Skip to content

Maan Aluminium Limited (MAANALU)

Small Cap

Metals stocks · Small cap · NSE

Maan Aluminium Limited operates in Minerals, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers.

₹95.84
-2.92 · -2.96%
Market cap ₹630 Cr
Data qualityFresh enough for analysisQuote updated 21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Details
Quote21 Oct, 03:31 pm IST
Base fundamentals06 Oct 2026 · screener
Latest result13 Aug, 07:55 pm IST
Score21 Oct, 04:30 am IST · v4.3-runtime-valuation
Tags02 May 2026
Coverage13/14 · 93%
Valuation2026-07-20 · Rf 6.8% · Metals P/E 23.2 (n=92)
Technical timing lens

Trend score and candlestick chart

32Bearish

full bear SMA stack · SMA20 -11.1% / mo · MACD + · near 52W low

Stock trend: 24
Sector RS: 44
Sector 3M: -5.5% vs Nifty 500 -5.6%
Metals FPI tailwindNot confirmed

Latest mapped FPI equity flow was not positive. View sector evidence

Technical chart

MAANALUD candles · FIT view-36.7%TODAY · PROVISIONAL
Latest price ₹95.84 on 2026-10-21

Today's candle is provisional from the latest intraday quote; completed-candle scans remain unchanged.

Bar
-6.0%
RSI
35
MACD hist
0.11
52W pos
2%
Visible chart range
Candle interval
2026-10-21O ₹102.00H ₹102.00L ₹94.00C ₹95.84Vol 50,803 shIntraday candle
₹90.51₹109.72₹128.93₹148.13₹167.3452L₹95.842026-032026-06VolRSIMACD2026-042026-062026-082026-092026-11
Up bar
Down bar
EMA 20
EMA 50
Volume + 20D avg
Result date
RSI(14)
MACD / signal
Market context

Relative performance and chart statistics

Adjusted completed-session prices, rebased to 100

MAANALUNifty MetalNifty 500
-15%-5%+6%+16%20 Jul1 Sept19 Oct19 Oct 2026MAANALU -12.8%Nifty Metal -3.8%Nifty 500 -5.6%
MAANALU
-12.8%
Nifty 500
-5.6%
Nifty Metal
-3.8%
Vs Nifty 500
-7.3 pp
Chart stats
19 Oct 2026
From 52W high
-46.5%
₹184.7
52W range position
3%
₹96 - ₹184.7
ATR (14)
4.7%
₹4.6
Volume vs 20D
0.52x
Latest completed session
Avg traded value
₹0.6 Cr
20-session average
20D price channel
₹96 - ₹108.5
39.0% annualized volatility
Research snapshot

What the evidence says now

Weak fundamentals, management evidence is still limited to a financial-only Trust Lite signal, price trend argues for patience, and recent execution is mixed.

Suggested next step
Research, do not rush
The evidence is not strongly aligned. Compare peers and wait for a cleaner setup.
U-Score
Legacy · OVERVALUED
25

Fundamental lens: valuation, quality, growth, balance sheet, and cash flow.

Latest result
Average
32

Revenue +9.8% · PAT +13.6% YoY

Technical
Bearish
32

Price trend and sector-relative-strength timing.

Valuation
Legacy model
-1867.2%

Legacy margin-of-safety estimate; the revised evidence label remains in shadow validation.

Trust
Limited evidence
68

Financial-only signal; management claim evidence is not sufficient yet.

Financials

Fundamentals, quarterly history, margins, returns and balance-sheet evidence

Latest result

Quarter ended 30 Jun 2026

Average · 32/100

margin compression · Rev +10% YoY · PAT +14% YoY

Filed 13 Aug 2026
Open results browser →
MetricThis quarterYoYQoQ
Revenue₹231.9 Cr+9.8%-8.9%
EBITDA₹5.4 Cr+8.7%+227.4%
Operating margin2.3%-2 bps+168 bps
PAT₹3.1 Cr+13.6%+82.3%
PAT margin1.3%+5 bps+67 bps

NDF means not disclosed in the current structured filing feed. It is intentionally not treated as zero.

