Skip to content

RSWM Limited (RSWM)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

RSWM Limited operates in Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹187.52
-7.51 · -3.85%
Market cap ₹956 Cr
ThemesTextiles
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result05 Aug, 10:34 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

38Bearish

SMA20 -2.3% / mo · MACD − · sector -4.6pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 43
Sector RS: 31
Sector 3M: -10.2% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RSWMD candles · FIT view+16.4%
Latest close ₹187.52 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-4.2%
RSI
35
MACD hist
-1.47
52W pos
57%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹195.77H ₹199.15L ₹185.13C ₹187.52Vol 21,370 sh
₹141.65₹166.89₹192.12₹217.35₹242.5952H₹187.522026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RSWMNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-15%-6%+3%+12%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026RSWM -12.7%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -11.0%Nifty 500 -6.5%
RSWM
-12.7%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-6.2 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-21.2%
₹238
52W range position
57%
₹120 - ₹238
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹9.3
Volume vs 20D
0.35x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.9 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹185.1 - ₹234.9
33.2% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
59

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
40

Revenue -0.8% · PAT +150.0% YoY

Technical
Bearish
38

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+58.1%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
65

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 40/100

Rev -1% YoY · PAT +150% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 05 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹1,161 Cr-0.8%+1.7%
EBITDA₹90 Cr+23.3%+28.6%
Operating margin8.0%+200 bps+200 bps
PAT₹20 Cr+150.0%-41.2%
PAT margin1.7%+104 bps-126 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
13.30
P/B
0.70
EV/EBITDA
5.81
Market Cap
956.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
3.83%
ROCE
5.62%
ROA
1.74%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
14.00%
EPS 5Y
57.00%
Revenue 3Y
6.00%
EPS 3Y
-20.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.24
Interest Coverage
2.41×
Altman Z
2.43
Book Value
289.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
22.80%
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
435.00 Cr
EPS TTM
13.44

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
55.69%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
69%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 1,161+1.7% vs prev
01256Sep 2023: 1,007Dec 2023: 977Mar 2024: 1,171Jun 2024: 1,208Sep 2024: 1,166Dec 2024: 1,196Mar 2025: 1,256Jun 2025: 1,170Sep 2025: 1,151Dec 2025: 1,091Mar 2026: 1,142Jun 2026: 1,161Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 20.0-41.2% vs prev
-34.0036.0Sep 2023: -9.0Dec 2023: -34.0Mar 2024: 36.0Jun 2024: -15.0Sep 2024: -18.0Dec 2024: -9.0Mar 2025: 1.0Jun 2025: 8.0Sep 2025: 7.0Dec 2025: 2.0Mar 2026: 34.0Jun 2026: 20.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 35.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~2.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 35 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 21% off 52W high · 56% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

79
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-19.0%
3M return
-12.7%
6M return
+19.4%
1Y return
+22.2%
RS 1D
-1
RS 20D
-10
Sector rank
#8
Industry rank
#33
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 0.1% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +4.6% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 132.09-2.95%
83102121140159Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26132
RS vs Nifty 500132

Valuation & peers

U-Score 59 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

59U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation23/30
Growth19/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet6/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
59

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

59/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 22.8%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 58.1%.
  • Cash flow contributes 8/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 6/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 19/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
13.3
PB
0.7
EV/EBITDA
5.8
ROE
3.8%
ROCE
5.6%
FCF Yield
22.8%
Debt/Equity
1.2
MoS
+58.1%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE. Debt/equity is 1.2, so downturn resilience matters.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
59
Previous: 59
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+58.1%
Previous: +56.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹295.62
+36.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹447.55
+58.1% MoS
PEG
0.23

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
UNITEDPOLY
Small
United Polyfab Gujarat Limited
Textiles
match 91
45
40.9
21.1%
-35%
WATCHLIST
SARLAPOLY
Small
Sarla Performance Fibers Limited
Textiles
match 91
47
9.6
14.4%
-514%
FAIR VALUE
PRECOT
Small
Precot Limited
Textiles
match 90
38
14.2
7.7%
-64%
WATCHLIST
BORANA
Small
Borana Weaves Limited
Textiles
match 89
84
10.5
34.5%
+73%
DEEP VALUE
SWARAJ
SME
Swaraj Suiting Ltd.
Textiles
match 87
65
15.9
21.7%
+60%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

RSWM Limited operates in Textiles, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
65Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 45th percentile of the scored universe and 48th percentile within Consumer. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
99 docs text-extracted · 37 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
45th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 48th pctile, median 66 · Small: 50th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

99 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
53
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
44
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 55.7%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 21%.
  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.24.
  • ▸ROCE is low at 5.6%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 3.8%.
  • ▸0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Investor presentationAug 2026

Aug 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Press Release / Media Release 11 Aug - RSWM partners NDS9 for 74:26 JV, investing about INR 186 crore in a green garment facility.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Credit Rating 9 Jun - India Ratings affirmed RSWM issuer rating at IND A/Stable and assigned bank facilities ratings.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.