR80 crores to INR90 crores.

R&D Product Disclosure Policy

We do not talk about our R&D products till the product is in the market. We announce it to the market after the plant is commissioned.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Kurkumbh Project CommissioningMechanical completion by end of June, commissioning in Q1 FY27.Timely commissioning and ramp-up of the new project to contribute to revenue.
Raw Material Price StabilizationAmmonia prices over INR100/kg, other RMs also rising.Stabilization of supply chains and raw material prices, expected in 3-6 months, to reduce volatility.
Methylamine Capacity UtilizationOvercapacity due to new player (Aarti) commissioning plant.Signs of market absorption of new methylamine capacity and impact on competitive intensity and margins.
Chinese Import AggressivenessReduction in aggressiveness observed in the last quarter.Continued reduction in Chinese imports and pricing aggression to support domestic margins.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

69Bullish

full bull SMA stack · SMA20 +7.2% / mo · MACD − · near 52W high

Stock trend: 78
Sector RS: 57
Sector 3M: +0.0% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

ALKYLAMINEdaily · 1Y · AUTO+44.3%
Latest close ₹2020.90 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+1.1%
RSI
57
MACD hist
-5.45
52W pos
89%
2026-09-04O ₹1999.00H ₹2068.10L ₹1999.00C ₹2020.90Vol 97,864 sh
₹1.17k₹1.42k₹1.66k₹1.91k₹2.16k52H52L2020.902026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 57. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price > SMA20 > SMA50 > SMA200 — full bullish stack.
  • SMA20 rising (~6.7% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 57 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 5% off 52W high · 67% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 62 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

62U-SCORE
Premium Compounder

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth21/25
Quality20/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow7/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-1
Raw sum
62

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

62/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Quality contributes 20/20 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 21/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 1 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -13.8%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
54.5
PB
19.3
EV/EBITDA
36.7
ROE
41.4%
ROCE
41.3%
FCF Yield
1.4%
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
-13.8%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
62
Previous: 62
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
-13.8%
Previous: -13.8%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -1 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
63
33
63
63
63
33
63
33
63
63
63
62

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹305.37
-561.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹1,776.15
-13.8% MoS
PEG
1.32

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
80Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 90th percentile of the scored universe and 85th percentile within Chemicals. Main check: results consistency is weak at 41/100.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 72%. Key concern: 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
46 docs text-extracted · 37 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
90th percentile

overall median 67 · Chemicals: 85th pctile, median 73 · Micro: 81st pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

46 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
98
strong · capital discipline
Results
41
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 72%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1.4%.
  • 8 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
54.50
P/B
19.25
EV/EBITDA
36.70
Market Cap
10336.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
41.40%
ROCE
41.30%
ROA
25.67%
Dividend Y
0.49%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
33.00%
Revenue 3Y
26.00%
EPS 3Y
54.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.16
Interest Coverage
25.70×
Altman Z
9.54
Book Value
105.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
1.42%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
188.00 Cr
EPS TTM
39.47

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
72.04%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
89%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Chemicals, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.