Fundamentals

Valuation

P/E
829.00
P/B
21.83
EV/EBITDA
168.43
Market Cap
630.00Cr

Profitability

ROE
2.90%
ROCE
—
ROA
2.57%
Dividend Y
—

Growth (CAGR)

Revenue 5Y
23.00%
EPS 5Y
23.00%
Revenue 3Y
6.00%
EPS 3Y
6.00%

Balance Sheet

Debt/Equity
0.06
Interest Coverage
5.76×
Altman Z
9.12
Book Value
4.81

Cash Flow

FCF Yield
0.26%
FCF Positive Y
1/5
OCF
5.21 Cr
EPS TTM
0.14

Shareholding

Promoter Hold
55.82%
Promoter Pledge
0.00%
Momentum 52W
10%

Financial History

Updated 18/10/2026

Revenue

₹ Cr
Latest: 232-8.9% vs prev
0295.3Sep 2023: 295Dec 2023: 213Mar 2024: 237Jun 2024: 177Sep 2024: 205Dec 2024: 182Mar 2025: 246Jun 2025: 211Sep 2025: 191Dec 2025: 152Mar 2026: 255Jun 2026: 232Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26

Net Profit

₹ Cr
Latest: 3.1+82.4% vs prev
07.9Sep 2023: 7.9Dec 2023: 7.4Mar 2024: 7.3Jun 2024: 3.4Sep 2024: 5.1Dec 2024: 3.0Mar 2025: 3.9Jun 2025: 2.7Sep 2025: 5.8Dec 2025: 2.8Mar 2026: 1.7Jun 2026: 3.1Q2 23Q3 23FY24Q1 24Q2 24Q3 24FY25Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25FY26Q1 26
ROE is shown only in the Annual view — quarterly equity data isn't published.

Technicals

Trend interpretation, Stage 2, relative strength, volume and indicator evidence

Daily technical trend read

Bearish setup

Trend is weak — long-term trend down. RSI 35.

  • Price < SMA20 < SMA50 < SMA200 — full bearish stack.
  • SMA20 falling (~12.3% over last month) — short-term momentum negative.
  • RSI(14) at 35 — sideways, no extreme reading.
  • MACD above signal but histogram contracting — bullish momentum cooling.
  • Within 5% of 52-week low — testing support.

Mechanical read from the price + indicator series above. Not a recommendation — technical setups can reverse without warning, especially around earnings and macro events.

Nifty 500 leadership

Relative Strength & Trend Stage

16
RS percentile
Stage 4 Downtrend
1M return
-5.7%
3M return
-12.8%
6M return
-31.5%
1Y return
-33.3%
RS 1D
-2
RS 20D
-18
Sector rank
#4
Industry rank
#14
Stage evidence
  • Price is 20.7% below the 30-week proxy.
  • The 50-DMA is below the 30-week proxy and its slope is falling -3.4%.
  • Both 3-month and 6-month returns are negative.
50-DMA
price below
200-DMA
price below
Sector
leading
Industry
leading
Relative-strength line vs Nifty 500 (base 100)
261 observations
19 Oct 2026Value 94.53-0.56%
91107123139155Sept 25Feb 26Jun 26Oct 2695
RS vs Nifty 50095

Valuation & peers

U-Score 25 · legacy U-Score band OVERVALUED · valuation evidence and comparable companies

25U-SCORE
OVERVALUED

Fundamental score breakdown

U band · OVERVALUED
Valuation0/30
Growth10/25
Quality0/20
Balance Sheet8/15
Cash Flow1/10
Piotroski
7/9 (+5)
Penalties
1
Raw sum
25

Why this score?

Top U-Score contributors and drags from the latest stored fundamentals.

25/100 · legacy band OVERVALUED

Positive drivers

  • Piotroski is strong at 7/9.
  • Balance sheet contributes 8/15 to the score.
  • Growth contributes 10/25 to the score.

Main drags

  • Fair-value margin of safety is negative at -1867.2%.
  • Valuation is weaker at 0/30; verify the latest quarterly trend.
  • Quality is weaker at 0/20; verify the latest quarterly trend.
Sector valuation model

Cyclical valuation: normalized earnings, not just trailing PE

Cyclical companies can look cheapest near peak profits, so IndiaPulse flags value-trap risk separately.

Cyclical normalized
Primary lens
Mid-cycle PE/EV/EBITDA using multi-year average margins or earnings.
Secondary checks
Current margin versus 5-year average, balance sheet strength, commodity cycle.
Main risk check
A low trailing PE may mean peak-cycle earnings, not true cheapness.
PE
829.0
PB
21.8
EV/EBITDA
168.4
ROE
2.9%
ROCE
—
FCF Yield
0.3%
Debt/Equity
0.1
MoS
-1867.2%
Cyclical/value-trap warning
This sector can look cheap when profits are temporarily high. Check mid-cycle margins/earnings before relying on trailing PE.
Score movement

Stored run vs live recompute

This shows the stored score trend when snapshots exist, and also compares the latest stored nightly score with a live recompute from current fundamentals and price.

