Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 28 Sep
Source: Bse
Tiger Logistics (India) Limited (TIGERLOGS)
Small CapServices stocks · Small cap · NSE
Tiger Logistics (India) Limited operates in Shipping, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals18 Oct 2026 · screener
Official result overlay30 Sept 2026 · nse-xbrl
Latest result16 Oct, 08:49 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Services P/E 17.7 (n=143)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
26Bearishfull bear SMA stack · SMA20 -9.4% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Stock trend: 26
Sector RS: —
Services FPI tailwindFlow only
FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but exact sector-index confirmation is unavailable. View sector evidence
Technical chart
TIGERLOGSD candles · FIT view-22.7%Latest close ₹24.95 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-5.5%
RSI
42
MACD hist
0.08
52W pos
9%
2026-10-19O ₹26.40H ₹26.40L ₹24.60C ₹24.95Vol 64,204 sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
TIGERLOGSNifty 500
- TIGERLOGS
- -22.4%
- Nifty 500
- -5.6%
- Vs Nifty 500
- -16.8 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -48.6%
- 52W range position
- 9%
- ATR (14)
- 6.2%
- Volume vs 20D
- 0.58x
- Avg traded value
- ₹0.3 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹22.7 - ₹27.7
₹48.5
₹22.7 - ₹48.5
₹1.5
Latest completed session
20-session average
43.8% annualized volatility
No exact NSE sector index is mapped for this company. Nifty 500 remains the broad-market comparison.
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE50
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Bad2
Revenue +33.4% · PAT -32.1% YoY
Technical
Bearish26
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model+38.6%
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence62
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 30 Sept 2026
Bad · 2/100PAT -32% YoY · margin compression · Rev +33% YoY · +48% QoQ
Filed 16 Oct 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹225.1 Cr | +33.4% | +47.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹6.9 Cr | -38.2% | +309.5% |
| Operating margin | 3.1% | -354 bps | +203 bps |
| PAT | ₹5.9 Cr | -32.1% | +169.6% |
| PAT margin | 2.6% | -251 bps | +123 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 16.60
- P/B
- 1.60
- EV/EBITDA
- 17.15
- Market Cap
- 269.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 14.40%
- ROCE
- 18.00%
- ROA
- 5.57%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 28.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 31.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 10.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -3.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.44
- Interest Coverage
- 3.80×
- Altman Z
- 4.93
- Book Value
- 15.90
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 5/5
- OCF
- -18.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 1.53
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 57.48%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 12%
Financial History
Updated 20/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 301-8.8% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: -12.0-300.0% vs prev
Return on Equity
%Latest: -22.6-349.1% vs prev
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 42. Wait for confirmation.
- Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
- SMA20 falling (~10.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 42 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
- 48% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
12
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-4.5%
3M return
-22.4%
6M return
-24.8%
1Y return
-41.3%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
+3
Sector rank
#12
Industry rank
#40
Stage evidence
- Price is 19.4% below the 30-week proxy.
- The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.4%.
- Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 53.77-0.99%
RS vs Nifty 50054
Valuation & peers
U-Score 50 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 50 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies
FAIR_VALUE
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · FAIR VALUEValuation11/30
Growth19/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet7/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
50
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
50/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE
Positive drivers
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 38.6%.
- Growth contributes 19/25 to the score.
- Balance sheet contributes 7/15 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
- Cash flow is weaker at 3/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Valuation is weaker at 11/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model
Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE
Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
16.6
PB
1.6
EV/EBITDA
17.1
ROE
14.4%
ROCE
18.0%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
+38.6%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
50
Previous: 50
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+38.6%
Previous: +38.6%
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
32
50
50
50
50
Factor attribution
No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
₹23.4
-6.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
26.6
Growth-justified Value
₹40.62
+38.6% MoS
PEG
0.54
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
MAHESHWARI
Small
Maheshwari Logistics Limited
Logistics
match 95
44
13.6
7.5%
+59%
WATCHLIST
SAKUMA
Small
Sakuma Exports Limited
Logistics
match 95
29
22.6
0.6%
-716%
OVERVALUED
LEMERITE
Small
Le Merite Exports Limited
Logistics
match 95
24
89.9
9.3%
-159%
OVERVALUED
ESSARSHPNG
Small
Essar Shipping Limited
Logistics
match 95
47
—
—
+86%
FAIR VALUE
TRANSWORLD
Small
TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES LIMITED
Logistics
match 93
22
—
-10.8%
—
OVERVALUED
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
Tiger Logistics (India) Limited operates in Shipping, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Sept 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
62Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 35th percentile of the scored universe and 36th percentile within Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 30/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
81 docs text-extracted · 20 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
35th percentile
overall median 67 · Services: 36th pctile, median 66 · Small: 40th pctile, median 66
Evidence depth
Financial-only
81 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
39
weak · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 57.5%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 1%.
- ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
Trust risks
- ▸3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸ROCE is low at -8.1%.
- ▸ROE is low at -21%.
- ▸ROCE trend is -34.1%.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching Tiger Logistics (India) Limited
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 4 Sep
Source: Bse
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 2 Sep
Source: Bse
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 14 Aug
Source: Bse
Announcement
Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 14 Aug - Tiger Logistics wins HPCL air cargo contracts worth about ₹8.8 crore, to be executed in one year.
Source: Bse
Annual report
Annual Report 2026
Source: Bse
Annual report
Annual Report 2026
Source: Bse
Annual report
Annual Report 2025
Source: Bse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.