Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Change in Management 15 Sep - Manappuram Finance reports resignations of two business heads, effective September 15 and 16, 2026.
Source: Bse
Financial Services stocks · Small cap · NSE
Manappuram Finance is a leading listed gold lender in India, operating 5,000+ branches. It pioneered online gold loans and cellular vaulting. The company has scaled Asirvad Microfinance and offers small ticket home loans, used vehicle loans, and MSME financing, aiming to be a financial partner for under-banked customers.
SMA20 -5.9% / mo · MACD +
Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence
Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100
Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend is neutral, and recent execution is weak.
Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.
Revenue +34.1% · PAT +343.2% YoY
Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.
Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.
Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.
Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence
Rev +34% YoY · PAT +343% YoY · +16% QoQ · operating leverage
| Metric | This quarter | YoY | QoQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹3,034 Cr | +34.1% | +16.1% |
| EBITDA | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| Operating margin | NDF | NDF | NDF |
| PAT | ₹585 Cr | +343.2% | +44.4% |
| PAT margin | 19.3% | +1344 bps | +379 bps |
NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.
Updated 20/10/2026
Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence
Trend is undirectional — long-term uptrend intact. RSI 48.
Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.
U-Score 21 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies
Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.
Lenders can look optically cheap before credit losses emerge, so valuation is tied to book quality.
This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.
12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.
Business-comparable peers in Financial Services — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.
Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery
Consolidated AUM grew 22.4% QoQ and 48.3% YoY to INR 63,798 Cr, driven by strong gold loan growth. However, consolidated PAT declined 17.5% YoY to INR 405 Cr, despite a 69.7% QoQ increase, impacted by MFI segment losses.
While core gold loan AUM growth is robust, the consolidated PAT decline YoY and significant losses in the Asirvad Microfinance segment raise concerns. The MFI segment's asset quality and profitability remain a drag, offsetting strong performance in the primary business. Diversification benefits are not yet evident.
Latest issuer-disclosed distribution across 5 reported categories.
Pioneered OGL in 2015, enabling 24x7 access and instant fund transfers up to pre-approved limits.
Leveraging these channels for gold loan growth.
Utilizing digital marketing activities to expand reach.
Cross-selling non-gold loan products to existing gold loan customers.
Gold loans have limited sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations due to small ticket size, short tenor, and inherent convenience.
Significant operating expense leverage expected as new branches mature.
Received rating upgrade from S&P to BB- (Oct 2021) and CRISIL to AA (Sep 2019).
Raised $300 mn Debt under Reg S in May 2024, indicating access to diversified funding sources.
Asirvad Microfinance AUM declined 35.7% YoY, and the segment reported a full-year loss of INR 579 Cr in FY26.
Consolidated PAT decreased 17.5% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 17.5% for FY26, despite strong AUM growth.
Standalone PAT decreased 9.4% YoY in Q4 FY26 and 14.5% for FY26.
Standalone provisions/bad debts increased 171.9% YoY in Q4 FY26, impacting profitability.
Asirvad Microfinance reported GNPA of 4.8% and NNPA of 1.6% in Q4 FY26, indicating elevated credit risk in this segment.
Standalone provisions for bad debts surged 171.9% YoY in Q4 FY26, suggesting potential asset quality stress beyond MFI.
Issuer guidance and extracted claims are tracked against later reported outcomes. Treat these as management statements, not IndiaPulse forecasts.
NBFC performance is best assessed by both sequential (QoQ) momentum in AUM and disbursements, and annual (YoY) trends for sustained growth, seasonal effects, and asset quality evolution.
INR 63,798 Cr, up 22.4% QoQ and 48.3% YoY.
INR 48,814 Cr, up 31.4% QoQ and 98% YoY.
INR 405 Cr, up 69.7% QoQ, down 17.5% YoY.
INR 376 Cr, down 1.5% QoQ, down 9.4% YoY.
To become the financial partner of choice for under-banked customers across their lifecycle.
Create a market for gold loans as a mainstream, convenient, and affordable product.
Aim to be a one-stop shop for meeting under-banked customers' borrowing and protection needs.
Increasing focus on technology for sourcing, underwriting credit, and managing risk.
| Checkpoint | Current evidence | What to verify next |
|---|---|---|
| Consolidated PAT | INR 405 Cr (Q4 FY26) | Sustained YoY growth and recovery from full-year decline. |
| Asirvad Microfinance Profitability | INR 13 Cr (Q4 FY26) | Consistent quarterly profitability and a return to full-year profit. |
| Standalone Gold Loan AUM Growth | INR 48,814 Cr (Q4 FY26), up 98% YoY | Track if high growth rates are sustainable without compromising asset quality. |
| Consolidated Cost of Borrowing | 8.80% (Q4 FY26) | Observe if the cost of funds continues to decline amidst rising interest rates. |
Verification checkpoints are IndiaPulse research interpretation, not investment advice.
Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.
Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 1st percentile of the scored universe and 1st percentile within Financial Services. Main check: balance sheet trust is weak at 22/100.
This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.
Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.
overall median 67 · Financial Services: 1st pctile, median 62 · Small: 1st pctile, median 66
58 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.
0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet
Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.
Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.
Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.
Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse
Source: Bse