MRF Limited (MRF)
Mid CapAuto stocks · Mid cap · NSE
MRF Limited operates in Tyres, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.
One read, four checks
75+ is strong, 60-74 is usable, 45-59 is mixed, and below 45 needs caution. These are research lenses, not buy/sell instructions.
Mixed fundamentals, management trust is supportive, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is consistent.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
low confidence · 0/0 claims checked
Timing lens: price trend and sector relative strength.
Rolling lens: recent quarterly delivery, not the latest single-result score.
Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026
Bad · 0/100PAT -1% YoY · margin compression · Rev +10% YoY
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹8,416 Cr | +9.6% | +4.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹991 Cr | -7.4% | -24.1% |
| Operating margin | 12.0% | -200 bps | -400 bps |
| PAT | ₹495 Cr | -1.4% | -29.5% |
| PAT margin | 5.9% | -66 bps | -285 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Business & thesis
Growth engines, tailwinds/headwinds, and risk radar from management commentary
Issuer presentation review pending
MRF Limited operates in Tyres, within the Auto sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Management accountability
What management said, and what results must prove
Trend score and candlestick chart
28Bearishfull bear SMA stack · MACD − · sector -3.3pp vs Nifty (3M)
Technical chart
MRFdaily · 1Y · AUTO-7.3%Daily technical trend read
Bearish setupTrend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 41.
- Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
- SMA20 roughly flat — short-term momentum stalled.
- RSI(14) at 41 — falling, no extreme reading.
- MACD below signal, histogram expanding negatively — bearish momentum building.
- 21% off 52W high · 7% above 52W low.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
Relative Strength & Trend Stage
- Price is 2.1% below the 30-week proxy.
- The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -0.7%.
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 53 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Valuation & score drivers
U-Score 53 · FAIR VALUE · pillar breakdown, sector model, fair-value anchor
Fundamental score breakdown
FAIR VALUEWhy this score?
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Positive drivers
- FCF yield is supportive at 4.6%.
- Piotroski is strong at 8/9.
- Fair-value margin of safety is positive at 42.7%.
Main drags
- Quality is weaker at 5/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Valuation is weaker at 12/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
- Balance sheet is weaker at 8/15; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Consumer valuation: PE/PEG and brand-quality premium
Consumer franchises can deserve higher multiples, but only when growth quality supports them.
Stored run vs live recompute
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
Score history
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +4 points.
Factor attribution
Modelled fair value
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust score
Does management behaviour match later outcomes? Claim delivery, forensic breakdown, evidence depth
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Healthy Trust: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 88th percentile of the scored universe and 75th percentile within Auto. No major sub-score weakness stands out.
High Trust Lite: Promoter pledge is zero.
Generally investable credibility. Look for weak sub-scores before increasing position size.
overall median 67 · Auto: 75th pctile, median 74 · Mid: 68th pctile, median 76
5 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
How to read this Trust Score
Healthy Trust · low confidenceRead Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Forensic breakdown
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust positives
- ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
- ▸FCF yield is positive at 4.6%.
- ▸6 years of positive FCF.
- ▸4/4 latest quarters had positive YoY revenue growth.
Trust risks
- ▸No major Trust Lite risk flags.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Financials
Full fundamentals table and 10-year revenue / profit / ROE history
Fundamentals
Valuation
- P/E
- 22.40
- P/B
- 2.63
- EV/EBITDA
- 8.84
- Market Cap
- 55112.00Cr
Profitability
- ROE
- 12.50%
- ROCE
- 15.70%
- ROA
- 7.57%
- Dividend Y
- 0.18%
Growth (CAGR)
- Revenue 5Y
- 14.00%
- EPS 5Y
- 14.00%
- Revenue 3Y
- 11.00%
- EPS 3Y
- 52.00%
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity
- 0.15
- Interest Coverage
- 13.54×
- Altman Z
- 5.66
- Book Value
- 49455.00
Cash Flow
- FCF Yield
- 4.56%
- FCF Positive Y
- 6/5
- OCF
- 4590.00 Cr
- EPS TTM
- 5700.98
Shareholding
- Promoter Hold
- 27.76%
- Promoter Pledge
- 0.00%
- Momentum 52W
- 19%
Financial History
Updated 5/9/2026
Revenue
₹ CrNet Profit
₹ CrReturn on Equity
%Peers
Business-comparable names in Auto, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable names in Auto, ranked by similarity
Peers
Business-comparable peers in Auto — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.