Skip to content

TCC Concept Limited (TCC)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

TCC Concept Limited operates in Real Estate Services, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹40.46
+2.45 · +6.45%
Market cap ₹1,119 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 05:57 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Aug, 12:34 am IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

39Bearish

SMA20 -4.8% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -5.2pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 35
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -10.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

TCCD candles · FIT view-48.7%
Latest close ₹40.46 on 2026-10-21

Daily history is available from 2026-02-25; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.

Bar
+5.9%
RSI
38
MACD hist
-0.67
52W pos
5%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹38.20H ₹41.11L ₹37.80C ₹40.46Vol 41.7L sh
₹34.59₹47.44₹60.29₹73.14₹85.9952L₹40.462026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

TCCNifty RealtyNifty 500
-38%-23%-9%+6%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026TCC -30.1%Nifty Realty -13.1%Nifty 500 -6.5%
TCC
-30.1%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Realty
-13.1%
Vs Nifty 500
-23.6 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-61.6%
₹105.3
52W range position
5%
₹36.9 - ₹105.3
ATR (14)
9.3%
₹3.7
Volume vs 20D
3.83x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹5.7 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹36.9 - ₹55.2
72.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
63

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Good
72

Revenue +481.8% · PAT +44.4% YoY

Technical
Bearish
39

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+58.5%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
58

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Good · 72/100

Rev +482% YoY · PAT +44% YoY · +52% QoQ · margin compression

Filed 31 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹128 Cr+481.8%+52.4%
EBITDA₹46 Cr+155.6%+64.3%
Operating margin36.0%-4500 bps+300 bps
PAT₹13 Cr+44.4%-58.1%
PAT margin10.2%-3075 bps-2674 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
17.00
P/B
0.68
EV/EBITDA
7.19
Market Cap
1119.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.50%
ROCE
5.65%
ROA
3.23%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
311.24%
EPS 5Y
187.16%
Revenue 3Y
431.00%
EPS 3Y
329.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.18
Interest Coverage
3.94×
Altman Z
3.12
Book Value
69.10

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
113.00 Cr
EPS TTM
2.93

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
45.69%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
8%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 128+52.4% vs prev
0128.0Sep 2023: 28.0Dec 2023: 29.0Mar 2024: 13.0Jun 2024: 12.0Sep 2024: 17.0Dec 2024: 22.0Mar 2025: 32.0Jun 2025: 22.0Sep 2025: 27.0Dec 2025: 46.0Mar 2026: 84.0Jun 2026: 128Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 13.0-58.1% vs prev
031.0Sep 2023: 2.0Dec 2023: 11.0Mar 2024: 5.0Jun 2024: 5.0Sep 2024: 9.0Dec 2024: 10.0Mar 2025: 17.0Jun 2025: 9.0Sep 2025: 10.0Dec 2025: 14.0Mar 2026: 31.0Jun 2026: 13.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend unclear. RSI 38.

  • SMA20 falling (~5.0% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 38 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 62% off 52W high · 10% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

6
RS percentile
Insufficient history
1M return
-12.0%
3M return
-30.1%
6M return
-49.0%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#69
Stage evidence
  • At least 170 daily sessions are required for the trend-stage read.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
unavailable
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
161 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 46.5+7.44%
40567287103Feb 26May 26Aug 26Oct 2647
RS vs Nifty 50047

Valuation & peers

U-Score 63 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

63U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation24/30
Growth24/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
63

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

63/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 58.5%.
  • Growth contributes 24/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 1/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
17.0
PB
0.7
EV/EBITDA
7.2
ROE
5.5%
ROCE
5.7%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.2
MoS
+58.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
63
Previous: 66 (-3)
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+58.5%
Previous: +61.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
63
63
63
66
66

Factor attribution

Valuation
24-3
was 27

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹67.49
+40.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹97.57
+58.5% MoS
PEG
0.07

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
HOMESFY
SME
Homesfy Realty Ltd.
Real Estate
match 147
4
—
-50.3%
—
OVERVALUED
ARIHANT
Small
Arihant Foundations & Housing Limited
Real Estate
match 139
66
14.2
17.1%
+59%
UNDERVALUED
SHRIRAMPPS
Small
Shriram Properties Limited
Real Estate
match 138
50
12.6
6.8%
+63%
FAIR VALUE
SURAJEST
Small
Suraj Estate Developers Limited
Real Estate
match 138
57
10.8
9.4%
+70%
FAIR VALUE
SPMLINFRA
Small
SPML Infra Limited
Real Estate
match 137
54
15.8
8.3%
+59%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

TCC Concept Limited operates in Real Estate Services, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
58Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 22nd percentile of the scored universe and 38th percentile within Real Estate. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 38/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
7 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
22nd percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 38th pctile, median 61 · Small: 25th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

7 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
60
acceptable · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
43
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
38
weak · capital discipline
Results
77
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • ▸Latest 3 quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter holding fell 15.2%.
  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 5.7%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 5.4%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 9 Sep - Newspaper publication for the notice of 41st Annual General Meeting and Remote E-voting information

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 4 Aug - NES Data signs MOU to acquire Hinjewadi land for proposed 60 MW data centre campus.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 3 Jul - Pepcart signs first B2B alliance with Shiprocket for big-box logistics across 7,000+ pin codes.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 11 Jun - Newspaper advertisement pertaining to loss of Share Certificates.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.