Skip to content

Navneet Education Limited (NAVNETEDUL)

Small Cap

Services stocks · Small cap · NSE

Navneet Education Limited operates in Publishing, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹124.79
-0.17 · -0.14%
Market cap ₹2,720 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result28 Jul, 07:59 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Services P/E 17.7 (n=143)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

40Neutral

SMA20 -5.9% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 40
Sector RS: —
Services FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

NAVNETEDULD candles · FIT view-14.1%
Latest close ₹124.79 on 2026-10-21
Bar
+0.6%
RSI
51
MACD hist
0.69
52W pos
15%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹124.01H ₹125.35L ₹123.05C ₹124.79Vol 89,276 sh
₹115.63₹126.20₹136.78₹147.35₹157.9252L₹124.792026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

NAVNETEDULNifty 500
-20%-12%-4%+4%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026NAVNETEDUL -14.6%Nifty 500 -6.5%
NAVNETEDUL
-14.6%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Vs Nifty 500
-8.1 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-24.8%
₹166
52W range position
15%
₹117.6 - ₹166
ATR (14)
2.5%
₹3.1
Volume vs 20D
0.88x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹1.2 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹117.6 - ₹127.1
18.2% annualized volatility

No exact NSE sector index is mapped for this company. Nifty 500 remains the broad-market comparison.

Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Investable fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is weak.

Good U-Score but weak results consistency: verify latest quarters.

Suggested next step
Add to watchlist
Fundamental setup is interesting, but technical confirmation is weak.
U-Score
Legacy · UNDERVALUED
74

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
0

Revenue -0.8% · PAT -10.2% YoY

Technical
Neutral
40

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+69.0%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
70

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Bad · 0/100

Rev -1% YoY · PAT -10% YoY · margin compression · +83% QoQ

Filed 28 Jul 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹788 Cr-0.8%+83.3%
EBITDA₹198 Cr-12.8%+273.6%
Operating margin25.0%-400 bps+1300 bps
PAT₹141 Cr-10.2%+261.5%
PAT margin17.9%-188 bps+882 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
21.70
P/B
1.33
EV/EBITDA
8.70
Market Cap
2720.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
8.03%
ROCE
10.20%
ROA
13.76%
Dividend Y
2.44%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
16.00%
EPS 5Y
40.00%
Revenue 3Y
1.00%
EPS 3Y
-1.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.06
Interest Coverage
15.25×
Altman Z
4.45
Book Value
92.30

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
7.76%
FCF Positive Y
9/5
OCF
307.00 Cr
EPS TTM
15.19

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
63.29%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
7%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 788+83.3% vs prev
0798.0Sep 2023: 266Dec 2023: 259Mar 2024: 435Jun 2024: 798Sep 2024: 272Dec 2024: 282Mar 2025: 434Jun 2025: 794Sep 2025: 247Dec 2025: 250Mar 2026: 430Jun 2026: 788Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 141+261.5% vs prev
-15.00747.0Sep 2023: 36.0Dec 2023: -13.0Mar 2024: 48.0Jun 2024: 747Sep 2024: -5.0Dec 2024: 15.0Mar 2025: 48.0Jun 2025: 157Sep 2025: -15.0Dec 2025: 188Mar 2026: 39.0Jun 2026: 141Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend down. RSI 51. Wait for confirmation.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~6.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 51 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 25% off 52W high · 6% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

36
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-1.6%
3M return
-14.6%
6M return
-13.6%
1Y return
-24.0%
RS 1D
+4
RS 20D
+1
Sector rank
#11
Industry rank
#65
Stage evidence
  • Price is 8.6% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -1.5%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
improving
Industry
improving
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 84.63+0.80%
78859299106Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2685
RS vs Nifty 50085

Valuation & peers

U-Score 74 · legacy U-Score band UNDERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

74U-SCORE
Top Setup

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · UNDERVALUED
Valuation26/30
Growth21/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet13/15
Cash Flow8/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
74

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

74/100 · legacy band UNDERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 7.8%.
  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 69.0%.

Main drags

  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Cash flow is weaker at 8/10; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 21/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Blended valuation: PE, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and balance-sheet checks

For this sector, IndiaPulse uses a blended lens rather than relying on a single valuation ratio.

Blended relative
Primary lens
PE, EV/EBITDA, margin of safety, and FCF yield together.
Secondary checks
ROE/ROCE, growth, cash conversion, leverage, promoter risk.
Main risk check
One cheap metric is not enough if quality or cash flow is weak.
PE
21.7
PB
1.3
EV/EBITDA
8.7
ROE
8.0%
ROCE
10.2%
FCF Yield
7.8%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
+69.0%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
74
Previous: 74
Legacy U-Score band
UNDERVALUED
Previous: UNDERVALUED
Margin of safety
+69.0%
Previous: +69.0%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹177.61
+29.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
26.6
Growth-justified Value
₹403.29
+69.0% MoS
PEG
0.54

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SCHAND
Small
S Chand And Company Limited
Education
match 85
70
6.6
7.2%
+75%
UNDERVALUED
SEIL
Small
Shanti Educational Initiatives Limited
Education
match 57
25
509.0
8.0%
-1768%
OVERVALUED
ZEELEARN
Small
Zee Learn Limited
Education
match 56
60
7.6
-0.4%
+84%
UNDERVALUED
GLOBAL
Small
Global Education Limited
Education
match 53
51
27.2
22.0%
-4%
FAIR VALUE
CLEDUCATE
Small
CL Educate Limited
Education
match 53
19
—
-9.1%
—
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Navneet Education Limited operates in Publishing, within the Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
70Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 63rd percentile of the scored universe and 73rd percentile within Services. Main check: results consistency is weak at 12/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
126 docs text-extracted · 41 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
63rd percentile

overall median 67 · Services: 73rd pctile, median 66 · Small: 65th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

126 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
89
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
50
watch · capital discipline
Results
12
weak · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 63.3%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 7.3%.
  • ▸9 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸ROCE trend is -3.5%.
  • ▸0/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
  • ▸1/4 latest quarters had positive YoY PAT growth.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

5 shown
Concall transcriptAug 2026

Aug 2026 · Transcript

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Investor presentationAug 2026

Aug 2026 · PPT

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 30 Jul - Dear Sir/Madam, Please find the attachment herewith News paper Publication

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 25 May - Dear Sir/Madam, Please find the attachment herewith News Paper Publication

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.