Annual reportSep 2026
Sep 2026 · General Updates 31 Aug - 8th AGM scheduled for 26 September 2026; annual report 2025-26 and e-voting details shared.
Source: Nse
Tapi Fruit Processing Ltd. (TAPIFRUIT)
SME CapConsumer stocks · SME cap · NSE
Tapi Fruit Processing Ltd. operates in Fruit Processing, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
₹41.8
+0.00 · +0.00%
Market cap ₹18.7 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm ISTDetails
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result25 May, 07:16 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens
Trend score and candlestick chart
36BearishSMA20 -16.5% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -4.6pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)
Stock trend: 39
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -10.2% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Technical chart
TAPIFRUITD candles · FIT view-27.9%Latest close ₹41.80 on 2026-10-15
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
29
MACD hist
-0.48
52W pos
0%
2026-10-15O ₹41.80H ₹41.80L ₹41.80C ₹41.80Vol 750 sh
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context
Relative performance and chart statistics
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
TAPIFRUITNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
- TAPIFRUIT
- -16.4%
- Nifty 500
- -5.0%
- Nifty Consumer Durables
- -7.8%
- Vs Nifty 500
- -11.4 pp
Chart stats
15 Oct 2026- From 52W high
- -60.1%
- 52W range position
- 0%
- ATR (14)
- 4.3%
- Volume vs 20D
- 0.31x
- Avg traded value
- ₹0 Cr
- 20D price channel
- ₹41.8 - ₹52.2
₹104.8
₹41.8 - ₹104.8
₹1.8
Latest completed session
20-session average
57.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot
What the evidence says now
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.
Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED3
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Latest result
Good55
Revenue +50.8% · PAT NDF YoY
Technical
Bearish36
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Valuation
Legacy model—
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Trust
Limited evidence48
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Financials
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Latest result
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Good · 55/100Rev +51% YoY · margin expansion · +31% QoQ
Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹16.2 Cr | +50.8% | +30.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹1.1 Cr | NDF | +91.5% |
| Operating margin | 7.0% | NDF | +222 bps |
| PAT | ₹-0.7 Cr | NDF | NDF |
| PAT margin | -4.3% | NDF | +374 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- —
- P/B
- 1.78
- EV/EBITDA
- 6.73
- Market Cap
- 18.70Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- -14.90%
- ROCE
- -4.96%
- ROA
- -6.44%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- -10.00%
- EPS 5Y
- -10.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 11.00%
- EPS 3Y
- -37.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 1.07
- Interest Coverage
- 2.49×
- Altman Z
- 2.52
- Book Value
- 24.50
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- —
- FCF Positive Y
- 1/5
- OCF
- -0.37 Cr
- EPS TTM
- -3.91
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 65.72%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 0%
Financial History
Updated 21/10/2026
Revenue
₹ CrLatest: 16.2+30.7% vs prev
Net Profit
₹ CrLatest: -0.7+30.3% vs prev
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Technicals
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 29. Wait for confirmation.
- SMA20 falling (~19.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 29 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
- MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
- Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Nifty 500 leadership
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
4
RS percentile
Insufficient history
1M return
-16.1%
3M return
-39.4%
6M return
-49.8%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
-2
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
#28
Stage evidence
- At least 170 daily sessions are required for the trend-stage read.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
unavailable
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
103 observations
15 Oct 2026Value 44.94-3.69%
RS vs Nifty 50045
Valuation & peers
U-Score 3 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Valuation & peers
U-Score 3 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
OVERVALUED
Fundamental score breakdown
U band · OVERVALUEDValuation5/30
Growth1/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow0/10
Piotroski
1/9 (+0)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
3
Why this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
3/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED
Positive drivers
- Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.
- Valuation contributes 5/30 to the score.
- Growth contributes 1/25 to the score.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
- Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Cash flow is weaker at 0/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model
Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium
Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
—
PB
1.8
EV/EBITDA
6.7
ROE
-14.9%
ROCE
-5.0%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
1.1
MoS
—
Score movement
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
3
Previous: 3
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Factor attribution
No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.
Modelled fair value
Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
3.8
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—
Comparable companies
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
HAVISHA
Small
Sri Havisha Hospitality and Infrastructure Limited
Hospitality
match 82
15
—
-8.7%
—
OVERVALUED
TGBHOTELS
Small
TGB Banquets And Hotels Limited
Hospitality
match 76
43
20.9
2.2%
+41%
WATCHLIST
KHFM
SME
KHFM Hospitality And Facility Management Services Ltd.
Hospitality
match 72
3
27.0
5.5%
-498%
OVERVALUED
SAJHOTELS
SME
Saj Hotels Ltd.
Hospitality
match 71
54
15.8
2.4%
+51%
FAIR VALUE
BLUECOAST
Small
Blue Coast Hotels Limited
Hospitality
match 70
26
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business, management & trust
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Business and thesis
Issuer presentation review pending
Tapi Fruit Processing Ltd. operates in Fruit Processing, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Trust Score
48Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 5th percentile of the scored universe and 7th percentile within Consumer. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 28/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
Relative rank
5th percentile
overall median 67 · Consumer: 7th pctile, median 66 · SME: 5th pctile, median 64
Evidence depth
Financial-only
0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
Claim delivery
Outcome history still building
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Limited evidence · low confidenceWhat it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
28
weak · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
53
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
28
weak · capital discipline
Results
53
watch · quarterly consistency
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 65.7%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
Trust risks
- ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹0 Cr.
- ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
- ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
- ▸Debt/equity is 1.07.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Continue researching Tapi Fruit Processing Ltd.
Important announcements & filings
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026
Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026
Source: Nse
Annual reportMar 2025
Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025
Source: Nse
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.