Skip to content

Sotac Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (SOTAC)

SME Cap

Pharma stocks · SME cap · NSE

Sotac Pharmaceuticals Ltd. operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹92
+1.95 · +2.17%
Market cap ₹99.5 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals13 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 07:48 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Pharma P/E 33.5 (n=187)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

61Bullish

SMA20 -7.7% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector +4.9pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 35
Sector RS: 100
Sector 3M: -0.7% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Pharma FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SOTACD candles · FIT view-13.2%
Latest close ₹92.00 on 2026-10-21
Bar
+0.0%
RSI
36
MACD hist
-0.87
52W pos
11%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹92.00H ₹92.00L ₹92.00C ₹92.00Vol 1,200 sh
₹84.47₹92.89₹101.31₹109.73₹118.1652L₹92.00VolRSIMACD2026-052026-062026-072026-102026-10
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SOTACNifty PharmaNifty 500
-7%-4%-1%+3%29 Jul13 Aug21 Oct21 Oct 2026SOTAC +1.8%Nifty Pharma -3.1%Nifty 500 -6.5%
SOTAC
+1.8%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Pharma
-3.1%
Vs Nifty 500
+8.3 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-39.6%
₹152.4
52W range position
9%
₹86 - ₹152.4
ATR (14)
3.4%
₹3.2
Volume vs 20D
0.11x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹86 - ₹111.3
44.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
55

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
2

Revenue +15.4% · PAT +0.0% YoY

Technical
Bullish
61

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+60.8%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
65

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 2/100

PAT 0% YoY · margin compression · Rev +15% YoY · +62% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹60 Cr+15.4%+62.2%
EBITDA₹10 CrNDF+150.0%
Operating margin17.0%NDF+700 bps
PAT₹3 Cr+0.0%+50.0%
PAT margin5.0%NDF-41 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
17.50
P/B
1.69
EV/EBITDA
5.98
Market Cap
99.50Cr

Profitability

ROE
10.10%
ROCE
12.50%
ROA
4.51%
Dividend Y
0.22%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
34.00%
Revenue 3Y
9.00%
EPS 3Y
31.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.64
Interest Coverage
4.50×
Altman Z
2.68
Book Value
53.30

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
10.05%
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
17.00 Cr
EPS TTM
5.22

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
72.85%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
7%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 60.0+62.2% vs prev
060.0Sep 2022: 40.0Mar 2023: 38.0Sep 2023: 52.0Mar 2024: 52.0Sep 2024: 53.0Mar 2025: 47.0Sep 2025: 37.0Mar 2026: 60.0Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 3.0+50.0% vs prev
06.0Sep 2022: 2.0Mar 2023: 1.0Sep 2023: 2.0Mar 2024: 3.0Sep 2024: 2.0Mar 2025: 6.0Sep 2025: 2.0Mar 2026: 3.0Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 36. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~8.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 36 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 34% off 52W high · 7% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

18
RS percentile
Insufficient history
1M return
-13.2%
3M return
-34.1%
6M return
-26.4%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
+4
RS 20D
-
Sector rank
#1
Industry rank
#9
Stage evidence
  • At least 170 daily sessions are required for the trend-stage read.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
unavailable
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
81 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 88.6+2.26%
7588101113126Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2689
RS vs Nifty 50089

Valuation & peers

U-Score 55 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

55U-SCORE
Growth at Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation19/30
Growth21/25
Quality3/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
55

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

55/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 10.1%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 60.8%.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 3/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 5/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
17.5
PB
1.7
EV/EBITDA
6.0
ROE
10.1%
ROCE
12.5%
FCF Yield
10.1%
Debt/Equity
0.6
MoS
+60.8%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
55
Previous: 55
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+60.8%
Previous: +61.7%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹79.12
-16.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
45.0
Growth-justified Value
₹234.9
+60.8% MoS
PEG
0.53

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
ZENITHDRUG
SME
Zenith Drugs Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 164
75
6.9
26.3%
+84%
DEEP VALUE
ARISTO
SME
Aristo Bio-Tech and Lifescience Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 162
77
8.5
17.6%
+81%
DEEP VALUE
ONYX
SME
Onyx Biotec Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 161
15
—
-0.4%
—
OVERVALUED
JFLLIFE
SME
JFL Life Sciences Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 160
69
5.0
15.0%
+89%
UNDERVALUED
CURIS
SME
Curis Lifesciences Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 160
33
30.0
—
+57%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Sotac Pharmaceuticals Ltd. operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
65Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 45th percentile of the scored universe and 33rd percentile within Pharma. Main check: results consistency is weak at 43/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
45th percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 33rd pctile, median 70 · SME: 56th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
43
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 72.9%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 10.1%.
  • ▸3/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 18%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

4 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Copy of Newspaper Publication 8 Sep - 11th AGM notice published; AGM on September 30, 2026, with annual report and e-voting details.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · General Updates 8 Sep - 11th AGM on September 30, 2026; annual report link and e-voting schedule shared.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.