Stored run: 21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
Final score
25
Previous: 25
Legacy U-Score band
OVERVALUED
Previous: OVERVALUED
Margin of safety
-1867.2%
Previous: -1927.1%

Score history

12 stored score snapshots. Latest stored move: +0 points.

21 Oct 2026
v4.3-runtime-valuation
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25

Factor attribution

No pillar movement versus the latest stored run. Historical score trend will appear after snapshot storage is enabled.

Modelled fair value

Graham Number
₹3.89
-2362.2% MoS
Growth-justified P/E
34.8
Growth-justified Value
₹4.87
-1867.2% MoS
PEG
51.17

Comparable companies

Peers

Business-comparable peers in Metals — ranked by industry, sub-sector, theme-tag overlap, market cap, and U-Score similarity. Green cells mark the best available peer metric in this table.

Compare all ↗
Ticker
Name
Why peer
Score
PE
ROE
MoS
Verdict
RAMASTEEL
Small
Rama Steel Tubes Limited
Mining
match 96
18
55.3
2.8%
-609%
OVERVALUED
SHIVAUM
Small
Shiv Aum Steels Limited
Mining
match 96
27
80.2
6.1%
-129%
OVERVALUED
VISACHROME
Small
VISA Chrome Limited
Mining
match 95
39
—
—
+99%
WATCHLIST
MANAKSTEEL
Small
Manaksia Steels Limited
Mining
match 94
62
12.4
13.0%
+57%
UNDERVALUED
PRADPME
Small
Pradeep Metals Limited
Mining
match 93
47
24.5
20.3%
+5%
FAIR VALUE

Business, management & trust

Growth engines, risks, management commitments and evidence-backed delivery

Business and thesis

Issuer presentation review pending

Maan Aluminium Limited operates in Minerals, within the Metals sector. Use the latest filing and company disclosures below to verify its revenue mix and current business drivers. The structured result feed currently covers the quarter ended 30 Jun 2026. Investor presentations and earnings-call PDFs will be added as issuer-backed evidence before management claims appear here.

Trust Score
68Limited evidence · low confidenceTrust Lite

Trust asks: does management behaviour match later outcomes? Higher is better, but confidence and evidence depth matter as much as the number.

Limited evidence: Claim history is still being built. It ranks around the 56th percentile of the scored universe and 46th percentile within Metals. Main check: cash conversion is weak at 53/100.

This is a financial-behaviour screen, not a claim-tested management reliability verdict.

Computed 05 Sept 2026
management-trust-v1
25 docs text-extracted · 5 concalls text-extracted
Score band
Limited evidence

Financial behaviour is scored, but management claims do not yet have enough outcome checks.

Relative rank
56th percentile

overall median 67 · Metals: 46th pctile, median 70 · Small: 60th pctile, median 66

Evidence depth
Financial-only

25 documents have extracted text, but claim history is not strong enough yet.

Claim delivery
Outcome history still building

0 claims extracted · No contradicted claim yet

How to read this Trust Score

Limited evidence · low confidence
What it measures
Reliability of management and financial delivery, using financial behaviour only.
Confidence
Treat this as an early read until more concalls and outcomes are matched.
Investor use
Acceptable, but check the weakest sub-score before increasing exposure.

Read Trust alongside U-Score, result consistency, and technical trend. A cheap stock with weak Trust needs a larger margin of safety; a high Trust score does not make an expensive stock attractive by itself.

Forensic breakdown

Read low sub-scores as due-diligence warnings, not automatic sell signals.

Promoter
78
strong · holding, pledge, alignment
Cash flow
53
watch · profit to cash conversion
Balance sheet
96
strong · leverage and solvency
Discipline
60
acceptable · capital discipline
Results
56
watch · quarterly consistency

Trust positives

  • ▸Promoter holding is 55.8%.
  • ▸Promoter pledge is zero.
  • ▸FCF yield is positive at 0.2%.
  • ▸Debt/equity is 0.06.

Trust risks

  • ▸Promoter holding fell 3.1%.
  • ▸Only 1 years of positive FCF.
  • ▸ROE is low at 2.9%.
  • ▸1 of the latest 4 quarters had PAT decline worse than 25% YoY.

Trust Lite uses financial behaviour only. Prefer claim-tested Trust when enough concall claims have later outcomes.

Important announcements & filings

Latest exchange and company disclosures found within the past two years.

6 shown
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 7 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 3 Sep

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Newspaper Publication 15 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Announcement

Announcement under Regulation 30 (LODR)-Analyst / Investor Meet - Intimation 10 Aug

Source: Bse

Open source ↗
Verify on:NSE India ↗
All information is for study purposes only. For investment decisions, consult your financial advisor. See Playbook for methodology.