IP
IndiaPulse

Pranik Logistics Ltd. (PRANIK)

SME Cap

Services stocks · SME cap · NSE

Pranik Logistics is a B2B logistics company offering transportation and warehousing services. It operates with a mix of owned (150+ vehicles) and contractual (600+ vehicles) fleet, managing 17 lakh sq ft of leased warehousing space and 40+ hubs across multiple states including the Northeast.

₹47.85
+7.95 · +19.92%
Quote04 Sept, 03:50 pm IST
Fundamentals22 Aug 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Services P/E 17.5 (n=141)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Investable fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The four lenses are not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
UNDERVALUED
71

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Healthy Trust
76

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
45

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
consistent
80

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 42/100

margin compression · Rev +28% YoY · PAT +6% YoY · +10% QoQ

Filed 30 Jun 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹50.3 Cr+28.5%+10.1%
EBITDA₹4.6 Cr+27.1%+1.3%
Operating margin9.2%-10 bps-80 bps
PAT₹2 Cr+5.7%+0.5%
PAT margin4.0%-88 bps-39 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-08-21T08:14:14.747Z
Management commentary snapshot

FY26 revenue grew 51% YoY to 161 crores, but PAT increased minimally by 9% to 7.03 crores. This was attributed to a significant rise in depreciation (4.97 cr vs 2.80 cr) and increased expenses for capacity building. EPS grew from 5.85 to 6.39.

While revenue growth is strong, the disproportionately low PAT growth and declining EBITDA margins are concerning. Management's explanation for higher depreciation and B2B pricing pressure is noted. The significant increase in debtor days, despite management's claim of 90 days, suggests working capital strain. The 500 crore revenue target by 2030 requires sustained high growth.

Current business mix

Revenue by Vehicle Sourcing

Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 2 reported categories.

Businessmix
Owned Vehicles25.0%
Market Hired Vehicles75.0%
Growth engines

Capacity Building & Expansion

Company is preparing for further expansions and capacity building for more growth in different states, enhancing ground team and manpower.

Warehousing & Hub Network Growth

Warehousing capacity increased to 17 lakh sq ft and operating 40 hubs, including new hubs with Flipkart and expansion into Northeast and Jharkhand.

Manpower Providing Services

Added manpower providing as an add-on service to existing logistics, targeting ~5% margin, not a new business line.

Capacity and execution

Vehicle Fleet Additions

Purchased few vehicles in H2 FY26, leading to higher depreciation. Planning more fleet additions if a long-term leasing deal is finalized.

Warehousing & Hub Expansion

Grew warehousing capacity to 17 lakh sq ft and operating 40 hubs. Started operations in Northeast (Guwahati, Itanagar) and parts of Jharkhand.

Tailwinds

Fuel Price Pass-Through

Contracts clearly mention compensation for fuel price increases (e.g., every 3 rupees increase), resulting in zero impact on the company.

Expected Economic Boost in West Bengal

Expect more industries to come into West Bengal, giving a kick start and more ahead to running in terms of logistics services.

Headwinds

B2B Pricing Pressure

In B2B, with increased volumetric business, there is negotiation on price, meaning a 50% rise in revenue does not mean a 50% rise in PAT.

Weather Disruptions

Weather disruptions and flooding in West Bengal impacted Q3 FY26 turnover.

Risk radar

Increasing Debtor Days

Analyst calculates debtor days at 125 for FY26 (up from 106 in FY25), despite management's claim of 90 days, indicating potential working capital strain.

Declining Profitability

EBITDA margins declined from 11% to 9% YoY, and PAT growth is minimal despite significant revenue growth, partly due to B2B pricing and capacity expenses.

High Depreciation Impact

Depreciation rose significantly due to WDV method and new vehicle purchases, directly impacting reported PAT. Company is considering changing accounting policies.

Increased Debt Levels

Debt levels have increased due to asset purchases (vehicles) and working capital requirements, though management states assets increased in greater proportion.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is essential for assessing annual financial performance and growth trends. QoQ is relevant for understanding sequential momentum, especially regarding debtor days and the impact of seasonal factors like Q3 weather disruptions.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Revenue (FY26)

Total revenue stood at 161 crores, compared to 106 crores in the previous financial year.

