Skip to content

Nahar Capital and Financial Services Limited (NAHARCAP)

Small Cap

Financial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE

Nahar Capital and Financial Services Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹229.86
-9.09 · -3.80%
Market cap ₹392 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result05 Aug, 10:46 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags03 May 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Financial Services P/E 17.0 (n=243)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

39Bearish

SMA20 -6.8% / mo · MACD +

Stock trend: 35
Sector RS: 45
Sector 3M: -5.7% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

NAHARCAPD candles · FIT view-8.4%
Latest close ₹229.86 on 2026-10-21
Bar
-1.7%
RSI
39
MACD hist
0.30
52W pos
35%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹233.90H ₹235.06L ₹227.76C ₹229.86Vol 1,610 sh
₹201.86₹225.73₹249.60₹273.47₹297.34₹229.862026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

NAHARCAPNifty Financial ServicesNifty 500
-12%-4%+3%+10%21 Jul2 Sept21 Oct21 Oct 2026NAHARCAP -8.9%Nifty Financial Servi… -6.9%Nifty 500 -6.5%
NAHARCAP
-8.9%
Nifty 500
-6.5%
Nifty Financial Services
-6.9%
Vs Nifty 500
-2.4 pp
Chart stats
21 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-23.7%
₹301.2
52W range position
35%
₹191 - ₹301.2
ATR (14)
5.0%
₹11.5
Volume vs 20D
0.60x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.1 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹206.2 - ₹256.5
35.6% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Mixed fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · FAIR VALUE
53

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Excellent
100

Revenue +50.0% · PAT +509.1% YoY

Technical
Bearish
39

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
+59.9%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
72

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Excellent · 100/100

Rev +50% YoY · PAT +509% YoY · margin expansion · +13% QoQ · operating leverage

Filed 05 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹9 Cr+50.0%+12.5%
EBITDA₹6 Cr+100.0%+50.0%
Operating margin65.0%+1300 bps+2000 bps
PAT₹67 Cr+509.1%+272.2%
PAT margin744.4%+56111 bps+51944 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
3.29
P/B
0.24
EV/EBITDA
21.16
Market Cap
392.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
3.98%
ROCE
5.03%
ROA
6.68%
Dividend Y
0.64%

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
1.00%
EPS 5Y
1.00%
Revenue 3Y
13.00%
EPS 3Y
-16.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.01
Interest Coverage
18.00×
Altman Z
2.98
Book Value
960.00

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.77%
FCF Positive Y
11/5
OCF
11.00 Cr
EPS TTM
71.11

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
72.53%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
33%

Financial History

Updated 21/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 9.0+12.5% vs prev
012.0Sep 2023: 8.0Dec 2023: 4.0Mar 2024: 6.0Jun 2024: 7.0Sep 2024: 12.0Dec 2024: 5.0Mar 2025: 3.0Jun 2025: 6.0Sep 2025: 10.0Dec 2025: 5.0Mar 2026: 8.0Jun 2026: 9.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 67.0+272.2% vs prev
067.0Sep 2023: 5.0Dec 2023: 0.0Mar 2024: 9.0Jun 2024: 12.0Sep 2024: 10.0Dec 2024: 6.0Mar 2025: 21.0Jun 2025: 11.0Sep 2025: 20.0Dec 2025: 13.0Mar 2026: 18.0Jun 2026: 67.0Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 39.

  • Price below SMA200 (long-term downtrend) — short-term bounces likely countertrend.
  • SMA20 falling (~7.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 39 — falling, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 24% off 52W high · 20% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

43
RS percentile
Stage 1 Base / Transition
1M return
-10.1%
3M return
-8.9%
6M return
-8.3%
1Y return
-20.9%
RS 1D
-3
RS 20D
-9
Sector rank
#10
Industry rank
#42
Stage evidence
  • Price is within 7.4% of the 30-week proxy.
  • The 30-week proxy changed +0.7% over 20 sessions.
  • The moving-average structure does not confirm Stage 2 or Stage 4.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
weakening
Industry
weakening
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
262 observations
21 Oct 2026Value 85.33-2.90%
76839097104Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2685
RS vs Nifty 50085

Valuation & peers

U-Score 53 · legacy U-Score band FAIR VALUE · valuation evidence and comparable companies

53U-SCORE
Deep Value

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · FAIR VALUE
Valuation30/30
Growth5/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet12/15
Cash Flow4/10
Piotroski
8/9 (+5)
Penalties
-3
Raw sum
53

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

53/100 · legacy band FAIR VALUE

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 59.9%.
  • Valuation contributes 30/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 3 points.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Growth is weaker at 5/25; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

NBFC valuation: P/B, ROA, borrowing cost, and asset quality

Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.

NBFC P/B
Primary lens
P/B adjusted for ROA/ROE and leverage quality.
Secondary checks
AUM growth, spreads, credit cost, liquidity and ALM risk.
Main risk check
Fast growth with weak asset quality deserves a discount.
PE
3.3
PB
0.2
EV/EBITDA
21.2
ROE
4.0%
ROCE
5.0%
FCF Yield
0.8%
Debt/Equity
0.0
MoS
+59.9%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
53
Previous: 53
Legacy U-Score band
FAIR VALUE
Previous: FAIR VALUE
Margin of safety
+59.9%
Previous: +58.3%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53
53

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹1,239.34
+81.5% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
8.1
Growth-justified Value
₹573.15
+59.9% MoS
PEG
3.29

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SAHLIBHFI
Small
Shalibhadra Finance Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 156
51
12.0
11.9%
+54%
FAIR VALUE
VIJIFIN
Small
Viji Finance Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 156
5
67.0
1.2%
-2285%
OVERVALUED
MONEYBOXX
Small
Moneyboxx Finance Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 156
13
272.0
0.5%
-903%
OVERVALUED
MANCREDIT
Small
Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 155
19
66.8
7.7%
-134%
OVERVALUED
UYFINCORP
Small
U. Y. Fincorp Limited
NBFC / Capital Markets / Insurance
match 155
15
—
2.4%
—
OVERVALUED

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Nahar Capital and Financial Services Limited operates in Finance, within the Financial Services sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
72Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 69th percentile of the scored universe and 81st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 40/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
8 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
69th percentile

overall median 67 · Financial Services: 81st pctile, median 62 · Small: 71st pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

8 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
77
strong · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
40
weak · capital discipline
Results
57
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 72.5%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 0.7%.
  • ▸11 years of positive FCF.

Trust risks

  • ▸ROCE is low at 5%.
  • ▸ROE is low at 4%.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 30%.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 10 Aug - Copy of Newspaper Publication dated 10.08.2026 is enclosed

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Directorate 5 Aug - Board approves reappointment of MD Dinesh Oswal and two independent directors from 2027, pending AGM approval.

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 2 Jul - Copy of Newspaper publication dated 02.07.2026 is enclosed

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.