IP
IndiaPulse

PCBL Chemical Limited (PCBL)

Large Cap

Chemicals stocks · Large cap · NSE

PCBL Chemical Limited manufactures carbon black, a key ingredient for the tyre and non-tyre industries, and operates a specialty chemicals business (Aquapharm) focusing on water solutions, home care, and oil & gas. The company is also diversifying into battery chemicals through its Nanovace platform.

₹317
+2.75 · +0.88%
Quote04 Sept, 03:58 pm IST
Fundamentals05 Sept 2026 · screener
Score05 Sept, 10:20 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags15 Aug 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Chemicals P/E 34.2 (n=45)
Data confidence
Fresh enough for analysis
Investor decision lenses

One read, four checks

75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.

Weak fundamentals, management trust needs verification, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
OVERVALUED
28

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Trust
Mixed Trust
58

low confidence · 0/0 claims checked

Technical
Neutral
53

Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.

Result consistency
weak
35

Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 100/100

Rev +17% YoY · PAT +65% YoY · margin expansion · +20% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 29 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹2,473 Cr+17.0%+19.7%
EBITDA₹396 Cr+24.1%+63.0%
Operating margin16.0%+100 bps+400 bps
PAT₹155 Cr+64.9%+287.5%
PAT margin6.3%+182 bps+433 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Business & thesis

Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary

Business and thesis

Where growth can come from, and what can break the case

Thesis under stressReviewed 2026-06-03T18:23:30.168Z
Management commentary snapshot

Q4 FY26 Carbon Black Volumes Up YoY, But Margins Pressured by West Asia Conflict & Input Costs; Aquapharm Faces Headwinds.

The company navigated significant Q4 FY26 headwinds from the West Asia conflict, crude volatility, and logistics costs, impacting margins and Aquapharm's performance. However, management highlights clear recovery signals, including US tariff rationalization, India-EU FTA, customer restocking, and cost initiatives, projecting double-digit EBITDA growth for FY27.

Growth engines

Specialty Carbon Black

Specialty sales volumes grew by 26% YoY to 19,386 tons in Q4 FY26. Management is selectively increasing focus and resource reallocation in this segment.

Battery Chemicals (Nanovace)

Pilot plant at Palej is fully equipped and ready for commissioning within weeks. Engagement with large battery manufacturers is underway to validate product properties.

Export Market Expansion

India-EU FTA opens duty-free access to 1.8 million tons carbon black market. Recent U.S. tariff reduction restores cost advantage for Indian exports, seeing good traction from US customers.

Cost Reduction Initiatives

Program is progressing well, on track to unlock over INR 200-250 crores of savings over the next 4-6 quarters through yield improvement, throughput enhancement, and feedstock diversification.

Capacity and execution

Carbon Black Capacity

Added 90,000 tons of carbon black capacity (Brownfield expansion at Tamil Nadu), bringing total installed capacity to 880,000 tons per annum.

Superconductive Specialty Black Line

1,000 MTPA line at Palej, Gujarat, is mechanically ready for commissioning, but delayed due to gas shortage.

Specialty Black Line (Mudra)

20,000 tons line in Mudra is ready and will be commissioned in the next few weeks.

Aquapharm Capacity

Successfully expanded capacity from 130,000 tons to 167,000 tons during the year.

Tailwinds

Industry Recovery Signals

Broad industry dynamics show clear signs of recovery; spreads appear to have found a floor, and exit quarter momentum has turned positive.

Favorable Trade Policies

Recent rationalization of U.S. tariffs restored a meaningful cost advantage for Indian exports. India-EU FTA opens duty-free access to a significant carbon black market.

Customer Inventory Restocking

Customers are shifting from just-in-time to a 'just-in-case' approach, building strategic inventory buffers, which is translating into incremental demand.

Indian Tyre Sector Growth

The Indian tyre sector in FY27 is poised for robust, high single-digit growth, supported by high vehicle usage and aging commercial vehicle fleet.

Headwinds

West Asia Conflict Impact

Escalation of West Asia conflict created significant disruptions, massive increases in logistics cost, cost of feedstock, and availability of ships.

Raw Material Price Volatility

Raw material prices (linked to crude) rose sharply; Brent started at $60, ended March at $100, and is hovering close to $120 per barrel.

Contractual Lag Effect

Formula-based contracts with tyre majors carry an inherent quarterly lag effect, meaning the full impact of cost pass-through will reflect in Q2 FY27.

Aquapharm Raw Material & Logistics

Aquapharm faced 25-30% rise in raw material prices (yellow phosphorus, acrylic acid, malic acid), increased lead times, and freight rates due to West Asia conflict.

Risk radar

Geopolitical Instability

Ongoing West Asia conflict continues to pose risks to global supply chains, logistics, and raw material costs, impacting profitability.

Crude Price Volatility

Raw material prices are directly linked to crude, and continued high volatility can exert significant pressure on margins.

Domestic Overcapacity

Surplus domestic capacity in the carbon black industry persisted through Q4 FY26, potentially limiting pricing power.

New Product Qualification

Battery chemicals (Nanovace) require a validation period of a few months post-commissioning before capacity ramp-up begins.

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Management accountability

What management said, and what results must prove

Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.

Analyst reading lens
Compare BOTH

YoY comparison is relevant for assessing overall growth and the impact of annual trends. QoQ is crucial for understanding sequential momentum, especially given the stated lag effect of cost pass-through in contracts and the expected recovery consolidation over the next 2-3 quarters.

