IP
IndiaPulse

Addictive Learning Technology Ltd. (ADDICTIVE)

SME Cap

IT stocks · SME cap · NSE

Addictive Learning Technology Ltd. (formerly Addictive Learning Technology Private Limited) is an Indian company operating in the learning technology sector, with its website lawsikho.in.

₹43.3
+0.30 · +0.70%
Quote04 Sept, 03:32 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage11/14 · 79%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · IT P/E 22.6 (n=200)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
31

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
60

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
54

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
45

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 30/100

YoY data unavailable — classification deferred

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹22.7 CrNDF+58.8%
EBITDA₹4.8 Cr-14.7%+647.1%
Operating margin21.0%-568 bps+2707 bps
PAT₹0.3 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin1.4%-479 bps+2761 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis intactReviewed 2026-06-18T07:30:58.426Z
Management commentary snapshot

No financial or operational results were provided in the document for the half-year and year ended March 31, 2026.

No financial or operational data is available in the provided document to assess the company's performance or the status of any investment thesis. The document only confirms the upload of the earnings call transcript.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

No financial or operational data is available in the provided document to determine the most appropriate comparison basis for performance analysis.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

54Neutral

SMA20 +9.8% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 53
Sector RS: 57
Sector 3M: +0.1% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

ADDICTIVEdaily · 1Y · AUTO-59.9%
Latest close ₹43.30 on 2026-09-04

Daily history is available from 2025-12-17; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.

Bar
+0.7%
RSI
48
MACD hist
-0.19
52W pos
6%
2026-09-04O ₹43.00H ₹44.75L ₹43.00C ₹43.30Vol 8,500 sh
₹33.51₹53.52₹73.53₹93.54₹113.5552L43.302026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 48. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 rising (~8.9% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 48 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 68% off 52W high · 17% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 31 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

31U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation7/30
Growth14/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
31

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

31/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 14/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

IT valuation: PE and EV/EBITDA against growth and margins

Asset-light IT companies deserve valuation support only when growth, margins, and cash conversion hold up.

IT PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA relative to revenue growth, margins, and cash conversion.
Secondary checks
Deal pipeline, attrition, dollar revenue growth, FCF yield.
Main risk check
Low PE can reflect weak growth or margin pressure.
PE
PB
0.9
EV/EBITDA
2.6
ROE
-0.6%
ROCE
-0.1%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
31
Previous: 31
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
31
31
31
41
31
31
31
41
31
31
31
31

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
Growth-justified P/E
33.8
Growth-justified Value
— MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
60Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 28th percentile of the scored universe and 26th percentile within IT. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 65.1%. Key concern: Only 1 years of positive FCF.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
4 docs text-extracted · 4 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
28th percentile

overall median 67 · IT: 26th pctile, median 69 · SME: 32nd pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

4 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
45
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 65.1%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ROCE is low at -0.1%.
  • ROE is low at -0.6%.
  • OPM spread across recent quarters is 32.8%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
P/B
0.88
EV/EBITDA
2.63
Market Cap
68.90Cr

Profitability

ROE
-0.61%
ROCE
-0.11%
ROA
-0.49%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
31.20%
EPS 5Y
108.13%
Revenue 3Y
31.00%
EPS 3Y
9.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
Altman Z
4.52
Book Value
49.40

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
15.90 Cr
EPS TTM
-0.30

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
65.10%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
5%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.