Skip to content

Rachana Infrastructure Ltd. (RILINFRA)

SME Cap

Infra stocks · SME cap · NSE

Rachana Infrastructure Ltd. operates in Infrastructure, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹32
-0.60 · -1.84%
Market cap ₹59.2 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 04:45 am IST
Base fundamentals02 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result01 Jun, 07:57 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Infra P/E 15.4 (n=87)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

30Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -4.9% / mo · MACD + · sector -2.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 27
Sector RS: 35
Sector 3M: -8.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

RILINFRAD candles · FIT view-6.2%
Latest close ₹32.00 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-3.0%
RSI
43
MACD hist
0.08
52W pos
22%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹33.00H ₹33.00L ₹31.60C ₹32.00Vol 2,200 sh
₹29.34₹34.09₹38.85₹43.61₹48.3752H₹32.00VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

RILINFRANifty InfraNifty 500
-19%-10%-2%+6%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026RILINFRA -15.8%Nifty Infra -8.2%Nifty 500 -5.6%
RILINFRA
-15.8%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Infra
-8.2%
Vs Nifty 500
-10.2 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-32.6%
₹47.5
52W range position
22%
₹27.6 - ₹47.5
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹1.6
Volume vs 20D
0.28x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹31.2 - ₹36.9
35.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
73

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
100

Revenue +38.5% · PAT +200.0% YoY

Technical
Bearish
30

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+74.5%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
82

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Excellent · 100/100

Rev +38% YoY · PAT +200% YoY · margin expansion · +88% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹90 Cr+38.5%+87.5%
EBITDA₹15 CrNDF+400.0%
Operating margin17.0%NDF+1100 bps
PAT₹9 Cr+200.0%+800.0%
PAT margin10.0%NDF+792 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
5.70
P/B
0.55
EV/EBITDA
3.26
Market Cap
59.20Cr

Profitability

ROE
10.10%
ROCE
17.80%
ROA
7.94%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
6.00%
EPS 5Y
22.00%
Revenue 3Y
29.00%
EPS 3Y
68.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.06
Interest Coverage
3.17×
Altman Z
4.86
Book Value
58.10

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
20.27%
FCF Positive Y
7/5
OCF
10.00 Cr
EPS TTM
5.44

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
68.32%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
21%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 90.0+87.5% vs prev
090.0Sep 2021: 24.0Mar 2022: 39.0Sep 2022: 25.0Mar 2023: 39.0Sep 2023: 27.0Mar 2024: 65.0Sep 2024: 30.0Mar 2025: 64.0Sep 2025: 48.0Mar 2026: 90.0Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 9.0+800.0% vs prev
09.0Sep 2021: 1.0Mar 2022: 1.0Sep 2022: 1.0Mar 2023: 2.0Sep 2023: 1.0Mar 2024: 3.0Sep 2024: 0.0Mar 2025: 4.0Sep 2025: 1.0Mar 2026: 9.0Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 43.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~5.2% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 43 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • 33% off 52W high · 16% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

45
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-1.4%
3M return
-15.8%
6M return
-6.8%
1Y return
-12.3%
RS 1D
0
RS 20D
+10
Sector rank
#16
Industry rank
#70
Stage evidence
  • Price is 10.3% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -0.6%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
lagging
Industry
lagging
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 96.7-0.82%
8294107119131Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2697
RS vs Nifty 50097

Valuation & peers

U-Score 73 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

73U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation30/30
Growth19/25
Quality5/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-8
Raw sum
73

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

73/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 20.3%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 74.5%.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 8 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 5/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 19/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Execution business valuation: EV/EBITDA plus order and working-capital risk

Capital-intensive execution stories need cash-flow and balance-sheet checks alongside valuation.

Execution EV/EBITDA
Primary lens
EV/EBITDA and PE against execution quality and margin stability.
Secondary checks
Order book, receivables, working capital, debt, operating cash flow.
Main risk check
Order wins matter only if they convert into cash and margins.
PE
5.7
PB
0.6
EV/EBITDA
3.3
ROE
10.1%
ROCE
17.8%
FCF Yield
20.3%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+74.5%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
73
Previous: 73
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+74.5%
Previous: +74.5%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹84.33
+62.1% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
23.1
Growth-justified Value
₹125.66
+74.5% MoS
PEG
0.16

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Infra — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
MANAV
SME
Manav Infra Projects Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 92
68
12.5
40.3%
+45%
UNDERVALUED
K2INFRA
SME
K2 Infragen Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 92
56
4.0
16.0%
+83%
FAIR VALUE
MAYASHEEL
SME
Mayasheel Ventures Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 91
78
4.4
35.4%
+73%
DEEP VALUE
VLINFRA
SME
V.L.Infraprojects Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 90
67
4.5
18.3%
+80%
UNDERVALUED
INTEGRITY
SME
Integrity Infrabuild Developers Ltd.
Construction & Engineering
match 88
63
12.6
41.8%
+45%
UNDERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Rachana Infrastructure Ltd. operates in Infrastructure, within the Infra sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
82Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 94th percentile of the scored universe and 96th percentile within Infra. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
94th percentile

overall median 67 · Infra: 96th pctile, median 64 · SME: 99th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
90
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
88
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
76
strong · capital discipline
Results
60
acceptable · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 68.3%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸Promoter holding increased 3.2%.
  • ▸FCF yield is 18.4%.

Trust risks

  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

2 shown
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.