Sector KPIs management disclosed

Carbon Black Sales Volume (Q4 FY26)

Consolidated sales volume increased by 8% YoY to 161,865 MT. Domestic sales volume grew by 21% YoY to 105,055 tons, while international sales volume decreased by 10% to 56,800 tons.

Carbon Black Sales Volume (FY26)

Sales volume for carbon black decreased 4% YoY to 618,956 metric tons in FY26 (vs 596,262 metric tons in FY25).

Consolidated EBITDA (Q4 FY26)

Consolidated EBITDA were INR 248 crores.

Consolidated EBITDA (FY26)

Consolidated EBITDA for FY26 stood at INR 1,081 crores as against INR 1,384 crores in FY25.

Management forward view

FY27 Outlook & Growth

Confident of delivering double-digit EBITDA growth in FY27, fueled by volume momentum, leaner cost structure, and better pricing realization.

Capital Allocation

Maintaining capital discipline with investment priorities towards specialty carbon black, battery chemicals, and other value-added segments.

Aquapharm Profitability Target

Goal remains to reach INR 75 crores per quarter EBITDA run rate for Aquapharm over the next 2-3 quarters.

Long-Term EBITDA Guidance

The long-term fundamentals remain intact, and the INR 40 billion EBITDA guidance by 2030 remains on track.

Thesis monitor

Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings

CheckpointCurrent evidenceWhat to verify next
Carbon Black EBITDA per tonQ4 FY26 EBITDA per ton not explicitly stated, but management noted it did not improve much QoQ.Strong double-digit increase in EBITDA per ton for FY27, driven by pricing, product mix, and cost initiatives.
Aquapharm Quarterly EBITDAINR 29 crores in Q4 FY26.Achievement of INR 75 crores per quarter EBITDA run rate within the next 2-3 quarters.
Nanovace (Battery Chemicals) ProgressPilot plant ready for commissioning; product validation with large battery manufacturers underway.Successful product qualification and commencement of commercial volumes, expected in FY28.
Cost Savings RealizationProgram progressing well.Realization of INR 200-250 crores of savings over the next 4-6 quarters from yield, throughput, and feedstock diversification.

Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.

Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

53Neutral

SMA20 -1.8% / mo · MACD −

Stock trend: 49
Sector RS: 57
Sector 3M: +0.0% vs Nifty -1.5%

Technical chart

PCBLdaily · 1Y · AUTO+11.6%
Latest close ₹317.00 on 2026-09-04
Bar
+0.4%
RSI
48
MACD hist
-0.82
52W pos
45%
2026-09-04O ₹315.70H ₹318.40L ₹315.15C ₹317.00Vol 6.2L sh
₹219.13₹259.69₹300.25₹340.81₹381.3852L317.002026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-032026-042026-062026-072026-09
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 48.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~1.8% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 48 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
  • 26% off 52W high · 40% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

46
RS percentile
Stage 2 Uptrend
1M return
-1.5%
3M return
+11.7%
6M return
+16.5%
1Y return
-18.8%
RS 1D
+3
RS 20D
+10
Sector rank
#11
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is 6.6% above the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is above the 30-week proxy and its slope is rising +2.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are positive.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
264 observations
04 Sept 2026Value 79.81+0.88%
63738494105Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Sept 2680
RS vs Nifty 50080

Valuation & score drivers

U-Score 28 · OVERVALUED · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor

28U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

OVERVALUED
Valuation2/30
Growth8/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet5/15
Cash Flow10/10
Piotroski
5/9 (+3)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
28

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

28/100 · OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 7.2%.
  • Cash flow contributes 10/10 to the score.
  • Balance sheet contributes 5/15 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -953.9%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Valuation is weaker at 2/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
47.1
PB
3.1
EV/EBITDA
11.6
ROE
5.6%
ROCE
7.8%
FCF Yield
7.2%
Debt/Equity
1.3
MoS
-953.9%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE. Debt/equity is 1.3, so downturn resilience matters.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
28
Previous: 28
Verdict
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-953.9%
Previous: -953.9%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

05 Sept 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
30
30
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹123.45
-156.8% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
4.5
Growth-justified Value
₹30.08
-953.9% MoS
PEG

Trust score

Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth

Trust Score
58Mixed Trust · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Mixed Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 23rd percentile of the scored universe and 13th percentile within Chemicals. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 18/100.

Mixed Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero. Key concern: 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
76 docs text-extracted · 14 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Mixed Trust

Usable, but needs evidence. Treat guidance with a margin of safety.

Relative rank
23rd percentile

overall median 67 · Chemicals: 13th pctile, median 73 · Large: 13th pctile, median 73

Evidence depth
Financial-only

76 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Mixed Trust · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
82
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
53
watch · leverage and solvency
Discipline
18
weak · capital discipline
Results
35
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • Promoter pledge is zero.
  • Promoter holding increased 2%.
  • FCF yield is 7.2%.
  • 8 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • 3 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • Debt/equity is 1.25.
  • ROCE is low at 7.8%.
  • ROE is low at 5.6%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Financials

Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
47.10
P/B
3.11
EV/EBITDA
11.62
Market Cap
12473.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
5.56%
ROCE
7.75%
ROA
2.29%
Dividend Y
1.89%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
25.00%
EPS 5Y
-7.00%
Revenue 3Y
12.00%
EPS 3Y
-21.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.25
Interest Coverage
2.78×
Altman Z
2.73
Book Value
102.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
7.22%
FCF Positive Y
8/5
OCF
1576.00 Cr
EPS TTM
6.64

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
53.38%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
46%

Financial History

Updated 5/9/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
No data

Net Profit

₹ Cr
No data

Return on Equity

%
No data

Peers

Business-comparable names in Chemicals, ranked by similarity

Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.