IP
IndiaPulse

Vardhman Textiles Limited (VTL)

Large Cap

Textiles stocks · Large cap · NSE

Vardhman Textiles Limited (VTL) is India's largest vertically integrated textile manufacturer with over 60 years of experience. It produces yarn, fabrics, garments, threads, fibres, and steels, serving a global footprint across 75+ countries. The company emphasizes consistency, reliability, flexibility, traceability, agility, and sustainability in its operations.

₹598.2
+9.55 · +1.62%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Textiles P/E 44.4 (n=11)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Mixed fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
FAIR VALUE
49

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
68

low confidence · 2/8 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
52

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
41

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 90/100

Rev +13% YoY · PAT +51% YoY · margin expansion · +8% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 30 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,703 Cr+13.3%+8.2%
EBITDA₹474 Cr+45.4%+61.2%
Operating margin18.0%+400 bps+600 bps
PAT₹315 Cr+51.4%+66.7%
PAT margin11.7%+293 bps+408 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-14T07:09:20.285Z
Management commentary snapshot

VTL reported a mixed Q4 FY26, with revenue slightly down YoY and QoQ. EBITDA and PAT saw significant YoY declines, reflecting margin pressure. Full-year FY26 revenue grew marginally, but profitability metrics (EBITDA, PAT) were lower than FY25, indicating a challenging operating environment despite capacity additions.

Despite ongoing capacity expansions and modernization efforts, VTL's profitability metrics (EBITDA, PAT, and their respective margins) declined significantly both YoY in Q4 FY26 and for the full FY26. The new capacities need to ramp up quickly and contribute meaningfully to offset the observed margin compression and justify the substantial capex.

Current business mix

Revenue by Product (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Yarn65.0%
Fabric35.0%
Growth engines

Yarn Capacity Expansion

improving

Expansion of about 15,600 spindles completed in H1 FY26; another 17,000 spindles completed. Open-end project to be started.

Processed Fabric Capacity Expansion

improving

Commercial production started for 31 million meters annually in March FY26.

Technical Textiles Unit

improving

Vardhman Performance Fabric (Synthetic Woven) unit started commercial production of 18 million meters annually in March FY26.

Garment Capacity Expansion

improving

Board approved expanding garment unit capacity from 2.2 million to 4.5 million shirts p.a. by end of FY2026-27 with Rs. 125 Cr investment.

Capacity and execution

Yarn Spindles

15,600 spindles completed in H1 FY26; 17,000 spindles completed. Open-end project to start.

Processed Fabric Line-4

Commercial production started for 31 million meters annually in March FY26.

Technical Textiles Unit

Commercial production started for 18 million meters annually in March FY26.

Garment Unit

Capacity to expand from 2.2 million to 4.5 million shirts p.a. by end of FY2026-27.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Jan 2026
Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is crucial for understanding annual trends and the impact of seasonal demand in the textile sector. QoQ comparison is important for assessing sequential momentum, the immediate impact of new capacity commissioning, and short-term operational efficiency changes.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue from Operations

Q4 FY26: Rs 2,441 Cr (-1% YoY, -0% QoQ). FY26: Rs 9,652 Cr (+1% YoY).

EBITDA Margin

deteriorating

Q4 FY26: 14.1% (-171bps YoY, -9bps QoQ). FY26: 15.1% (-127bps YoY).

PAT Margin

deteriorating

Q4 FY26: 7.1% (-175bps YoY, +42bps QoQ). FY26: 7.5% (-138bps YoY).

Yarn Production

improving

FY26: 277,072 MT (+4% YoY).

Management forward view

Sustainability Goals

Aim to achieve Net Zero Emissions by 2045, 30% reduction in freshwater consumption by 2030, and 60% green power generation by FY 2027-28.

Modernization & Technology Upgradation

Initiative largely completed, leading to improved operational efficiency and enhanced process capabilities.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
EBITDA MarginQ4 FY26: 14.1%Stabilization and improvement in margins as new capacities ramp up and contribute to economies of scale.
Yarn Production GrowthFY26: +4% YoYContinued positive growth reflecting demand and effective utilization of expanded capacities.
Processed Fabric Production Ramp-upNew capacity of 31 MM p.a. started in March FY26Utilization rates and revenue contribution from the newly commissioned processed fabric capacity.
Garment Capacity Expansion ProgressTargeting 4.5 MM shirts p.a. by end of FY2026-27Timely completion of the garment unit expansion and its subsequent revenue generation.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Show extracted source claims
capex timelinenot yet verifiablequantified

The Garment division's current capacity is intended to be doubled, taking about 8 months to complete once the project starts.

