Skip to content

RSD Finance Limited (RSDFIN)

Small Cap

Financial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE

RSD Finance Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹83.53
-1.47 · -1.73%
Market cap ₹125 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 04:50 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 04:50 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result11 Aug, 08:23 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 17.0 (n=243)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

40Neutral

SMA20 -9.2% / mo · MACD − · near 52W low

Stock trend: 35
Sector RS: 47
Sector 3M: -5.4% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RSDFIND candles · FIT view-0.6%
Latest close ₹83.97 on 2026-10-19

Daily history is available from 2026-04-20; the requested 1Y window is partially covered.

Bar
+1.0%
RSI
39
MACD hist
-0.33
52W pos
18%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹83.12H ₹87.69L ₹81.05C ₹83.97Vol 599 sh
₹60.46₹88.75₹117.04₹145.33₹173.6252H52L₹83.972026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-092026-10
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RSDFINNifty Financial ServicesNifty 500
-22%+15%+53%+91%20 Jul31 Aug19 Oct19 Oct 2026RSDFIN -5.0%Nifty Financial Servi… -6.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RSDFIN
-5.0%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Financial Services
-6.0%
Vs Nifty 500
+0.6 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-50.2%
₹168.5
52W range position
18%
₹65.6 - ₹168.5
ATR (14)
6.3%
₹5.3
Volume vs 20D
1.35x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹81.1 - ₹99.2
44.4% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
50

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +2.2% · PAT -10.8% YoY

Technical
Neutral
40

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+72.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
70

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -11% YoY · Rev +2% YoY · +110% QoQ

Filed 11 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹11.7 Cr+2.2%+110.0%
EBITDANDFNDFNDF
Operating marginNDFNDFNDF
PAT₹7 Cr-10.8%NDF
PAT margin59.6%-871 bps+11878 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
9.92
P/B
0.56
EV/EBITDA
63.50
Market Cap
125.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.96%
ROCE
8.02%
ROA
5.62%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-7.00%
EPS 5Y
13.00%
Revenue 3Y
-27.00%
EPS 3Y
5.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.01
Interest Coverage
—
Altman Z
3.00
Book Value
169.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
20.80%
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
7.00 Cr
EPS TTM
9.73

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
74.98%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
28%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 11.7+110.0% vs prev
036.7Sep 2023: 18.9Dec 2023: 28.1Mar 2024: 30.7Jun 2024: 32.5Sep 2024: 29.4Dec 2024: 31.3Mar 2025: 36.7Jun 2025: 11.5Sep 2025: 6.3Dec 2025: 14.3Mar 2026: 5.6Jun 2026: 11.7Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 7.0+311.8% vs prev
-3.308.2Sep 2023: 2.5Dec 2023: 5.3Mar 2024: 6.4Jun 2024: 7.0Sep 2024: 5.6Dec 2024: 4.4Mar 2025: 0.9Jun 2025: 7.8Sep 2025: 2.8Dec 2025: 8.2Mar 2026: -3.3Jun 2026: 7.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend unclear. RSI 39.

  • SMA20 falling (~10.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 39 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 50% off 52W high · 28% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

-
RS percentile
Insufficient history
1M return
-9.8%
3M return
+5.0%
6M return
-
1Y return
-
RS 1D
-
RS 20D
-
Sector rank
#10
Industry rank
#47
Stage evidence
  • At least 170 daily sessions are required for the trend-stage read.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
unavailable
Sector
weakening
Industry
weakening
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
117 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 103.15+1.16%
8411013616218820 Apr19 Jun18 Aug19 Oct103
RS vs Nifty 500103

Valuation & peers

U-Score 50 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

50U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation27/30
Growth9/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet11/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
50

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

50/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 20.8%.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 72.0%.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 9/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
9.9
PB
0.6
EV/EBITDA
63.5
ROE
6.0%
ROCE
8.0%
FCF Yield
20.8%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+72.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
50
Previous: 50
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+72.0%
Previous: +72.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹192.35
+56.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
30.6
Growth-justified Value
₹297.74
+72.0% MoS
PEG
1.01

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SONAL
Small
Sonal Mercantile Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 159
43
6.5
6.9%
+80%
WATCHLIST
MAHAPEXLTD
Small
Maha Rashtra Apex Corporation Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 156
16
52.1
0.4%
-3024%
OVERVALUED
MYMUDRA
SME
My Mudra Fincorp Ltd.
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 152
64
9.4
20.2%
+63%
UNDERVALUED
TFL
Small
Transwarranty Finance Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 152
8
—
-9.3%
—
OVERVALUED
NAGREEKCAP
Small
Nagreeka Capital & Infrastructure Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 151
68
4.5
29.8%
+83%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

RSD Finance Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
70Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 63rd percentile of the scored universe and 75th percentile within Financial Services. Main check: results consistency is weak at 15/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
3 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
63rd percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 75th pctile, median 62 · Small: 65th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

3 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
52
watch · capital discipline
Results
15
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 75%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 20.8%.
  • ▸5 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROE is low at 6%.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 13 Aug - Newspaper Publication for the quarter ended 30.06.2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 27 May - Newspaper Publication for the Audited Financial Result for the fourth quarter and year ended 31.03.2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Financial Results For The FY Ended 31.03.2026 25 May

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.