Skip to content

Mono Pharmacare Ltd. (MONOPHARMA)

SME Cap

Pharma stocks · SME cap · NSE

Mono Pharmacare Ltd. operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹8.9
+0.00 · +0.00%
Market cap ₹15.7 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote19 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals20 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result16 Jul, 06:45 pm IST
Score20 Oct, 04:19 pm IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags24 Apr 2026
Coverage14/14 · 100%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Pharma P/E 33.5 (n=187)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

63Bullish

SMA20 -3.3% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low · sector +3.8pp vs Nifty 500 (3M)

Stock trend: 40
Sector RS: 98
Sector 3M: -1.8% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%

FPI equity flow was positive in both fortnights, but the sector index is below its 100-session average. View sector evidence

Technical chart

MONOPHARMAD candles · FIT view-28.8%
Latest close ₹8.90 on 2026-10-09
Bar
+5.3%
RSI
52
MACD hist
0.06
52W pos
10%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-09O ₹8.45H ₹8.90L ₹8.45C ₹8.90Vol 14,000 sh
₹7.21₹8.80₹10.38₹11.97₹13.5552L₹8.90VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-10
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

MONOPHARMANifty PharmaNifty 500
-32%-18%-4%+9%13 Jul25 Aug9 Oct9 Oct 2026MONOPHARMA -16.0%Nifty Pharma +1.3%Nifty 500 -6.3%
MONOPHARMA
-16.0%
Nifty 500
-6.3%
Nifty Pharma
+1.3%
Vs Nifty 500
-9.7 pp
Chart stats
9 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-68.1%
₹27.9
52W range position
7%
₹7.5 - ₹27.9
ATR (14)
4.1%
₹0.4
Volume vs 20D
1.82x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹8 - ₹9
55.5% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.

Suggested next step
Check latest quarters
Result consistency is weak; verify whether the thesis is improving or deteriorating.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
18

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Bad
2

Revenue +76.8% · PAT -100.0% YoY

Technical
Bullish
63

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-408.4%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
51

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 31 Mar 2026

Bad · 2/100

PAT -100% YoY · margin compression · Rev +77% YoY · +50% QoQ

Filed 31 Mar 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹99 Cr+76.8%+50.0%
EBITDA₹2 CrNDF+0.0%
Operating margin2.2%NDF-50 bps
PAT₹0 Cr-100.0%NDF
PAT margin0.0%NDF+0 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
21.60
P/B
0.50
EV/EBITDA
14.34
Market Cap
15.70Cr

Profitability

ROE
2.33%
ROCE
5.10%
ROA
0.82%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
71.34%
EPS 5Y
—
Revenue 3Y
71.00%
EPS 3Y
-8.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
1.75
Interest Coverage
1.67×
Altman Z
1.86
Book Value
17.90

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
19.11%
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
3.00 Cr
EPS TTM
0.41

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
56.72%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 20/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 166-1.2% vs prev
0168.0Mar 2023: 33.0Mar 2024: 122Mar 2025: 168Mar 2026: 166FY23FY24FY25FY26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 1.0-66.7% vs prev
03.0Mar 2023: 1.0Mar 2024: 2.0Mar 2025: 3.0Mar 2026: 1.0FY23FY24FY25FY26

Return on Equity

%
Latest: 3.1-66.6% vs prev
09.4Mar 2023: 7.7%Mar 2024: 7.1%Mar 2025: 9.4%Mar 2026: 3.1%FY23FY24FY25FY26

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Mixed signals

Signals are conflicting — long-term trend unclear. RSI 52. Wait for confirmation.

  • SMA20 falling (~3.4% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 52 — rising, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal, histogram expanding — bullish momentum building.
  • 60% off 52W high · 19% above 52W low.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

34
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
+2.9%
3M return
-18.7%
6M return
-18.0%
1Y return
-
RS 1D
+14
RS 20D
+31
Sector rank
#1
Industry rank
#11
Stage evidence
  • Price is 22.1% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -12.1%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Partial-history RS: the 3M and 6M weights are re-normalised because 12M history is unavailable.
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
172 observations
09 Oct 2026Value 42.02+3.50%
29507090110Sept 25Jan 26Jun 26Oct 2642
RS vs Nifty 50042

Valuation & peers

U-Score 18 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

18U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation11/30
Growth6/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet2/15
Cash Flow5/10
Piotroski
4/9 (+1)
Penalties
-7
Raw sum
18

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

18/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • FCF yield is supportive at 19.1%.
  • Cash flow contributes 5/10 to the score.
  • Valuation contributes 11/30 to the score.

Main drags

  • Penalty bucket subtracts 7 points.
  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -408.4%.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Healthcare valuation: PE/EVEBITDA with regulatory and pipeline checks

Healthcare valuation needs both earnings quality and regulatory/pipeline context.

Pharma PE/EVEBITDA
Primary lens
PE and EV/EBITDA adjusted for product mix and R&D/pipeline quality.
Secondary checks
USFDA risk, launch pipeline, margin trend, domestic vs export mix.
Main risk check
Regulatory setbacks or one-off product cycles can distort valuation.
PE
21.6
PB
0.5
EV/EBITDA
14.3
ROE
2.3%
ROCE
5.1%
FCF Yield
19.1%
Debt/Equity
1.8
MoS
-408.4%
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
18
Previous: 18
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-408.4%
Previous: -408.4%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

20 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹12.85
+30.7% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
4.3
Growth-justified Value
₹1.75
-408.4% MoS
PEG
—

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Pharma — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
SUNREST
SME
Sunrest Lifescience Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 164
68
5.5
15.2%
+91%
UNDERVALUED
JFLLIFE
SME
JFL Life Sciences Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 152
69
5.0
15.0%
+89%
UNDERVALUED
ONYX
SME
Onyx Biotec Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 150
15
—
-0.4%
—
OVERVALUED
CURIS
SME
Curis Lifesciences Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 149
33
30.0
—
+57%
WATCHLIST
REMUS
SME
Remus Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
match 148
44
27.6
12.2%
+30%
WATCHLIST

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Mono Pharmacare Ltd. operates in Formulations, within the Pharma sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 31 Mar 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
51Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 9th percentile of the scored universe and 6th percentile within Pharma. Main check: financial discipline is weak at 10/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
0 docs text-extracted · 0 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
9th percentile

overall median 67 · Pharma: 6th pctile, median 70 · SME: 9th pctile, median 64

Evidence depth
Financial-only

0 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Needs extra due diligence; demand valuation comfort and recent improvement.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
86
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
65
acceptable · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
39
weak · leverage and solvency
Discipline
10
weak · capital discipline
Results
49
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 56.7%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is 12.7%.
  • ▸OPM spread across recent quarters is 3.8%.

Trust risks

  • ▸2 latest quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.
  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 1.75.
  • ▸Interest coverage is 1.3x.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

2 shown
Annual reportMar 2026

Mar 2026 · Annual Report 2026

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Annual reportMar 2025

Mar 2025 · Annual Report 2025

Source: Nse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.