Skip to content

Shri Krishna Devcon Limited (SHRIKRISH)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

Shri Krishna Devcon Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹33.05
-1.24 · -3.62%
Market cap ₹95.3 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 05:50 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 05:50 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 07:26 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

40Neutral

SMA20 -8.1% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -6.4pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 38
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -12.0% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SHRIKRISHD candles · FIT view-22.4%
Latest close ₹33.05 on 2026-10-19

Daily history is available from 2026-04-20; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.

Bar
-9.5%
RSI
43
MACD hist
-0.04
52W pos
4%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹36.50H ₹36.50L ₹33.00C ₹33.05Vol 39 sh
₹30.94₹37.50₹44.06₹50.63₹57.1952H52L₹33.052026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SHRIKRISHNifty RealtyNifty 500
-22%-11%-1%+10%20 Jul2 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026SHRIKRISH -17.6%Nifty Realty -11.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
SHRIKRISH
-17.6%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Realty
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-12.1 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-41.0%
₹56
52W range position
4%
₹32.1 - ₹56
ATR (14)
8.5%
₹2.8
Volume vs 20D
0.03x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹32.1 - ₹40
68.8% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
9

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -20.7% · PAT -35.2% YoY

Technical
Neutral
40

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-85.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
52

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -21% YoY · PAT -35% YoY · margin expansion

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹3.8 Cr-20.7%-37.7%
EBITDA₹2.1 Cr-13.8%-0.9%
Operating margin55.5%+444 bps+2057 bps
PAT₹0.9 Cr-35.2%-19.3%
PAT margin24.0%-538 bps+545 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
23.50
P/B
1.04
EV/EBITDA
16.75
Market Cap
95.30Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.13%
ROCE
6.70%
ROA
1.91%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
1.00%
EPS 5Y
5.00%
Revenue 3Y
-12.00%
EPS 3Y
-2.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.50
Interest Coverage
2.60×
Altman Z
1.27
Book Value
32.60

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
-4.56 Cr
EPS TTM
1.45

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
54.88%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
24%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 21.0-21.9% vs prev
032.8Mar 2017: 22.1Mar 2018: 32.8Mar 2019: 17.0Mar 2020: 16.9Mar 2021: 20.0Mar 2022: 20.1Mar 2023: 31.3Mar 2024: 25.4Mar 2025: 26.9Mar 2026: 21.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 4.6-7.3% vs prev
04.9Mar 2017: 2.0Mar 2018: 3.0Mar 2019: 1.9Mar 2020: 1.2Mar 2021: 3.5Mar 2022: 2.8Mar 2023: 4.8Mar 2024: 4.5Mar 2025: 4.9Mar 2026: 4.6FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 5.0-12.0% vs prev
06.2Mar 2017: 3.3%Mar 2018: 4.7%Mar 2019: 3.0%Mar 2020: 1.8%Mar 2021: 5.1%Mar 2022: 3.8%Mar 2023: 6.2%Mar 2024: 5.5%Mar 2025: 5.7%Mar 2026: 5.0%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 43. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~8.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

-
RS percentile
Insufficient history
1M return
-2.8%
3M return
-16.1%
6M return
-
1Y return
-
RS 1D
-
RS 20D
-
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#71
Stage evidence
  • At least 170 daily sessions are required for the trend-stage read.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
unavailable
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
120 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 80.48-2.63%
77879610511520 Apr19 Jun18 Aug19 Oct80
RS vs Nifty 50080

Valuation & peers

U-Score 9 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

9U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation3/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
9

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

9/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 5/25 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 1.3, in distress territory.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -85.0%.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
23.5
PB
1.0
EV/EBITDA
16.8
ROE
5.1%
ROCE
6.7%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.5
MoS
-85.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
9
Previous: 9
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-85.0%
Previous: -85.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
9
9
9
9

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹32.61
-1.3% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
12.3
Growth-justified Value
₹17.86
-85.0% MoS
PEG
4.70

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
PARSVNATH
Small
Parsvnath Developers Limited
Real Estate
match 176
10
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
LPDC
Small
Landmark Property Development Company Limited
Real Estate
match 175
58
9.8
3.7%
+71%
FAIR VALUE
TICL
Small
Twamev Construction and Infrastructure Limited
Real Estate
match 174
40
18.0
2.3%
+48%
WATCHLIST
SADBHIN
Small
Sadbhav Infrastructure Project Limited
Real Estate
match 174
29
1.1
—
-48%
OVERVALUED
USK
Small
Udayshivakumar Infra Limited
Real Estate
match 173
35
8.7
1.0%
-454%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Shri Krishna Devcon Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
52Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 10th percentile of the scored universe and 22nd percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 31/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
10th percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 22nd pctile, median 61 · Small: 12th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
55
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
31
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-5 Cr.
  • ▸Altman Z is 1.35.
  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 6.7%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Annual reportSep 2026

Sep 2026 · Intimation Under Regulation 30 (LODR) - Submission Of Letters Being Sent To Shareholders. 6 Sep - 32nd AGM on Sep 29, 2026; annual report shared, KYC reminder issued, special demat window till Feb 4, 2027.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 7 Sep - Newspaper announcement with respect to 32nd annual general meeting, e-voting facilities, cut-off date and book closure.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 4 Sep - Newspaper announcement with respect to information regarding a) 32nd Annual General Meeting and b) Special window for transfer & dematerialisation of physical shares.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.