Skip to content

SEL Manufacturing Company Limited (SELMC)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

SEL Manufacturing Company Limited operates in Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹22.6
-0.05 · -0.22%
Market cap ₹79 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result06 Aug, 06:24 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage11/14 · 79%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -2.7% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

SELMCD candles · FIT view-29.5%
Latest close ₹22.60 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+0.8%
RSI
27
MACD hist
-0.56
52W pos
5%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹22.42H ₹23.00L ₹21.52C ₹22.60Vol 18,898 sh
₹20.86₹24.49₹28.13₹31.76₹35.3952L₹22.602026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-082026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

SELMCNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-24%-14%-4%+5%20 Jul18 Aug19 Oct19 Oct 2026SELMC -21.3%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
SELMC
-21.3%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-15.7 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-47.9%
₹43.4
52W range position
5%
₹21.5 - ₹43.4
ATR (14)
7.6%
₹1.7
Volume vs 20D
0.57x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹21.5 - ₹31.9
48.7% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
17

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -50.0% · PAT NDF YoY

Technical
Bearish
27

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
54

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -50% YoY · margin compression · +50% QoQ

Filed 06 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹3 Cr-50.0%+50.0%
EBITDA₹-2 Cr-100.0%+0.0%
Operating margin-62.0%-4900 bps+800 bps
PAT₹-42 CrNDFNDF
PAT margin-1400.0%-71667 bps+70000 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
—
EV/EBITDA
13.47
Market Cap
79.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
—
ROCE
-13.90%
ROA
-19.67%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-39.00%
EPS 5Y
5.00%
Revenue 3Y
-70.00%
EPS 3Y
6.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.00
Interest Coverage
-0.07×
Altman Z
-0.68
Book Value
-121.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
98.73%
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
78.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-50.96

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
75.00%
Promoter Pledge
36.00%
Momentum 52W
0%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 374-32.5% vs prev
03628Mar 2014: 3,628Mar 2015: 2,860Mar 2016: 2,462Mar 2017: 1,261Mar 2018: 603Mar 2019: 347Mar 2020: 189Mar 2021: 420Mar 2022: 554Mar 2023: 374FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -186-42.0% vs prev
-252802507Mar 2014: -294Mar 2015: -149Mar 2016: -370Mar 2017: -573Mar 2018: -2,528Mar 2019: -372Mar 2020: -587Mar 2021: 2,507Mar 2022: -131Mar 2023: -186FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23

Return on Equity

%
Latest: -126-153.3% vs prev
-481.50602.6Mar 2014: -24.5%Mar 2015: -14.6%Mar 2016: -57.3%Mar 2017: -482%Mar 2021: 603%Mar 2022: -49.6%Mar 2023: -126%FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 27.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.7% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 27 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 48% off 52W high · 5% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

27
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-19.3%
3M return
-24.5%
6M return
-19.5%
1Y return
-22.9%
RS 1D
+2
RS 20D
-14
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#36
Stage evidence
  • Price is 22.7% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
241 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 79.52-1.21%
7693111128145Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2680
RS vs Nifty 50080

Valuation & peers

U-Score 17 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

17U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth7/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow9/10
Piotroski
6/9 (+3)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
17

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

17/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 98.7%.
  • Cash flow contributes 9/10 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 7/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is -0.7, in distress territory.
  • Promoter pledge is 36.0%.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
—
PB
—
EV/EBITDA
13.5
ROE
—
ROCE
-13.9%
FCF Yield
98.7%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
—
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
17
Previous: 17
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
12.3
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
RELCHEMQ
Small
Reliance Chemotex Industries Limited
Textiles
match 93
22
15.3
3.5%
-240%
OVERVALUED
BONLON
Small
Bonlon Industries Limited
Textiles
match 92
22
23.9
2.9%
-74%
OVERVALUED
LOYALTEX
Small
Loyal Textile Mills Limited
Textiles
match 91
9
—
-25.8%
—
OVERVALUED
DAMODARIND
Small
Damodar Industries Limited
Textiles
match 89
50
11.0
2.4%
+67%
FAIR VALUE
SHIVAMILLS
Small
Shiva Mills Limited
Textiles
match 89
32
14.5
-0.8%
-255%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

SEL Manufacturing Company Limited operates in Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
54Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 13th percentile of the scored universe and 16th percentile within Consumer. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 30/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
13th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 16th pctile, median 66 · Small: 15th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
43
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
62
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
33
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 75%.
  • ▸FCF yield is 57.1%.
  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.00.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoters have pledged 36% of holding.
  • ▸Altman Z is 0.11.
  • ▸ROCE is low at -15.1%.
  • ▸ROE is low at -452%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

3 shown
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Resignation of Director 8 Aug - Dharminder Pal resigned as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director effective 7 August 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 8 Aug - Mr. Dharminder Pal resigned as Non-Executive Non-Independent Director effective 7 August 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.