Skip to content

Shalimar Paints Limited (SHALPAINTS)

Small Cap

Industrials stocks · Small cap · NSE

Shalimar Paints Limited operates in Defence / Aerospace, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹81.68
+0.81 · +1.00%
Market cap ₹629 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result04 Sept, 09:07 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Industrials P/E 26.2 (n=537)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 -4.2% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 55
Sector RS: 50
Sector 3M: -6.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SHALPAINTSD candles · FIT view+63.0%
Latest close ₹81.68 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+2.5%
RSI
55
MACD hist
0.52
52W pos
77%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹79.65H ₹82.90L ₹79.15C ₹81.68Vol 1.1L sh
₹44.55₹58.01₹71.48₹84.94₹98.4052H₹81.682026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SHALPAINTSNifty India ManufacturingNifty 500
-14%+11%+37%+62%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026SHALPAINTS +39.0%Nifty India Manufactu… -5.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
SHALPAINTS
+39.0%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty India Manufacturing
-5.8%
Vs Nifty 500
+44.5 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-14.9%
₹96
52W range position
77%
₹35.2 - ₹96
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹4.1
Volume vs 20D
1.04x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.8 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹71.2 - ₹84
43.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
16

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -11.0% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Neutral
53

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
52

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -11% YoY · margin compression

Filed 04 Sept 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹138 Cr-11.0%-11.5%
EBITDA₹-12 Cr-50.0%-700.0%
Operating margin-9.0%-410 bps-1030 bps
PAT₹-21 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-15.2%-425 bps-1073 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
2.51
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
629.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
-21.40%
ROCE
-7.93%
ROA
-10.76%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
12.00%
EPS 5Y
-5.00%
Revenue 3Y
6.00%
EPS 3Y
-31.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.66
Interest Coverage
-1.12×
Altman Z
2.35
Book Value
30.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
3.50%
FCF Positive Y
6/5
OCF
23.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-8.29

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.96%
Promoter Pledge
70.50%
Momentum 52W
65%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 138-11.5% vs prev
0178.0Sep 2023: 119Dec 2023: 146Mar 2024: 144Jun 2024: 128Sep 2024: 145Dec 2024: 148Mar 2025: 178Jun 2025: 155Sep 2025: 134Dec 2025: 131Mar 2026: 156Jun 2026: 138Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -21.0-200.0% vs prev
-27.00Sep 2023: -26.0Dec 2023: -12.0Mar 2024: -26.0Jun 2024: -27.0Sep 2024: -20.0Dec 2024: -25.0Mar 2025: -10.0Jun 2025: -17.0Sep 2025: -14.0Dec 2025: -27.0Mar 2026: -7.0Jun 2026: -21.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 55. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~4.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 55 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 15% off 52W high · 132% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

84
RS percentile
Stage 2 UptrendEstablished S2
1M return
+1.0%
3M return
+39.0%
6M return
+56.4%
1Y return
+5.6%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#2
Industry rank
#6
Stage evidence
  • Price is 30.6% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +5.9%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price above
200-DMA
price above
S2 entered
05 Aug 2026
S2 age
52 trading sessions
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 110.49+2.05%
496784101119Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26110
RS vs Nifty 500110

Valuation & peers

U-Score 16 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

16U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth4/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet3/15
Cash Flow6/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
16

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

16/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 3.5%.
  • Cash flow contributes 6/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 3/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Promoter pledge is 70.5%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 2/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
—
PB
2.5
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
-21.4%
ROCE
-7.9%
FCF Yield
3.5%
Debt/Equity
0.7
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
16
Previous: 16
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
5.1
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Industrials — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SHAHALLOYS
Small
Shah Alloys Limited
Defence / Aerospace
match 158
43
23.6
-55.5%
+58%
WATCHLIST
VAISHALI
Small
Vaishali Pharma Limited
Defence / Aerospace
match 155
24
24.2
6.0%
+44%
OVERVALUED
KAUSHALYA
Small
Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited
Defence / Aerospace
match 154
14
—
0.4%
—
OVERVALUED
UNIMECH
Small
Unimech Aerospace and Manufacturing Limited
Defence / Aerospace
match 145
28
130.0
8.0%
-202%
OVERVALUED
MTARTECH
Micro
Mtar Technologies Limited
Defence / Aerospace
match 139
32
175.0
12.4%
-321%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Shalimar Paints Limited operates in Defence / Aerospace, within the Industrials sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
52Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 10th percentile of the scored universe and 8th percentile within Industrials. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 22/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
60 docs text-extracted · 12 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
10th percentile

overall median 67 · Industrials: 8th pctile, median 68 · Small: 12th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

60 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
43
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
65
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
22
weak · capital discipline
Results
43
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 75%.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 3.1%.
  • ▸6 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoters have pledged 70.5% of holding.
  • ▸ROCE is low at -7.9%.
  • ▸ROE is low at -21.4%.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -13.9%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Meeting Updates 11 Sep - EGM approved preferential issues, CCPS issuance, and QIP up to Rs. 1,000 crore.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 19 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Preferential Issue 13 Aug - Aug 12 board approved Q1 results, appointed CFO, and proposed ₹1,000 crore QIP and large preferential fundraise.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.