Skip to content

RKEC Projects Limited (RKEC)

Small Cap

Real Estate stocks · Small cap · NSE

RKEC Projects Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹19.53
-0.30 · -1.51%
Market cap ₹53.8 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Aug, 01:41 am IST
Score20 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage12/14 · 86%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Real Estate P/E 22.2 (n=72)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

32Bearish

full bear SMA stack · MACD − · near 52W low · sector -6.4pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 25
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -12.0% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest FPI flow is positive, but a second consecutive positive fortnight is still required. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RKECD candles · FIT view-47.9%
Latest close ₹19.53 on 2026-10-19
Bar
+2.2%
RSI
42
MACD hist
-0.10
52W pos
4%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹19.11H ₹19.99L ₹18.86C ₹19.53Vol 9,287 sh
₹16.28₹22.44₹28.60₹34.75₹40.9152L₹19.532026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RKECNifty RealtyNifty 500
-35%-20%-6%+9%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RKEC -25.7%Nifty Realty -11.0%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RKEC
-25.7%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Realty
-11.0%
Vs Nifty 500
-20.1 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-72.6%
₹71.3
52W range position
4%
₹17.4 - ₹71.3
ATR (14)
8.4%
₹1.6
Volume vs 20D
0.10x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹17.4 - ₹27.4
85.3% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Verify management risk first
Do not let cheap valuation override weak Trust or governance evidence.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
3

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -77.6% · PAT -666.7% YoY

Technical
Bearish
32

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
—

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
32

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -78% YoY · PAT -667% YoY · margin compression

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹17 Cr-77.6%-57.5%
EBITDA₹-19 Cr-272.7%+56.8%
Operating margin-109.0%-12400 bps+0 bps
PAT₹-17 Cr-666.7%NDF
PAT margin-100.0%-10395 bps+250 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
—
P/B
0.35
EV/EBITDA
—
Market Cap
53.80Cr

Profitability

ROE
-19.40%
ROCE
-5.53%
ROA
-9.96%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
-3.00%
EPS 5Y
-23.00%
Revenue 3Y
-16.00%
EPS 3Y
-36.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.40
Interest Coverage
-1.96×
Altman Z
0.48
Book Value
58.70

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
-30.00 Cr
EPS TTM
-21.44

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
57.74%
Promoter Pledge
75.20%
Momentum 52W
6%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 180-57.3% vs prev
0422.0Mar 2017: 197Mar 2018: 240Mar 2019: 226Mar 2020: 304Mar 2021: 208Mar 2022: 211Mar 2023: 300Mar 2024: 350Mar 2025: 422Mar 2026: 180FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: -35.0-275.0% vs prev
-35.0029.0Mar 2017: 13.0Mar 2018: 20.0Mar 2019: 22.0Mar 2020: 29.0Mar 2021: 13.0Mar 2022: 7.0Mar 2023: 12.0Mar 2024: 20.0Mar 2025: 20.0Mar 2026: -35.0FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: -20.7-295.7% vs prev
-20.7036.1Mar 2017: 36.1%Mar 2018: 26.7%Mar 2019: 23.4%Mar 2020: 24.8%Mar 2021: 10.0%Mar 2022: 5.1%Mar 2023: 8.1%Mar 2024: 11.8%Mar 2025: 10.6%Mar 2026: -20.7%FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Neutral

Trend is undirectional — long-term trend down. RSI 42.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
  • RSI(14) at 42 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 73% off 52W high · 12% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

2
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
+7.7%
3M return
-25.7%
6M return
-49.2%
1Y return
-70.8%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
0
Sector rank
#18
Industry rank
#71
Stage evidence
  • Price is 30.1% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -8.6%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 26.4-0.49%
20416283104Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2626
RS vs Nifty 50026

Valuation & peers

U-Score 3 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

3U-SCORE
Distress Watch

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation5/30
Growth2/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet0/15
Cash Flow3/10
Piotroski
1/9 (+0)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
3

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

3/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Cash flow contributes 3/10 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 5/30 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 2/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Altman Z is 0.5, in distress territory.
  • Promoter pledge is 75.2%.
  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
Sector valuation model

Real estate valuation: NAV, pre-sales, debt, and inventory quality

Real estate valuation depends more on project economics and balance sheet than simple PE.

Real Estate NAV
Primary lens
NAV and market cap versus project pipeline and pre-sales.
Secondary checks
Inventory age, net debt, collections, execution record.
Main risk check
Book value can overstate value if inventory is slow or debt is high.
PE
—
PB
0.3
EV/EBITDA
—
ROE
-19.4%
ROCE
-5.5%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
1.4
MoS
—
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
3
Previous: 3
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
—
No stored baseline yet

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
—
Growth-justified P/E
2.1
Growth-justified Value
—
— MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Real Estate — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
ANSALAPI
Small
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited
Real Estate
match 175
41
19.4
—
+95%
WATCHLIST
MADHUCON
Small
Madhucon Projects Limited
Real Estate
match 175
8
—
—
—
OVERVALUED
SEMAC
Small
Semac Construction Limited
Real Estate
match 173
44
11.2
9.2%
+38%
WATCHLIST
KRIDHANINF
Small
Kridhan Infra Limited
Real Estate
match 172
27
29.7
—
+27%
OVERVALUED
SADBHIN
Small
Sadbhav Infrastructure Project Limited
Real Estate
match 171
29
1.1
—
-48%
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

RKEC Projects Limited operates in Real Estate Development, within the Real Estate sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
32Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 1st percentile of the scored universe and 1st percentile within Real Estate. Main check: results consistency is weak at 5/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
4 docs text-extracted · 3 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
1st percentile

overall median 67 · Real Estate: 1st pctile, median 61 · Small: 1st pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

4 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Do not rely on management narrative unless hard turnaround evidence is visible.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
25
weak · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
52
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
35
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
30
weak · capital discipline
Results
5
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 57.7%.
  • ▸4 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoters have pledged 75.2% of holding.
  • ▸Promoter holding fell 9.1%.
  • ▸Operating cash flow is negative at ₹-30 Cr.
  • ▸Altman Z is 0.49.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Annual reportMar 2026

Annual report · RKEC Projects Limited has informed the Exchange regarding 'Annual Report'.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual report

Annual report · RKEC Projects Limited has informed the Exchange regarding 'RKEC Annual Report 2026'.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Credit ratingMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Defaults on Payment of Interest/Principal 30 March 2026 - Default on loans: principal Rs26.71 crore and interest Rs1.41 crore; outstanding debt Rs194.29 crore as of 30 Mar 2026.

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Credit ratingMar 2026

Credit-rating report · RKEC Projects Limited has informed the Exchange about Credit Rating- Revision

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Credit rating

Credit-rating report · RKEC Projects Limited has informed the Exchange about Credit Rating

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.