Skip to content

Parin Enterprises Ltd. (PARIN)

SME Cap

Consumer stocks · SME cap · NSE

Parin Enterprises Ltd. operates in Trading, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹696.35
+1.45 · +0.21%
Market cap ₹774 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals20 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result17 Oct, 03:33 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 05:22 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Consumer P/E 22.2 (n=441)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

45Neutral

SMA20 -1.1% / mo · MACD − · sector -3.7pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 51
Sector RS: 36
Sector 3M: -9.3% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Consumer FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

PARIND candles · FIT view+6.1%
Latest close ₹696.35 on 2026-10-19
Bar
-4.2%
RSI
47
MACD hist
-0.95
52W pos
66%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-19O ₹727.00H ₹735.00L ₹680.20C ₹696.35Vol 7,356 sh
₹580.05₹634.77₹689.50₹744.23₹798.9552H₹696.352026-09VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-072026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

PARINNifty Consumer DurablesNifty 500
-12%-6%-1%+4%20 Jul2 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026PARIN -4.6%Nifty Consumer Durabl… -9.7%Nifty 500 -5.6%
PARIN
-4.6%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Consumer Durables
-9.7%
Vs Nifty 500
+1.0 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-11.7%
₹789
52W range position
68%
₹502 - ₹789
ATR (14)
4.4%
₹30.7
Volume vs 20D
0.30x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹1.8 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹658.2 - ₹789
21.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is consistent.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
25

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
40

Revenue -21.6% · PAT +174.3% YoY

Technical
Neutral
45

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-650.2%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
73

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Sept 2026

Average · 40/100

Rev -22% YoY · PAT +174% YoY · margin expansion · operating leverage

Filed 17 Oct 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹85.4 Cr-21.6%NDF
EBITDA₹12 Cr+32.9%-0.3%
Operating margin14.0%+600 bps+500 bps
PAT₹8.2 Cr+174.3%NDF
PAT margin9.6%+688 bps+675 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
122.00
P/B
9.97
EV/EBITDA
33.65
Market Cap
774.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
9.29%
ROCE
10.70%
ROA
3.45%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
24.00%
EPS 5Y
7.00%
Revenue 3Y
45.00%
EPS 3Y
31.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.31
Interest Coverage
3.00×
Altman Z
5.84
Book Value
69.80

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
—
FCF Positive Y
4/5
OCF
3.00 Cr
EPS TTM
5.66

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
11.00%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
66%

Financial History

Updated 19/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 85.4-38.5% vs prev
0139.0Mar 2021: 42.0Sep 2021: 23.0Mar 2022: 53.0Sep 2022: 22.0Mar 2023: 59.0Sep 2023: 48.0Mar 2024: 34.0Sep 2024: 37.0Mar 2025: 131Sep 2025: 109Mar 2026: 139Sep 2026: 85.4FY21Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26Q2 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 8.2+105.8% vs prev
08.2Mar 2021: 2.0Sep 2021: 0.0Mar 2022: 4.0Sep 2022: 0.0Mar 2023: 3.0Sep 2023: 1.0Mar 2024: 1.0Sep 2024: 1.0Mar 2025: 6.0Sep 2025: 3.0Mar 2026: 4.0Sep 2026: 8.2FY21Q2 21FY22Q2 22FY23Q2 23FY24Q2 24FY25Q2 25FY26Q2 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 47. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price above SMA200 (long-term uptrend) but mid-term MAs not aligned.
  • SMA20 falling (~1.1% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 47 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD below signal but histogram contracting — bearish momentum easing.
  • 12% off 52W high · 35% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

78
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-1.1%
3M return
-1.0%
6M return
+9.6%
1Y return
+29.2%
RS 1D
+1
RS 20D
+2
Sector rank
#9
Industry rank
-
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 1.7% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed -0.0% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price above
Sector
neutral
Industry
unranked
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
254 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 142.12+1.25%
98110123136149Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 26142
RS vs Nifty 500142

Valuation & peers

U-Score 25 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

25U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth10/25
Quality2/20
Balance Sheet4/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
0
Raw sum
25

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

25/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Growth contributes 10/25 to the score.
  • Cash flow contributes 4/10 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -650.2%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium

Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.

Consumer PE/PEG
Primary lens
PE and PEG relative to growth, ROE, margins, and brand strength.
Secondary checks
Volume growth, pricing power, distribution, same-store or category growth.
Main risk check
Premium valuation needs durable growth and margin resilience.
PE
122.0
PB
10.0
EV/EBITDA
33.6
ROE
9.3%
ROCE
10.7%
FCF Yield
—
Debt/Equity
1.3
MoS
-650.2%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
25
Previous: 25
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-650.2%
Previous: -650.2%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: -2 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
25

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹94.28
-638.6% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
16.4
Growth-justified Value
₹92.82
-650.2% MoS
PEG
10.89

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Consumer — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
METROGLOBL
Small
Metroglobal Limited
Trading
match 74
45
7.4
1.3%
-1%
WATCHLIST
ARENTERP
Small
Rajdarshan Industries Limited
Trading
match 74
19
—
-0.8%
—
OVERVALUED
ECOLINE
SME
Ecoline Exim Ltd.
Trading
match 68
67
20.2
32.0%
+66%
UNDERVALUED
PHOGLOBAL
SME
Phoenix Overseas Ltd.
Trading
match 66
27
9.5
4.2%
-14%
OVERVALUED
VISAMAN
SME
Visaman Global Sales Ltd.
Trading
match 65
47
8.6
11.0%
+81%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Parin Enterprises Ltd. operates in Trading, within the Consumer sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Sept 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
73Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 72nd percentile of the scored universe and 76th percentile within Consumer. No major sub-score weakness stands out.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
72nd percentile

overall median 67 · Consumer: 76th pctile, median 66 · SME: 90th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
67
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
61
acceptable · leverage and solvency
Discipline
68
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
88
strong · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 72.8%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸4 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.

Trust risks

  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.21.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

2 shown
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.