Skip to content

Uttam Sugar Mills Limited (UTTAMSUGAR)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Uttam Sugar Mills Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹388.85
+28.60 · +7.94%
Market cap ₹1,124 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:26 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags04 Oct 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

59Neutral

full bull SMA stack · SMA20 +9.9% / mo · RSI overbought · MACD + · near 52W high · sector -4.6pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 78
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -10.2% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

UTTAMSUGARD candles · FIT view+49.3%
Latest close ₹388.85 on 2026-10-21
Bar
+6.6%
RSI
71
MACD hist
8.20
52W pos
94%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹364.70H ₹393.50L ₹353.95C ₹388.85Vol 19.0L sh
₹210.34₹260.28₹310.21₹360.14₹410.0852H₹388.852026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

UTTAMSUGARNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-18%+11%+41%+70%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026UTTAMSUGAR +63.1%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -11.0%Nifty 500 -6.5%
UTTAMSUGAR
+63.1%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+69.6 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-3.0%
₹401
52W range position
94%
₹181.1 - ₹401
ATR (14)
6.0%
₹23.5
Volume vs 20D
2.07x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹34.7 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹255.3 - ₹401
82.8% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
47

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -3.6% · PAT -91.0% YoY

Technical
Neutral
59

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+29.3%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
67

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -4% YoY · PAT -91% YoY · margin compression · +29% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹606.4 Cr-3.6%+29.0%
EBITDA₹26.2 Cr-48.1%-73.4%
Operating margin4.3%-370 bps-1662 bps
PAT₹1.3 Cr-91.0%-97.6%
PAT margin0.2%-210 bps-1143 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
12.80
P/B
1.28
EV/EBITDA
7.27
Market Cap
1124.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
12.00%
ROCE
11.40%
ROA
4.05%
Dividend Y
0.85%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
9.00%
EPS 5Y
9.00%
Revenue 3Y
-11.00%
EPS 3Y
-11.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.82
Interest Coverage
4.56×
Altman Z
2.55
Book Value
230.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
16.99%
FCF Positive Y
2/5
OCF
270.00 Cr
EPS TTM
22.80

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.71%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
64%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 606+29.0% vs prev
0628.8Sep 2023: 604Dec 2023: 518Mar 2024: 465Jun 2024: 454Sep 2024: 401Dec 2024: 425Mar 2025: 567Jun 2025: 629Sep 2025: 582Dec 2025: 521Mar 2026: 470Jun 2026: 606Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1.3-97.6% vs prev
-14.1064.1Sep 2023: 15.6Dec 2023: 43.5Mar 2024: 42.1Jun 2024: 5.8Sep 2024: -14.1Dec 2024: 30.1Mar 2025: 64.1Jun 2025: 14.5Sep 2025: 1.0Dec 2025: 30.4Mar 2026: 54.7Jun 2026: 1.3Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 71. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price > SMA20 > SMA50 > SMA200 — full bullish stack.
  • SMA20 rising (~9.0% over last month) — short-term momentum positive.
  • RSI(14) at 71 — overbought zone; risk of mean reversion.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 3% off 52W high · 115% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

92
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendEstablished S2
1M return
+51.9%
3M return
+63.1%
6M return
+46.9%
1Y return
+53.0%
RS 1D
+3
RS 20D
+32
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
#24
Stage evidence
  • Price is 49.6% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +6.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
19 Aug 2026
S2 age
43 trading sessions
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 163.17+8.95%
6994118143168Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26163
RS vs Nifty 500163

Valuation & peers

U-Score 47 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

47U-SCORE
Financial Turnaround

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation14/30
Growth10/25
Quality3/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
47

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

47/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 17.0%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 29.3%.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 3/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 10/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 14/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
12.8
PB
1.3
EV/EBITDA
7.3
ROE
12.0%
ROCE
11.4%
FCF Yield
17.0%
Debt/Equity
0.8
MoS
+29.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
47
Previous: 47
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+29.3%
Previous: +34.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
56
56
56
49
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹343.5
-13.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
24.1
Growth-justified Value
₹549.48
+29.3% MoS
PEG
1.42

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
RAJRILTD
Small
Raj Rayon Industries Limited
Retail
match 110
47
32.0
29.7%
-7%
FAIR VALUE
PLATIND
Small
Platinum Industries Limited
Retail
match 110
52
22.2
12.7%
+25%
FAIR VALUE
KRISHIVAL
Small
Krishival Foods Limited
Retail
match 109
40
52.3
13.0%
-28%
WATCHLIST
MMP
Small
MMP Industries Limited
Retail
match 109
40
26.7
11.6%
+27%
WATCHLIST
NRAIL
Small
N R Agarwal Industries Limited
Retail
match 108
24
17.0
6.0%
-232%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Uttam Sugar Mills Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
67Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 52nd percentile of the scored universe and 55th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 38/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
25 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
52nd percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 55th pctile, median 66 · Small: 56th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

25 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
38
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 74.7%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 17.8%.

Trust risks

  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 20.2%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Annual report

Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) 24 Aug - Uttam Sugar filed FY2025-26 BRSR as part of its 31st Annual Report.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 16 May - Copy of newspaper publication in respect of Audited Financial Results for the quarter/year ended on 31.03.2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.