Skip to content

R&B Denims Limited (RNBDENIMS)

Small Cap

Consumer stocks · Small cap · NSE

R&B Denims Limited operates in Denim, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹7.84
-0.38 · -4.62%
Market cap ₹243 Cr
ThemesTextiles
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result14 Aug, 04:58 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

27Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -8.4% / mo · RSI oversold · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 22
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RNBDENIMSD candles · FIT view-41.4%
Latest close ₹7.84 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-0.3%
RSI
28
MACD hist
-0.08
52W pos
0%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹7.86H ₹8.12L ₹7.81C ₹7.84Vol 4.6L sh
₹6.60₹12.76₹18.91₹25.07₹31.2352L₹7.842026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RNBDENIMSNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-23%-8%+7%+22%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RNBDENIMS -18.2%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RNBDENIMS
-18.2%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
-12.7 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-88.4%
₹67.7
52W range position
0%
₹7.7 - ₹67.7
ATR (14)
5.4%
₹0.4
Volume vs 20D
4.17x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹7.8 - ₹9.4
28.1% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
60

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue +16.3% · PAT -46.8% YoY

Technical
Bearish
27

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+69.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
69

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

PAT -47% YoY · margin compression · Rev +16% YoY

Filed 14 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹119.3 Cr+16.3%-13.3%
EBITDA₹8.7 Cr-22.9%+43.8%
Operating margin7.3%-370 bps+289 bps
PAT₹4.4 Cr-46.8%+291.1%
PAT margin3.7%-435 bps+286 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
11.60
P/B
1.21
EV/EBITDA
5.66
Market Cap
243.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
9.90%
ROCE
11.40%
ROA
5.90%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
21.00%
EPS 5Y
18.00%
Revenue 3Y
21.00%
EPS 3Y
13.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.37
Interest Coverage
5.43×
Altman Z
3.56
Book Value
7.41

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
5/5
OCF
9.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.77

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
57.38%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
2%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 119-13.3% vs prev
0137.7Sep 2023: 66.4Dec 2023: 108Mar 2024: 123Jun 2024: 78.4Sep 2024: 93.3Dec 2024: 95.3Mar 2025: 99.8Jun 2025: 103Sep 2025: 113Dec 2025: 113Mar 2026: 138Jun 2026: 119Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 4.4+291.1% vs prev
010.1Sep 2023: 3.6Dec 2023: 5.9Mar 2024: 7.4Jun 2024: 5.1Sep 2024: 4.6Dec 2024: 10.1Mar 2025: 7.6Jun 2025: 8.2Sep 2025: 7.1Dec 2025: 8.3Mar 2026: 1.1Jun 2026: 4.4Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 28.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~9.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 28 — oversold zone; bounce conditions.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

2
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-12.5%
3M return
-18.2%
6M return
-47.1%
1Y return
-82.2%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
0
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
#36
Stage evidence
  • Price is 33.3% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -30.7%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
neutral
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 20.7-3.63%
125292133173Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2621
RS vs Nifty 50021

Valuation & peers

U-Score 60 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

60U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation26/30
Growth17/25
Quality1/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-2
Raw sum
60

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

60/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 69.4%.
  • Valuation contributes 26/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 2 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 1/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 4/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
11.6
PB
1.2
EV/EBITDA
5.7
ROE
9.9%
ROCE
11.4%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
0.4
MoS
+69.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
60
Previous: 60
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+69.4%
Previous: +69.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
59
60
60
60
60

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹11.33
+30.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
33.3
Growth-justified Value
₹25.64
+69.4% MoS
PEG
0.73

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
NDL
Small
Nandan Denim Limited
Textiles
match 88
71
10.2
5.2%
+70%
UNDERVALUED
SOMATEX
Small
Soma Textiles & Industries Limited
Textiles
match 63
31
60.8
-2.1%
+30%
OVERVALUED
VIPCLOTHNG
Small
VIP Clothing Limited
Textiles
match 63
54
19.2
5.2%
+48%
FAIR VALUE
BASML
Small
Bannari Amman Spinning Mills Limited
Textiles
match 63
54
7.5
1.3%
+77%
FAIR VALUE
MARALOVER
Small
Maral Overseas Limited
Textiles
match 63
25
10.5
3.8%
-343%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

R&B Denims Limited operates in Denim, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
69Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 59th percentile of the scored universe and 63rd percentile within Consumer. Main check: results consistency is weak at 39/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
10 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
59th percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 63rd pctile, median 66 · Small: 63rd pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

10 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
89
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
39
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 57.4%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸5 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸ROCE trend is -3.9%.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Annual report

Reg. 34 (1) Annual Report. 15 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementJun 2026

Jun 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 15 Aug - The Newspaper Advertisement regarding Financial Results for quarter ended June 30, 2026

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
AnnouncementMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 30 May - Please enclosed herewith newspaper publication of extract of standalone and consolidated audited financial results for quarter and year ended on march 31, 2026.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Annual Report For Financial Year 2025-26 14 Jul

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.