IP
IndiaPulse

Trident Limited (TRIDENT)

Large Cap

Textiles stocks · Large cap · NSE

Trident Limited is an integrated home textile manufacturer (Yarn, Bath & Bed Linen) and a producer of Paper, Chemical, and Energy. It is the world's largest wheat straw-based paper manufacturer and a leading integrated home textile manufacturer, with a global presence and 16,000+ workforce.

₹24.16
+0.17 · +0.71%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Textiles P/E 44.4 (n=11)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
33

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
72

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
32

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
48

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 37/100

margin compression · Rev +5% YoY · PAT +13% YoY · +9% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 21 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,787 Cr+4.7%+9.4%
EBITDA₹300 Cr+2.7%+32.2%
Operating margin17.0%+0 bps+300 bps
PAT₹158 Cr+12.9%+54.9%
PAT margin8.8%+64 bps+259 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T18:49:14.964Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 consolidated results show strong sequential recovery with EBITDA up 56% QoQ and PBT up 137% QoQ, driven by improved textile EBIT margins. However, YoY performance declined, with total income down 12.38% and net profit down 23.56%.

While Q4 FY26 saw a significant sequential rebound in profitability, the YoY decline in total income and net profit raises concerns about sustained growth. The textile segment's margin recovery is positive, but the overall revenue contraction needs close monitoring for a robust thesis.

Current business mix

Revenue Split between Segments (FY26)

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 3 reported categories.

Businessmix
Yarn31.0%
Bed & Bath Linen53.0%
Paper16.0%
Growth engines

Developing Differentiated Products

Developing new differentiated and innovative products leveraging consumer sentiments and behavior to earn premium.

Catering to Niche Segments

Catering to luxury, fashion accents, & sports segments.

Domestic and Global Presence

Strong domestic and Global presence (2020-2025 phase).

Digital Transformation

Digital Trident and AI driven projects (Going Forward 2026-2030).

Capacity and execution

Solar Power Capacity

An additional 5.40 MWp rooftop solar capacity installed at Budhni facility, increasing total installed capacity to 57.38 MWp.

Tailwinds

Global Home Textile Market Growth

Global Home Textile Market size projected to reach USD 197.28 billion by 2031 at a 6.31% CAGR.

Indian Home Textile Market Growth

Indian Home Textile Market size expected to grow from USD 11.91 billion in 2026 to USD 16.76 billion by 2031 at a CAGR of 7.08%.

India-UK FTA

India-UK FTA signed in July has eliminated tariffs on textile products, which will boost trade.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

QoQ comparison is crucial to assess sequential momentum and recovery in margins, especially for the textile segment. YoY comparison is necessary to evaluate overall business health and growth against previous year's performance, considering potential seasonality.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Consolidated EBITDA Margin

Improved QoQ, slightly better YoY

Q4 FY26: 15.05% (vs. 9.99% QoQ, 14.02% YoY)

Consolidated PBT Margin

Improved QoQ, slightly lower YoY

Q4 FY26: 8.87% (vs. 3.87% QoQ, 9.12% YoY)

Consolidated Net Profit

Strong QoQ growth, significant YoY decline

Q4 FY26: INR 1,020 Mn (vs. INR 442 Mn QoQ, INR 1,334 Mn YoY)

Exports as % of Income (Standalone)

Stable QoQ, declined YoY

Q4 FY26: 54% (vs. 53% QoQ, 58% YoY)

Management forward view

Cost Optimization Initiatives

Driving company-wide cost optimization initiatives to reduce conversion cost and enhance margins.

Brand Building

Focus on brand building (2020-2025 phase).

Expansion and Diversification

Future plans include expansion and diversification (2026-2030).

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Textile Segment EBIT Margin13.36% in Q4 FY26Sustained improvement and stability above previous year's levels.
Total Income GrowthINR 16,501 Mn in Q4 FY26 (down 12.38% YoY)Reversal of YoY decline and consistent revenue growth.
Net Debt/EBITDA1.05x as on Mar'26Reduction in leverage ratios, especially with increased debt QoQ.
Exports as % of Income54% in Q4 FY26Stability or growth in export contribution, given global market opportunities.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

32Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -2.7% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 19
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: -1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

TRIDENTdaily · 1Y · AUTO+1.3%
Latest close ₹24.16 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.5%
RSI
39
MACD hist
-0.01
52W pos
24%
2026-09-04O ₹24.03H ₹24.59L ₹23.97C ₹24.16Vol 32.9L sh
₹21.71₹23.19₹24.66₹26.13₹27.6152L24.162026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 39.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 39 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 22% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

31
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-4.1%
3M return
-0.2%
6M return
+3.7%
1Y return
-18.7%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
-1
Sector rank
#4
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 3.4% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -0.9%.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 84.04+0.71%
818794100106Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2684
RS vs Nifty 50084

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 33 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

33U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation5/30
Growth6/25
Quality2/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
33

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

33/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 11/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -216.3%.
  • Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 5/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
31.2
PB
2.6
EV/EBITDA
12.1
ROE
7.9%
ROCE
9.8%
FCF Yield
0.7%
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
-216.3%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
33
Previous: 33
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-216.3%
Previous: -216.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +1 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
35
35
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
33

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹12.82
-88.5% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
9.8
Growth-justified Value
₹7.64
-216.3% MoS
PEG
10.40

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
72Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 69th percentile of the scored universe and 67th percentile within Textiles. Main check: results consistency is weak at 48/100.

Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 73.7%. Key concern: ROE is low at 7.9%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
89 docs text-extracted · 23 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
69th percentile

overall median 67 · Textiles: 67th pctile, median 70 · Large: 47th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

89 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
52
watch · capital discipline
Results
48
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 73.7%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 0.7%.
  • 10 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROE is low at 7.9%.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
31.20
P/B
2.59
EV/EBITDA
12.07
Market Cap
12312.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
7.91%
ROCE
9.79%
ROA
5.24%
Dividend Y
2.07%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
8.00%
EPS 5Y
3.00%
Revenue 3Y
2.00%
EPS 3Y
-6.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.38
Interest Coverage
7.76×
Altman Z
4.97
Book Value
9.36

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.68%
FCF Positive Y
10/5
OCF
760.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.78

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
73.68%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
25%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Textiles, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.