IP
IndiaPulse

Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited (TECHNOE)

Large Cap

Infra stocks · Large cap · NSE

Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited is identified as Engineers & Constructors. The document is a transcript of an investor/analyst presentation for the quarter ended 31 March 2026.

₹979.5
+5.85 · +0.60%
Quote04 Sept, 03:59 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 16.9 (n=83)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
WATCHLIST
39

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
76

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Bearish
39

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
stable
68

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -32% YoY · margin compression · Rev +20% YoY

Filed 11 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹630 Cr+19.8%-37.6%
EBITDA₹100 Cr+8.7%-24.2%
Operating margin16.0%-200 bps+300 bps
PAT₹93 Cr-31.6%-19.1%
PAT margin14.8%-1110 bps+337 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T18:42:48.360Z
Management commentary snapshot

The provided document is a transcript of an investor/analyst presentation for Q4 FY26, but contains no financial results or operational details.

No financial or operational data is available in the provided document to assess the company's performance or investment thesis. The document only provides a cover page and a link to the transcript.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare YOY

No financial or operational data is available in the provided document to determine a suitable comparison basis.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

39Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -1.6% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector +2.3pp vs Nifty (3M)

Stock trend: 25
Sector RS: 61
Sector 3M: +0.8% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

TECHNOEdaily · 1Y · AUTO-14.1%
Latest close ₹979.50 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.5%
RSI
45
MACD hist
-0.57
52W pos
16%
2026-09-04O ₹975.00H ₹983.35L ₹969.30C ₹979.50Vol 82,871 sh
₹919.43₹1.04k₹1.16k₹1.28k₹1.41k979.502026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 45.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~1.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 45 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 37% off 52W high · 13% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

12
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-8.1%
3M return
-1.9%
6M return
-11.5%
1Y return
-32.2%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
-5
Sector rank
#15
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 10.5% below the 30-week proxy without full trend alignment.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.3% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 69.55+0.59%
637689102115Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2670
RS vs Nifty 50070

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 39 · WATCHLIST · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

39U-SCORE
WATCHLIST

Fundamental score breakdown

WATCHLIST
Valuation0/30
Growth20/25
Quality2/20
Balance Sheet10/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
39

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

39/100 · WATCHLIST

Positive drivers

  • Growth contributes 20/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 10/15 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -4.3%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
26.4
PB
2.8
EV/EBITDA
23.4
ROE
11.4%
ROCE
14.8%
FCF Yield
1.0%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
-4.3%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
39
Previous: 39
Verdict
WATCHLIST
Previous: WATCHLIST
Margin of safety
-4.3%
Previous: -4.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
52
53
40
40
40
40
39
39
39
39
39
39

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹545.6
-79.5% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
25.4
Growth-justified Value
₹939.47
-4.3% MoS
PEG
0.92

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
76Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 81st percentile of the scored universe and 85th percentile within Infra. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 56.9%. Key concern: Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-590 Cr.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
44 docs text-extracted · 30 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
81st percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 85th pctile, median 64 · Large: 62nd pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

44 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
62
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
68
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 56.9%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 1%.
  • 9 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-590 Cr.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
26.40
P/B
2.75
EV/EBITDA
23.40
Market Cap
11392.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
11.40%
ROCE
14.80%
ROA
7.26%
Dividend Y
0.71%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
30.00%
EPS 5Y
25.00%
Revenue 3Y
58.00%
EPS 3Y
34.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.02
Interest Coverage
22.33×
Altman Z
5.89
Book Value
357.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.99%
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
-590.00 Cr
EPS TTM
37.06

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
56.93%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
16%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Infra, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.