Skip to content

Teamo Productions HQ Limited (TPHQ)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Teamo Productions HQ Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹0.45
-0.01 · -2.17%
Market cap ₹53.7 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 07:22 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

23Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -9.3% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -4.6pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 18
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -10.2% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

TPHQD candles · FIT view-21.1%
Latest close ₹0.45 on 2026-10-21
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
38
MACD hist
-0.00
52W pos
11%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹0.45H ₹0.47L ₹0.45C ₹0.45Vol 5.6L sh
₹0.35₹0.46₹0.56₹0.67₹0.7752L₹0.452026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

TPHQNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-19%+12%+42%+72%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026TPHQ +7.1%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -11.0%Nifty 500 -6.5%
TPHQ
+7.1%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+13.6 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-47.7%
₹0.9
52W range position
11%
₹0.4 - ₹0.9
ATR (14)
5.6%
₹0
Volume vs 20D
0.56x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹0.5 - ₹0.6
42.1% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
19

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
100

Revenue +19.1% · PAT +811.3% YoY

Technical
Bearish
23

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
47

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 100/100

Rev +19% YoY · PAT +811% YoY · margin expansion · +122% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹33.7 Cr+19.1%+121.7%
EBITDA₹8.5 Cr+3750.0%+201.8%
Operating margin25.1%+2437 bps+7992 bps
PAT₹6.5 Cr+811.3%NDF
PAT margin19.2%+1670 bps+6029 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
1.44
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
53.70Cr

Profitability

ROE
-0.94%
ROCE
-0.76%
ROA
-12.53%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-4.00%
EPS 5Y
8.00%
Revenue 3Y
71.00%
EPS 3Y
20.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.01
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
6.00
Book Value
0.34

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.06%
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
0.03 Cr
EPS TTM
-0.05

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
26.48%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
24%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 33.7+121.7% vs prev
0145.6Sep 2023: 120Dec 2023: 130Mar 2024: 8.4Jun 2024: 6.7Sep 2024: 146Dec 2024: 19.8Mar 2025: 15.8Jun 2025: 28.3Sep 2025: 51.0Dec 2025: 17.9Mar 2026: 15.2Jun 2026: 33.7Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 6.5+203.7% vs prev
-6.206.5Sep 2023: 0.3Dec 2023: 0.2Mar 2024: 3.5Jun 2024: 1.5Sep 2024: 1.5Dec 2024: 0.5Mar 2025: 0.1Jun 2025: 0.7Sep 2025: 0.5Dec 2025: 5.1Mar 2026: -6.2Jun 2026: 6.5Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 38.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~10.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 48% off 52W high · 12% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

32
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-18.2%
3M return
+7.1%
6M return
-22.4%
1Y return
-31.8%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
-18
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
#24
Stage evidence
  • Price is 10.8% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -1.3% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 71-1.25%
567491109126Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2671
RS vs Nifty 50071

Valuation & peers

U-Score 19 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

19U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation3/30
Growth10/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
19

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

19/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 10/25 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 3/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
—
PB
1.4
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
-0.9%
ROCE
-0.8%
FCF Yield
0.1%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
19
Previous: 19
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
19.6
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
NGIL
Small
Nakoda Group of Industries Limited
Retail
match 108
15
39.6
5.3%
-328%
OVERVALUED
KSR
Small
KSR Footwear Limited
Retail
match 107
12
—
-16.8%
—
OVERVALUED
SEYAIND
Small
Seya Industries Limited
Retail
match 106
14
—
-0.3%
—
OVERVALUED
MOHITIND
Small
Mohit Industries Limited
Retail
match 106
18
—
-1.0%
—
OVERVALUED
PRUDMOULI
Small
Prudential Sugar Corporation Limited
Retail
match 106
51
7.1
5.5%
+77%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Teamo Productions HQ Limited operates in Retail / E-Commerce, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
47Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 4th percentile of the scored universe and 5th percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 19/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
4 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
4th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 5th pctile, median 66 · Small: 5th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

4 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
22
weak · capital discipline
Results
19
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.01.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-37 Cr.
  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Only 0 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 0.4%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 6 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 5 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 28 May

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 15 Jan

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.