Sonu Infratech Ltd. (SONUINFRA)
SME CapIT stocks · SME cap · NSE
Sonu Infratech Ltd. operates in Infrastructure Tech, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Investable fundamentals, management trust is acceptable, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is mixed.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026
Bad · 0/100Rev -1% YoY · PAT -13% YoY · margin compression · +183% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹90.1 Cr | -0.9% | +182.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹8.8 Cr | -4.9% | +23.1% |
| Operating margin | 9.8% | -41 bps | -1264 bps |
| PAT | ₹4.6 Cr | -12.6% | +54.5% |
| PAT margin | 5.1% | -68 bps | -422 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
Sonu Infratech Ltd. operates in Infrastructure Tech, within the IT sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
48NeutralSMA20 -9.4% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Technical chart
SONUINFRAdaily · 1Y · AUTO-33.2%Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 64. Wait for confirmation.
- Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
- SMA20 falling (~10.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 64 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
- 60% off 52W high · 33% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 71 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 71 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
UNDERVALUEDWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 13.4%.
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 88.2%.
Main drags
- Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
- Cash flow is weaker at 5/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk
Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -2 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 45th percentile of the scored universe and 40th percentile within IT. Main check: results consistency is weak at 55/100.
Healthy Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: Promoter holding fell 1.7%.
Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.
overall median 67 · IT: 40th pctile, median 69 · SME: 56th pctile, median 64
3 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Mixed Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is 13.4%.
Trust risks
- ▸Promoter holding fell 1.7%.
- ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 4.01
- P/B
- 0.65
- EV/EBITDA
- 2.81
- Market Cap
- 52.30Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 18.60%
- ROCE
- 19.10%
- ROA
- 7.78%
- Dividend Y
- —
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 14.12%
- EPS 5Y
- 18.18%
- Revenue 3Y
- 1.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 1.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.57
- Interest Coverage
- 4.83×
- Altman Z
- 2.85
- Book Value
- 68.70
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 13.38%
- FCF Positive Y
- 1/5
- OCF
- 13.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 11.08
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 52.70%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 14%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in IT, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in IT — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.