Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC)
Large CapEnergy stocks · Large cap · NSE
Oil & Natural Gas Corp Ltd (ONGC) is an Indian listed company. The provided document is a header for its earnings call transcript, but contains no specific business or operational details.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Strong fundamentals, management trust is supportive, but price trend argues for patience. Suitable for staggered entry or watchlist confirmation rather than aggressive buying.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Bad · 2/100PAT -43% YoY · margin compression · Rev +26% YoY · +18% QoQ
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹2,04,987 Cr | +25.7% | +17.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹15,485 Cr | -39.9% | -38.9% |
| Operating margin | 8.0% | -800 bps | -700 bps |
| PAT | ₹6,554 Cr | -43.3% | -52.1% |
| PAT margin | 3.2% | -388 bps | -467 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Where growth can come from, and what can break the case
No financial or operational results are available in the provided document, which is a transcript header.
The provided document is a transcript header and contains no financial or operational data to form or assess an investment thesis for ONGC. Without any disclosed information, monitoring is not possible.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
What management said, and what results must prove
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
No financial or operational data is available in the provided document to determine a relevant comparison basis.
Numbers and claims to verify in the next filings
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trend score and candlestick chart
37Bearishfull bear SMA stack · SMA20 -3.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low
Technical chart
ONGCdaily · 1Y · AUTO-15.1%Daily technical trend read
Mixed signalsSignals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 42. Wait for confirmation.
- Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
- SMA20 falling (~3.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
- RSI(14) at 42 — rising, no extreme reading.
- MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
- Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
- Price is 11.0% below the 30-week proxy.
- The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -0.8%.
- Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 75 · DEEP VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 75 · DEEP VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
DEEP VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 18.7%.
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 65.2%.
Main drags
- Quality is weaker at 2/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 10/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Growth is weaker at 17/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE
Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 86th percentile of the scored universe and 74th percentile within Energy. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
High Trust Lite: Promoter holding is 58.9%. Key concern: 1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.
overall median 67 · Energy: 74th pctile, median 74 · Large: 70th pctile, median 73
32 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Healthy Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter holding is 58.9%.
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is 18.7%.
- ▸11 years of positive FCF.
Trust risks
- ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 6.75
- P/B
- 0.79
- EV/EBITDA
- 3.61
- Market Cap
- 295196.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 11.60%
- ROCE
- 14.20%
- ROA
- 5.70%
- Dividend Y
- 5.65%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 15.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 21.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- -1.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 1.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.47
- Interest Coverage
- 7.39×
- Altman Z
- 2.54
- Book Value
- 296.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 18.73%
- FCF Positive Y
- 11/5
- OCF
- 112719.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 34.59
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 58.89%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 9%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in Energy, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in Energy, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Energy — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.