PAT (FY26)

PAT was 7.03 crores, compared to 6.44 crores in the previous financial year.

Depreciation (FY26)

Depreciation rose to 4.97 crores, compared to 2.80 crores in the previous financial year, impacting PAT.

Owned Vehicle Utilization

Overall utilization of the 150 owned vehicles is close to 98.7%.

Management forward view

No Equity Raise Planned

Not planning to raise any equity as of now. Debt increase is due to asset purchases and CC limit collateral.

Targeting 500 Crore Top Line by 2030

The 500 crore top line target for 2030 stands intact, with the company aggressively working towards it and growing roughly 50% annually.

Considering Depreciation Policy Change

Company is planning to look into changing accounting policies for depreciation to level up disparity and provide better clarity.

Positive Growth Outlook

With the start of the year, management sees a very positive further growth, expecting to grow in a similar manner as last year.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Debtor DaysAnalyst calculated 125 days (FY26), management claims 90 days.Stabilization or reduction towards management's stated 90-day mark. Any further increase would signal worsening working capital management.
EBITDA Margin9% (FY26) down from 11% (FY25).Reversal of the declining trend and expansion as scale increases, or further compression due to B2B pricing pressures.
Depreciation Policy ChangeCompany is planning to look into changing accounting policies.Announcement and implementation of a new depreciation policy and its impact on reported PAT and financial clarity.
Revenue Growth towards 2030 TargetFY26 revenue 161 crores, target 500 crores by 2030.Sustained annual growth of ~50% to meet the stated 500 crore top line target by 2030.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -9.5% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 41
Sector RS: 51
Sector 3M: -1.2% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

PRANIKdaily · 1Y · AUTO-1.6%
Latest close ₹47.85 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+15.4%
RSI
59
MACD hist
0.60
52W pos
22%
2026-09-04O ₹41.45H ₹47.85L ₹41.45C ₹47.85Vol 43,200 sh
₹35.79₹42.45₹49.10₹55.76₹62.4152L47.852026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 59. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~10.5% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 59 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 45% off 52W high · 29% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 71 · UNDERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

71U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

UNDERVALUED
Valuation28/30
Growth21/25
Quality9/20
Balance Sheet9/15
Cash Flow6/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
71

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

71/100 · UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 71.9%.
  • Valuation contributes 28/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 9/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Balance sheet is weaker at 9/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
6.5
PB
1.0
EV/EBITDA
4.3
ROE
17.0%
ROCE
17.1%
FCF Yield
2.2%
Debt/Equity
1.0
MoS
+71.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
71
Previous: 71
Verdict
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+71.9%
Previous: +71.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -2 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
71

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹77.19
+38.0% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
26.3
Growth-justified Value
₹170.36
+71.9% MoS
PEG
0.06

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
76Healthy Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 81st percentile of the scored universe and 88th percentile within Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 58/100.

High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 73.8%. Key concern: ROCE trend is -6.2%.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
6 docs text-extracted · 4 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Healthy Trust

Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.

Relative rank
81st percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 88th pctile, median 66 · SME: 96th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

6 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Healthy Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Can support position sizing if valuation and trend also agree.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
81
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
58
watch · capital discipline
Results
80
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter holding is 73.8%.
  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • FCF yield is positive at 2.2%.
  • 4 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ROCE trend is -6.2%.
  • 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
6.47
P/B
1.03
EV/EBITDA
4.25
Market Cap
46.20Cr

Profitability

ROE
17.00%
ROCE
17.10%
ROA
7.29%
Dividend Y

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
51.00%
EPS 5Y
108.00%
Revenue 3Y
38.00%
EPS 3Y
96.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.96
Interest Coverage
5.33×
Altman Z
3.54
Book Value
40.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
2.16%
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
17.00 Cr
EPS TTM
6.49

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
73.76%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Services, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.