Timeframe: Medium-term (8 months post-start)Direction: Increase

"We intend to make it to the double from the current capacity."

macro expectationnot yet verifiablequantified

The figure of closed spindles could reach 15 million in the next 1 year, unless raw material prices are corrected.

Timeframe: Next 1 yearDirection: DecreaseConfidence: Moderate

"figure reaching to 15 million spindles in the next 1 year, unless the raw material prices are corrected, it can happen."

margin outlookdeliveredquantified

Industry margins will start improving if another 5 million to 7 million spindles get stopped in the country.

Timeframe: EventuallyDirection: ImproveConfidence: Moderate

"if another 5 million, 7 million spindles gets stopped into the country, I think then...the margins will start improving."

Outcome check: OPM moved from 11.0% to average 12.0% (+1.0 pp).

operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

Green power usage is in line to increase to about 49-50% of total demand in FY '27.

Timeframe: FY '27Direction: Increase

"in FY '27, we are in line to increase this to about 49%, 50%."

operational efficiencynot yet verifiablequantified

For performance wear, the company is targeting capacity utilization upwards of around 60% for the full next financial year.

Timeframe: Next financial yearDirection: Increase

"we are targeting capacity utilization upwards of around 60% for the full year."

export growthnot yet verifiable

Efforts to diversify into non-U.S. markets (EU, U.K., Australia, Canada) to mitigate tariff risk will bear fruit in time.

Timeframe: Long-termDirection: PositiveConfidence: Confident

"we are confident that our efforts will bear fruit in time."

project executionnot yet verifiable

The fabric expansion at Budhni on existing cotton blend lines is expected to gain momentum from Quarter 1 next year.

Timeframe: FY27 Q1Direction: Increase

"it is expected to gain momentum from Quarter 1 next year."

revenue outlookcontradicted

Vardhman Performance Fabrics, focused on performance wear, will start building scale from Quarter 1 of next financial year.

Timeframe: FY27 Q1Direction: Increase

"We will start building scale from Quarter 1 of next financial year."

Outcome check: Revenue YoY averaged -0.4% across 1 later quarter(s).

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

52Neutral

SMA20 -3.6% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 52
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: -1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

VTLdaily · 1Y · AUTO+9.5%
Latest close ₹598.20 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+1.0%
RSI
49
MACD hist
0.69
52W pos
70%
2026-09-04O ₹592.00H ₹604.10L ₹586.70C ₹598.20Vol 2.8L sh
₹472.35₹528.83₹585.31₹641.79₹698.2752H598.202026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 49. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~3.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 49 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 13% off 52W high · 55% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

77
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-1.4%
3M return
-3.6%
6M return
+10.5%
1Y return
+36.9%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
-10
Sector rank
#4
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 2.0% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +3.9% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
leading
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 145.27+1.62%
93111129147165Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 26145
RS vs Nifty 500145

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 49 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

49U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

FAIR VALUE
Valuation16/30
Growth11/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
49

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

49/100 · FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 53.6%.
  • Balance sheet contributes 12/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 1/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 11/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
20.4
PB
1.6
EV/EBITDA
10.3
ROE
6.9%
ROCE
8.6%
FCF Yield
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
+53.6%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
49
Previous: 49
Verdict
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+53.6%
Previous: +53.6%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
49
50
48
48
49
49
49
50
50
49
49
49

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹489.27
-22.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
44.0
Growth-justified Value
₹1,289.05
+53.6% MoS
PEG
1.85

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
68Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Management has 50% delivered/partly-delivered outcomes on 2 checked claims, with 1 adverse claim outcome. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 50th percentile within Textiles. Main check: results consistency is weak at 41/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 65.1%. Key concern: ROE is low at 6.9%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
60 docs text-extracted · 36 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
56th percentile

overall median 67 · Textiles: 50th pctile, median 70 · Large: 32nd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

60 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
50% delivered or partly delivered

2/8 claims checked · 1 contradicted/failed claim

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
52
watch · capital discipline
Results
41
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 65.1%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • 10 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROE is low at 6.9%.
  • 1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
20.40
P/B
1.65
EV/EBITDA
10.27
Market Cap
17322.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
6.86%
ROCE
8.55%
ROA
6.20%
Dividend Y
0.84%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
10.00%
EPS 5Y
11.00%
Revenue 3Y
-1.00%
EPS 3Y
-4.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.18
Interest Coverage
14.91×
Altman Z
5.49
Book Value
363.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
FCF Positive Y
10/5
OCF
1108.00 Cr
EPS TTM
29.31

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
65.08%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
70%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Textiles, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.