Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 24 Sep - Crisil assigned AA-/Stable and A1+ ratings to Aether’s Rs.636 crore bank facilities.
Source: Bse
Chemicals stocks · Micro cap · NSE
Aether Industries Limited is an Indian specialty chemical manufacturer, focusing on advanced intermediates and specialty chemicals. It operates through Contract Manufacturing (CEM), Contract Research & Manufacturing Services (CRAMS), and Large Scale Manufacturing (LSM) business models, serving diverse sectors including Pharma, Oil & Gas, and Material Science.
SMA20 +2.7% / mo · MACD − · sector -4.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +27.2% · PAT +34.0% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +27% YoY · PAT +34% YoY · +7% QoQ · operating leverage · margin compression
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹327 Cr | +27.2% | +7.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹103 Cr | +27.2% | +24.1% |
| Operating margin | 31.0% | -100 bps | +400 bps |
| PAT | ₹63 Cr | +34.0% | +16.7% |
| PAT margin | 19.3% | +98 bps | +157 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 35. Wait for confirmation.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 29 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Chemicals — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Aether Industries reported strong FY26 financial performance with revenue up 38% YoY, EBITDA up 53% YoY, and PAT up 39% YoY, driven by CEM and CRAMS. Q4FY26 saw revenue up 27% YoY, but EBITDA and PAT growth were modest at 6% and 7% YoY, impacted by a warehouse fire.
Strong FY26 growth, particularly in CEM/CRAMS, supports the long-term thesis. However, Q4FY26 results were tempered by a warehouse fire and year-end provisions, requiring close monitoring of operational stability and new capacity ramp-up. New capacity commissioning is on track.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 4 reported categories.
CEM and CRAMS contribute more than 55% of revenue and led strong financial performance in FY26.
19 new customers onboarded across all business models during FY26.
R&D expansion on track with 18 fume hoods being installed and a new R&D Centre being expanded.
Site 3++ commenced production in February end and is being ramped up.
Site 5 Phase one - 2 production blocks - solvent trials begun, commercial production by Q1 FY27 (June 2026).
18 Fume Hoods being installed in the current R&D and New R&D Centre being expanded in adjacent land.
Strong traction with customers across different sectors.
Growing CEM contracts and volume-led LSM demand.
Q4 FY26 EBITDA and PAT impacted by ₹70M loss of inventories due to fire at an external warehouse in March 2026 and certain year-end provisions.
Impact of loss of inventories on account of fire at external warehouse in March 2026.
Strategic supply from Site 3++ to ramp up in Q1 FY27; Site 5 commercial production by Q1 FY27.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
Both YoY and QoQ comparisons are relevant. YoY provides a view of annual growth and seasonal performance, while QoQ highlights sequential momentum, especially with new capacity ramp-ups and recent operational impacts.
FY26: ₹11,601M (+38% Y/Y); Q4 FY26: ₹3,051M (+27% Y/Y)
FY26: ₹3,547M (+53% Y/Y, 31% margin); Q4 FY26: ₹814M (+6% Y/Y, 27% margin)
FY26: ₹2,195M (+39% Y/Y, 19% margin); Q4 FY26: ₹540M (+7% Y/Y, 18% margin)
FY26: ₹862.13M, accounting for 7.3% of revenues.
Strategic supply from Site 3++ to ramp up in Q1 FY27.
Site 5 Phase one - 2 production blocks - commercial production by Q1 FY27.
Team structure being reaffirmed to meet requirements.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Site 3++ Ramp-up | Commenced production in February end. | Strategic supply ramp-up in Q1 FY27. |
| Site 5 Commercial Production | Solvent trials begun for Phase one. | Commercial production by Q1 FY27 (June 2026). |
| CEM and CRAMS Contribution | Contribute more than 55% of revenue. | Continued growth and margin contribution from these segments. |
| Operational Stability | Q4 FY26 impacted by warehouse fire. | Absence of further disruptions and normalized margins in subsequent quarters. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 75th percentile of the scored universe and 55th percentile within Chemicals. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 43/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Chemicals: 55th pctile, median 73 · Micro: 56th pctile, median 73
83 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse