Skip to content

Superhouse Limited (SUPERHOUSE)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

Superhouse Limited operates in Leather Goods, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹156.95
-1.64 · -1.03%
Market cap ₹173 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:25 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -6.9% / mo · MACD + · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 51
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SUPERHOUSED candles · FIT view+2.2%
Latest close ₹156.95 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-1.9%
RSI
43
MACD hist
0.31
52W pos
47%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹160.00H ₹162.00L ₹154.15C ₹156.95Vol 2,326 sh
₹143.43₹155.37₹167.30₹179.23₹191.1752H₹156.952026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SUPERHOUSENifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-14%-7%-1%+6%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026SUPERHOUSE -9.3%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
SUPERHOUSE
-9.3%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-3.7 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-17.0%
₹189
52W range position
47%
₹128.6 - ₹189
ATR (14)
4.5%
₹7
Volume vs 20D
0.58x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹150 - ₹173
21.8% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
24

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
35

Revenue +0.1% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Neutral
45

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-225.5%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
68

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 35/100

Rev +0% YoY · margin expansion · +5% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹162.9 Cr+0.1%+5.1%
EBITDA₹10.1 Cr+41.6%-20.7%
Operating margin6.2%+181 bps-202 bps
PAT₹3.6 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin2.2%+239 bps+302 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
22.20
P/B
0.37
EV/EBITDA
5.53
Market Cap
173.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-0.08%
ROCE
3.84%
ROA
0.93%
Dividend Y
0.51%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
5.00%
EPS 5Y
-1.00%
Revenue 3Y
-4.00%
EPS 3Y
-13.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.39
Interest Coverage
2.37×
Altman Z
2.17
Book Value
422.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
30.64%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
53.00 Cr
EPS TTM
7.07

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
54.88%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
46%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 677+1.8% vs prev
0766.0Mar 2017: 666Mar 2018: 650Mar 2019: 694Mar 2020: 609Mar 2021: 537Mar 2022: 650Mar 2023: 766Mar 2024: 665Mar 2025: 665Mar 2026: 677FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 4.0-55.6% vs prev
036.0Mar 2017: 8.0Mar 2018: 18.0Mar 2019: 21.0Mar 2020: 26.0Mar 2021: 24.0Mar 2022: 36.0Mar 2023: 30.0Mar 2024: 14.0Mar 2025: 9.0Mar 2026: 4.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 0.9-56.3% vs prev
08.7Mar 2017: 2.8%Mar 2018: 6.0%Mar 2019: 6.5%Mar 2020: 7.4%Mar 2021: 6.3%Mar 2022: 8.7%Mar 2023: 6.8%Mar 2024: 3.1%Mar 2025: 2.0%Mar 2026: 0.9%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 43. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 17% off 52W high · 22% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

59
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-4.9%
3M return
-9.3%
6M return
+2.4%
1Y return
-4.0%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
0
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 0.2% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.8% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 94.62-0.01%
77849198105Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2695
RS vs Nifty 50095

Valuation & peers

U-Score 24 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

24U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation10/30
Growth3/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
24

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

24/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 30.6%.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -225.5%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
22.2
PB
0.4
EV/EBITDA
5.5
ROE
-0.1%
ROCE
3.8%
FCF Yield
30.6%
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
-225.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
24
Previous: 24
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-225.5%
Previous: -225.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
24

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹259.09
+39.4% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
6.8
Growth-justified Value
₹48.22
-225.5% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
BIL
Small
Bhartiya International Limited
Leather Products
match 72
28
56.2
2.9%
-66%
OVERVALUED
SHREYANIND
Small
Shreyans Industries Limited
Retail
match 19
17
—
1.5%
—
OVERVALUED
DTIL
Small
Dhunseri Tea & Industries Limited
FMCG
match 19
17
—
-2.3%
—
OVERVALUED
PILITA
Small
PIL ITALICA LIFESTYLE LIMITED
Consumer Durables
match 19
14
55.8
5.1%
-505%
OVERVALUED
ROSSELLIND
Small
Rossell India Limited
FMCG
match 19
26
13.2
4.5%
-59%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Superhouse Limited operates in Leather Goods, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
68Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 60th percentile within Consumer. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
6 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
56th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 60th pctile, median 66 · Small: 60th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

6 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
73
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
53
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 28.3%.
  • ▸8 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 3.8%.
  • ▸ROE is low at -0.1%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

7 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 3 Sep - Superhouse Limited has informed about copy of Newspaper Publication.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 21 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 21 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 14 Aug - Superhouse Limited has informed to the Exchange about copy of Newspaper

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Aug - Superhouse Limited has informed about copy of news paper publication.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.